Jump to content

Recommended Posts

True - much sadness in the world is attributed to money and an unhealthy love of the dollar. But to be fair, I do think that's an easier position to to take if, like me, you don't actually have much.


I think, on reflection, it's impossible to intellectualise marriage as a concept because it's a largely emotional decision which, on paper, doesn't look entirely rational, i.e this idea that you meet in your 20's or 30's and maintain the same shared interests, goals, personalities, on parallel lines for the next 50 or 60 years. Nice idea to strive for, and I respectfully tip my hat to all those on that journey, but as society changes I can't help thinking there are more realistic, practical ways to commit to each other which might help stop one partner losing their shirt if it doesn't work out.

Although ante-nuptial settlements (as they have always been termed in this country) have never been legally enforceable they have nonetheless been a standard feature with toffs/the landed gentry of this great land of ours since time immemorial. I know this as back in the last millennium when I was nobbutalad I worked for a very grand firm of solicitors indeed. Although my position was a lowly one it did involve sometimes assisting with the drafting or administration of such trusts. But this was a rarified class of people for whom land meant all, and a "good" marriage was nothing to do with being romantic. This did not mean the union in question was not a romantic one - just that the ANS was regarded in much the same way as taking out the marriage licence or booking the church.
No-one goes into marriage thinking it will end (or very few do) but many marriages do indeed end in divorce, however determined the parties might have been that it would last for ever. In second or further marriages where (a) there may be considerable assets which might have accrued to one partner before the marriage and (b) having already been divorced the parties are more aware that shit happens, they just seem to be common sense.

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did you know that if you invite your lover to live

> in your home, within only 6 months, they have

> rights to your property.


Where does this information come from, and are there ways around it such as paying rent so that there is an economic agreement rather than a purely romantic one?

jollybaby Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mr JB and I got engaged a couple of weeks ago and

> I wouldn't consider having a prenup. I can't

> think of anything more negative and contradictory

> to the idea of marriage. This is despite the fact

> that both our parents are divorced.


I'm with you there.

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did you know that if you invite your lover to live

> in your home, within only 6 months, they have

> rights to your property.


People don't get property rights just by moving in with someone. However there are circumstances where a cohabiting couple can be ordered by the Court to share in a property in various proportions, depending on how long they have been together and what each have contributed to the home and the relationship. If an unmarried couple buy their home in joint names, there is a case that says the presumption is that they own it in equal shares - but that presumption can also be overruled by the Court.

Once you have kids pre nups should end. Even in this day and age a women can have to give up everything career wise once she becomes pregnant and a partnership should be a partnership. Do we really want to encourage the increasingly individualistic nature of society? (Although i still want a Bentley).


Also isn't marriage a commitment? A pre nup is the opposite of commitment, why bother getting married?

  • 2 months later...

I agree that if you feel you need a prenup you shouldnt be getting married in the first place! The two are poles apart.


I also have been at the receiving end of losing 50% of everything through no "fault" of my own having shared everything and earned significantly more than my ex during the marriage.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...