Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Once, long ago, when a man felt thirsty he could, all by himself and quite unaided and unprompted by lifestyle magazines, daytime TV presenters, and that smug git in the office who goes to the gym at lunchtimes, walk to the tap and pour himself a glass of water.


This, combined with a cup or two of tea, perhaps a juice in the morning, and something passable but inexpensive with his meal, was enough to get him through the day.


But now he must sit, Evian bottle constantly present, swigging every few minutes lest the feared and mighty dehydration monster attacks him and shrivels his dermis, dries his eyes to spent husks, and allows millions of toxins unchecked access to his pancreatic lining (or something).


Swig swig. Swig. Mummy. Another swig.

Can I just say how well presented I thought Ted's lament was. Bottled water is becoming far too fashionable these days. So much so, that now even infants are complaining to mum and dad that they don't get a dose of Pelegrino on the taxpayers ticket like the brats in the rest of the E.U do.


Has anyone seen the recent ad featuring low clalorie water. What's next? Are Volvic going to re-package earth, wind and fire?

Bottled water is the bane of the planet man. Nowt wrong with the stuff from the taps. At least we are lucky enough to have a water supply.


Where my mum lives in the Borders there is no water supply and her water is run-off from the hills into a tank and thence to the hoose. Yon hills are covered in sheep dontcha know. She recently had her water tested by the environmental health people and it failed on the presence of Ecoli bacteria, and that's with a filtration system. Yum!

I can tell from this thread that none of you have had kidney stones. I know someone who has and believe me after that kind of pain you'd spend the rest of your life sipping almost any available liquid for fear they return. I'll just leave you male cynics with one thought. If kidney stones can't be broken up with a lazer beam (and many can't) then they have to be smashed up "by hand" during surgery, and there's only one way in........

Leaglebeagle I have kidney stones and had kidney surgery and I tell no lie I drink a minimum of 3 litres of water a day, more in the summer mainly due to fear of more kindey issues! As a result I have spent many an hour searching for toilets when out and about so can sympathise with comutedshorty.


99% of it comes from a tap - far cheaper and nearly as yummy.

I have suffered with occasional pain from kidney stones since my twenties, it's like a disease, always with you and you do anything necessary to prevent another attack.


I gave up booze and did not miss it one bit, as it was booze which incited it with the dehydration. I drink lots of water and not much milk other than for cereals, because of the calcium which forms the stones. Whitebait is not recommended either because of the tiny bones, but I still indulge sometimes as it's sooo delicious.


My favourite water for taste is Buxton by a streak. When I go to the swimming pool and people have a bottle at the end of the length to sip, I find that idiotic, as no-one I ever knew became dehydrated whilst swimming.


I use tap water and fill bottles which are kept chilled in the fridge and it is like a different drink, I rarely drink it straight out of the tap unless it's in the heart of winter. Thames water tastes good though like sophiesofa says.


To stop the constant P***ing add some elderflower cordial, it doesn't pass through your system quite so quick Davy Watts.

Obviously, you know, always read the label, and pregnant women, children and people with kidney stones please speak to your pharmacist, but in general you can trace the decline of this nation to the moment when adults decided that walking around attached to the teat all day was acceptable.


A faint miasma of dehydration is good for the humours. It keeps sweating to a minimum and discourages unmanly thoughts in a woman.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...