Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A month ago I was hit by a car on my bike at the junction of Nunhead lane and Peckham rye (Nunhead side). I was waiting at the red light leaving Peckham and heading straight up the rye, there were cars coming in the opposite direction towards Peckham and some waiting to turn right across my path towards Nunhead. As the lights turned green I moved off forward ahead of the traffic behind me, one of the cars opposite waiting to turn right decided to get in ahead of my traffic and accelerated fast hitting me straight on. My bike was destroyed luckily I was fine. The driver said he couldn't see me.


The thing that made me write today is the exact same thing just happened to me going in the opposite direction luckily I was just missed clearly the driver didn't see me. At the moment it seems like there is nothing I can do to cross this junction safely on a bike (except walking through on the green man) without putting myself at risk.


I'm not sure how this junction could be improved maybe by having a right turn light (though the road doesn't seem wide enough heading towards Peckham).


If anyone has any advice about who I could speak to or write to I would be grateful. I have a crime reference no. for the first incident as the police turned up promptly and it was obvious what had happened.


Thanks for taking the time to read.


Lilaclou

The Southwark branch of the LCC has been campaigning for segregated tracks down that side of the Rye and on into Rye Lane to hook with Burgess Park and the various quiet routes down there. That would solve your problem but it has met predictably stiff opposition.


I'm sure your support would be appreciated: http://southwarkcyclists.org.uk/

Just writing to second David's suggestion about getting in touch with Southwark Cyclists.

In fact the AGM is tonight and Cllr Darren Merrill will be there (Chair of the council's Joint Cycle Steering Group)so it would be a good chance to discuss the junction with other local people who cycle through it and think about how to make improvements http://southwarkcyclists.org.uk/events/southwark-cyclists-monthly-meeting-and-agm/

Yes JohnL I'd like to think I could see a cyclist when turning right too. The reality seems to be that some people just don't seem to be able to and it is terribly frightening or worse when this happens. To me it seems like it might cause more traffic having some sort of extra lighting system but I can't think of any other way. Just telling people that bikes exist doesn't seem to work.


Davidk thank you for this info it looks really interesting I will get in touch. I'm imagining it would be something similar to the improvements to the roundabout at the corner of Battersea park and Battersea bridge if you are aware of it.

Davidk I think a dedicated cycle track along the rye would be great though it does seem a shame that bikes and cars can't seem to share the same space without endangerment and we have to sacrifice more road space to segregate them, which probably means car drivers are going to get to their destinations slower.


I have written to Southwark cycling and Darren Merrill with my concerns thank you for adding your voice.

It was intensely boring.... but one snippet of info that might be of interest to the OP. The Council is soon to start consulting on plans for Peckham Rye East. Which I took to mean basically the route that we've talked about, from Nunhead, down the Rye and on into Burgess Park.


I'm told it's currently a blank piece of paper so plenty of scope to get cycling and walking considerations up the agenda. Watch this space.

Massive wide road at the northern end there, scope for them to do something great.


Are they just looking at the Nunhead Lane to Rye Lane bit, or right up to the LCN at Stuart Road?


Main problem there is the road surface, the nearside is bumpy as hell so you have to cycle far from the kerb, and always get some impatient person in (usually) a white van who wants to zoom up or down the hill at 35mph.

Not sure wulfhound. It was pitched as "Peckham Rye East". But there aren't any more details at this point. It would make sense that it would include some kind of route connection to Rye Lane and Burgess Park.


Plans for unpicking the Bellenden Rd gyratory are pretty advanced so that could all link up quite nicely.


Doesn't change the fact that the Quietways are bollocks and SE Londoners have been shafted over CS5 but that's for another thread :D

@Lilaclou

If you must use this junction could you not start off a second or two before they turn green - assuming you know the phasing of the lights?

You could be in for a long wait until the junction is improved and even longer for drivers to start driving properly.

Hi

I had responses from Darren (councillor), Simon (Southwark council, team leader transport policy) and Andy (Southwark cyclists co-ordinator). There has been money approved from Tfl for the Quietway83 (I didn't know about this so found the proposal online). They suggested that they will be going forward either after new year or middle of next year.


I wrote back to them asking for clarification on times and whether this meant actual work or decision-making.


I also suggested an idea I'll paste what I wrote below


In my opinion this route would benefit from a 2-way cycle way running the whole length starting at the top from the Stuart side road. I don?t think much sacrifice needs to be made to pavement or road space. Most of this section is flats or houses with drives so there is not a lot of parked cars. The east side (currently lightly used for parking) could be dedicated to the cycle route and the west side to parking. I say east side so that it could run to the Nunhead junction, have a cycle traffic light that runs in time with the pedestrian light following over the last section to join up with rye lane (without needing to go round the roundabout one-way system).

Beulah unfortunately with my pedal powered accleration taking off a second or two before the light turns green means the driver turning right who gets in before the traffic would hit me dead on.


I just go by the green man now.

wulfhound Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Massive wide road at the northern end there, scope

> for them to do something great.

>

> Are they just looking at the Nunhead Lane to Rye

> Lane bit, or right up to the LCN at Stuart Road?

>

> Main problem there is the road surface, the

> nearside is bumpy as hell so you have to cycle far

> from the kerb, and always get some impatient

> person in (usually) a white van who wants to zoom

> up or down the hill at 35mph.


I'll second this re: road surface. Always having to either stay pulled out (safer) or in and out around bumps :(

Dangerous either way... Just ploughing on over the bumps - scary!


HP

"Simon (Southwark cyclists co-ordinator" - actually Andy (Southwark cyclists co-ordinator) I believe from here....


http://southwarkcyclists.org.uk/southwark-cyclists-tfl-road-works-ride-26th-october-2015/


Looks like v good work there


And why was the AGM "It was intensely boring...." DavidK? Mind you AGM's often are!


And hear Southwark have TFL money for this scheme now

Yes apologies Nunhead man my mistake I'll edit it.


My request for timescales were referred onto Chris Durban (Cycle Programme Manager). I received an email from him this afternoon I've put in an excerpt below. I also just want to add in my opinion this route down Peckham rye is a highway as it funnels a lot cycle traffic from Nunhead onto the Burgess park route. I may be a little confused as there seems to be lots of definitions quietways, super highways, highways, cycle routes I'm not sure how each are decided on.



"In the New Year a Route Ride will be undertaken and the current Level of Service determined, based on this a set of measures will be proposed that are required. This initial assessment usually takes 12 weeks and is concluded by the agreement of a set of measures and funding required to achieve this. We will then proceed to an outline design and consult locally on this.


There is every likelihood that the Level of Service assessment will come up with proposals similar to those that you have recommended. Current routes being designed involve the removal of parking and creation of dedicated lanes for cyclists so there is nothing that you have proposed that would immediately be ruled out. Southwark Cyclists will also be consulted on the proposals once an outline design has been agreed. I will keep your recommendations on file so that they can be referred to during the scoping phase of the route"

nunhead_man - Just boring in the way that 2 hour meetings about traffic planning tend to be... And not being entirely serious. They are a lovely bunch and we even got free beer and pizza!


Lilaclou - Thank for the info, that tallies with what we talked about on Wednesday. I'll try to keep an eye on it through Southwark Cyclists and report back here. Once it gets to consultation stage it's important that we throw as much weight behind it as possible. Segregated tracks down Peckham Rye East would be transformational but will be fiercely resisted.

Hi David


:-) no probs re the freebies


And we will need to work hard on this one



davidk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> nunhead_man - Just boring in the way that 2 hour

> meetings about traffic planning tend to be... And

> not being entirely serious. They are a lovely

> bunch and we even got free beer and pizza!

>

> Lilaclou - Thank for the info, that tallies with

> what we talked about on Wednesday. I'll try to

> keep an eye on it through Southwark Cyclists and

> report back here. Once it gets to consultation

> stage it's important that we throw as much weight

> behind it as possible. Segregated tracks down

> Peckham Rye East would be transformational but

> will be fiercely resisted.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...