Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"BBW - I can assue you that I have never had any domestic staff."


You disappoint me Sean, you disappoint me deeply. I thought that as a moderator you'd be relying on the enforced services of an enslaved typist to convey your authoritarian addresses in your capacity as a helper elf to the administrator.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> BBW - I can assue you that I have never had any

> domestic staff, Any empathy with the Barnoness is

> entirely due to a distaste for mobs, coupled with

> a "sacking for everything" culture which seems to

> be afoot


Unless you happen to be a member of the RMT....running red lights, boozing on the job, opening doors on the wrong side of the train...no worries.

I have a professional job and must not bring myself or profession into disrepute. I do everything legit and if I am not sure I take professional advice to make sure I am doing things legally or erronthe side of caution.I do not have the resources of Lady Scotland but I do follow procedures. I think it stinks. What happened with David Blunkett and others that employed those they should not have?

If you're the minister for transport and you get caught for speeding, what should happen?


A. Fine / Ban (as appropriate) - like everyone else.

B. Sacked, stripped and publicly flogged on live television


The notion that someone should face and entirely different punishment - for a civil offence - other than that which the law requires, is complete nonsense.

I think Baroness Scotland should have resigned - if there was any possibility of her accidental employment of a Tongan housekeeper leading to someone dying and a criminal conviction.


Sadly, this is about accidentally employing a Tongan housekeeper without the right to work, not stacking-up on booze and wielding a potentially lethal weapon on a public highway.

The current fashion for demanding resignations over the most inconsequential of issues has led to a digging-in amongst politicians, civil servants and industry bigwigs, to the point that hardly anyone will go - ever - unless someone literally trusses them up and carries them out of the door.


It's part of the reason why when there is an actual scandal - like a real proper scandal (remember them?) - no-one goes.

I make you right on that one *Bob*.

And as for getting Joanna Whalley to star in a film on the matter, I should bleedin' cocoa.

And as for the Pet Shop Boys writing the theme song, you're havin' a Turkish, aincha?

And as for getting a singer of Dusty Springfield's calibre to perform said song, fackorfaahtoutofit.

It's a bit like the reverse of when someone, maybe your uncle, usually restricts himself to dry and pithy observations, to the extent that you almost think they don't have an opinion, and then *BAM* out of nowhere they start talking all serious-like about a subject. It makes you pay more attention....

Incidentally, Scotland is also being investigated for ?170,000 of expenses for which she might not have been entitled to.


But naturally the Tongan Housekeeper incident (from which she was set to profit ZILCH) is a tastier tabloid morsel.


And anyway.. expenses.. been there.. boo-ring, eh?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We don’t even need Victorian values. Many of theses monstrosities are made by Japanese companies but would never be sold in Japan because in Japan the dimensions of cars are strictly regulated due to their narrow street layout. I grew up in terraced streets in the 1970s, playing football and even cricket among the then relatively few parked cars. To walk through ED and see every square inch of every street taken up by a parked car and not a child playing is like a Silent Spring.
    • Word to the wise: please be careful if you’re around Dulwich Village during the school run.  While walking on the pavement down Carlton Avenue this morning c. 8.45am, I was hit from behind by a child riding a bicycle. When I raised this with his father, he (the father) behaved inappropriately. I highlight the following tactics deployed against me, so if you choose to say anything, you may come off better in any exchange than I. The father chose to make it more about how I reacted, rather than what had happened, namely that his son was riding on a pavement, seemingly without supervision, out of his father’s line of sight. The father claimed I was over-reacting, said that his son was 4-years old and didn’t do it deliberately. He didn’t ask me if I was alright. And apologised with a ‘but’: “I’m sorry if he hit your leg, but your reaction is over the top.”  He took no responsibility for his child’s action or his lack of parental supervision. As I walked away, I heard him and two other adults talking and laughing about my reaction – yes, laughing.  I don’t think he or his son learned anything useful from the incident about keeping themselves and others safe, such that it would change their behaviour. I did and share it here as to place, time, nature of incident, minimising tactics etc. as a heads-up to others. I didn’t sustain any injuries or damage to my clothing or property. Others who are older/younger, have mobility issues, walk with buggies, children, pets etc. may fare differently. Forewarned is forearmed, guys.
    • Found on Goodrich Rd
    • Very good news! The Palmerston flourished under Jamie, so Franklins will be in safe hands, I'm sure
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...