Jump to content

Recommended Posts

erm. we have a brand for our olympics.

great if you're into nu-rave, not so if you like designs which are in anyway pleasant.

http://www.london2012.com/about-newlook-video.html

i'm laughing but in a 'that's a bloody waste of opportunity and money' kind of way.

and Mr Blair says "When people see the new brand, we want them to be inspired to make a positive change in their life"

Is he looking at the same designs as me?

AP

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/826-olympics-brand-launch-joke/
Share on other sites

Cripes I had a quick butchers at work but have no sound on my puter so will have to watch it properly tonight.


Urm, I don't even know what 'new media networks' means, I'm presuming that's referring to watching the OG on your mobile phone?


Is it me or does it just remind you of titles from kids Saturday morning shows? 'Live and Kicking' came to mind straight away, I was even singing the theme tune in my head as I watched it... Saturday Morning TV Maybe it will see the come back of Trevor and Simon, sorely missed.


I kind of like the new logo but wonder if it will already be dated by 2012 as the theme they've picked is very 'now'.

It's a bit, er, 'eighties'. Which might be kinda-cool now (so they say) but will no doubt be hopelessly out of date when we actually get to 2012.


Here's an interesting site (if you like that sort of thing) with all the previous Olympic logos. Design-wise, I'm a Helsinki 1952 man myself.

The designers of the Munich '72 logo clearly lost the plot.


http://www.mapsofworld.com/olympic-trivia/olympic-emblem.html

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a bit, er, 'eighties'. Which might be

> kinda-cool now (so they say) but will no doubt be

> hopelessly out of date when we actually get to

> 2012.

>

> Here's an interesting site (if you like that sort

> of thing) with all the previous Olympic logos.

> Design-wise, I'm a Helsinki 1952 man myself.

> The designers of the Munich '72 logo clearly lost

> the plot.

>

> http://www.mapsofworld.com/olympic-trivia/olympic-

> emblem.html


I love tokyo '64 and am quiet scared by the rome, is that a dog?

I'd put money on the Munich designers having had a hand in the new London logo.

hell, in five years time it'll be a design classic - was the tube map considered "pleasant" when it was first launched? work of bloody genius...


and I repeat, it's INTERACTIVE - you can download it and play with the shapes and colours - that's got to appeal to the kids (or is it just me?) frankly all of us are far too old to be taking part in 2012, but the youth, our unspoiled golden promise of tomorrow - they're the ones that matter here

hi Rosie, please, this can't be compared with the tube map. That was original, perfectly fulfilled it's function and upset some folk because it was thought too abstract. We know that's guff now but that doesn't mean this olympic brand will follow the same journey from ridicule to adoration. Apols if i mislead, 'Pleasant' was the wrong word to use, I generally loath 'pleasant'.


Ahem, being something of a smart-arse in this field, 'interactive' is often used to obscure a dearth of ideas. If a design is not good enough making it all bendy and remixable is just polishing the proverbial turd


AP

I'm not a smart arse in this field but I don't like it either. I think of Olympic logos on flags and banners and on the chest of beach volleyball players and other athletes. As a branding excercise the interactive "thing" is probably great but the logo is not something I, as a Londoner, feel proud of.


To me, this:

http://www.london2012.com/img/logo/medium-pink-yellow.png

is not very nice. Someone's also just pointed out to me that it says 2012.

AnotherPaul Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> hi Rosie, please, this can't be compared with the

> tube map. That was original, perfectly fulfilled

> it's function and upset some folk because it was

> thought too abstract. We know that's guff now but

> that doesn't mean this olympic brand will follow

> the same journey from ridicule to adoration.


ok, I'm not going to win this one am I? Clearly it's not the tube map, but neither is it entirely without merit. and it's got people talking at least... you wait and see, some of them will say good things - a designer friend of mine (see I know something about it too) captured my sentiments:


"it?ll probably grow on me, but I?m hating the way the british public (who have no taste) are getting all knee-jerk- arsey over a logo, and start demanding that the old logo (which truly was bland rubbish) is reinstated"

I don't think it's entirely without merit. As a bit of design, it's actually quite clever.

Anyone who has worked at such a task (ie trying to come-up with something to please a zillion committees, all of whom have their own different ideas about what the final product should be) will know what an impossible task it is. I think, when you look at it, you can see it ticking lots of boxes which were no doubt requested. I say congrats to the designers for getting the job!


But I still find it hard to like, mainly because I think it looks old-fashioned. Retro can be cool, if done well. Old-fashioned can't be.

lorkes i don't want that old one either, that was virtually the old tory logo. I find it interestin that when we want to win the olympics we come across all red white and blue, classical type and billowing flags. once we've got the games we go all fluro bonkers. very strange, a form of national schizophrenia?


That's an incredibly snotty comment from said designer. "?the british public (who have no taste)?". Boo!

Have to admit, the new logo does look a bit... unusual. You hardly notice the "2012" and the "London" and rings elements. And, clearly, the designer has been listening to Klaxons and CSS.


However I think it's a bit mean and lazy to jump on the critical bandwagon. It's really easy to slag something off but requires a bit of brainpower to suggest what you'd do instead. At least this logo is polarising opinions - surely a good sign? It's bright, dynamic and very now. I'd rather that than some dull, corporate piece of blandness designed not to offend anyone. The logos we remember are the ones that went out on a limb and captured the zeitgeist, like Mexico '68.

I'd rather that it grew on me than we spend more money on getting another one. In fact the more I look at it the more it looks like a camp person, hand on hip and lifting up a limp wrist in a


http://www.skynews.com.au/photos/SkyNews_Image_20070309053609.jpg style.


Or Lisa Simpson.


[edited once]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Miranda Sawyer of the (once) Observer has done a piece on festival on Insta which might be of-interest.  Councils are private companies, imo. They make money for themselves, imo.  I do not think by law that they have to follow anything brought up by a consultation, this is for 'face' only - hence, LTNs and everything else.  
    • My understanding is the "free event" is 100% Gala, nothing to do with the council. Obviously Gala will still make money from the food & drink that they are trying to coerce punters into buying on their social media posts. Their costs will be negligible due to already having the infrastructure in place for Gala. So Gala are trying to appear community minded by providing this "free event", but the real goal is to set a precedent for a fourth day's festival - which surely no one could possibly object to?!? - in preparation for applying (again) for two three-day festivals spread over two weekends. It's only another two days, right, and the site & equipment is already there, so why would anyone object?!? More money for the council, much more money for Gala, win-win right? But yet another week of our park taken away from us, too, and another 18,000 people trampling & littering the park, and another week of disturbance for the native birds & wildlife...
    • Meson Don Felipe on The Cut was my go to place for many years. Though it's now many years since I was there. 10-15 minute walk from the Tate. If you go can you tell me what it's like nowadays?
    • Doubt you would have got much change out of £150.00 for battery and certainly having forked out for it, best to use your car. I recently sold  my car via webuyanycar.com - very pleasant experience & was roughly what I was expecting. Pop your bangers reg jnto their website to get an idea of price - they do send e mails once a fortnight/month just as an aid for you. Easy enough to delete - don’t even have to read valuation. They literally buy any car - if you can’t get it to them, they will charge you to get it there or recommend a co that will do it for you. Must say, mine was a 2014 reg and whilst a bit suspicious, paid extra to get money into my account as needed it for next car but was assured funds had I not gone down route I took would be in my account within 5 days. I now live in the country - every time I have been back to Dulwich and surrounding area, normally get a fine for driving at wrong time or parking at  wrong time so if I drive now, park in West or East Dulwich and do everything else by public transport and walking.  Were I still to be living in ED then before I left was pondering this very issue but since I have been back regularly for health reason I no longer drive but take the train and then buses, walk or Uber. Much cheaper than running a car and had I stayed, that would have been the course I would have taken. I don’t go out everyday, have an allotment or job to go to or family so in my case, would be cheaper not to have a car.  Was truely shocked   at the cost of second hand cars…..but where I now live only has a smattering of buses so no choice but to have wheels to get from A to B etc.          
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...