Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"BBW - I can assue you that I have never had any domestic staff."


You disappoint me Sean, you disappoint me deeply. I thought that as a moderator you'd be relying on the enforced services of an enslaved typist to convey your authoritarian addresses in your capacity as a helper elf to the administrator.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> BBW - I can assue you that I have never had any

> domestic staff, Any empathy with the Barnoness is

> entirely due to a distaste for mobs, coupled with

> a "sacking for everything" culture which seems to

> be afoot


Unless you happen to be a member of the RMT....running red lights, boozing on the job, opening doors on the wrong side of the train...no worries.

I have a professional job and must not bring myself or profession into disrepute. I do everything legit and if I am not sure I take professional advice to make sure I am doing things legally or erronthe side of caution.I do not have the resources of Lady Scotland but I do follow procedures. I think it stinks. What happened with David Blunkett and others that employed those they should not have?

If you're the minister for transport and you get caught for speeding, what should happen?


A. Fine / Ban (as appropriate) - like everyone else.

B. Sacked, stripped and publicly flogged on live television


The notion that someone should face and entirely different punishment - for a civil offence - other than that which the law requires, is complete nonsense.

I think Baroness Scotland should have resigned - if there was any possibility of her accidental employment of a Tongan housekeeper leading to someone dying and a criminal conviction.


Sadly, this is about accidentally employing a Tongan housekeeper without the right to work, not stacking-up on booze and wielding a potentially lethal weapon on a public highway.

The current fashion for demanding resignations over the most inconsequential of issues has led to a digging-in amongst politicians, civil servants and industry bigwigs, to the point that hardly anyone will go - ever - unless someone literally trusses them up and carries them out of the door.


It's part of the reason why when there is an actual scandal - like a real proper scandal (remember them?) - no-one goes.

I make you right on that one *Bob*.

And as for getting Joanna Whalley to star in a film on the matter, I should bleedin' cocoa.

And as for the Pet Shop Boys writing the theme song, you're havin' a Turkish, aincha?

And as for getting a singer of Dusty Springfield's calibre to perform said song, fackorfaahtoutofit.

It's a bit like the reverse of when someone, maybe your uncle, usually restricts himself to dry and pithy observations, to the extent that you almost think they don't have an opinion, and then *BAM* out of nowhere they start talking all serious-like about a subject. It makes you pay more attention....

Incidentally, Scotland is also being investigated for ?170,000 of expenses for which she might not have been entitled to.


But naturally the Tongan Housekeeper incident (from which she was set to profit ZILCH) is a tastier tabloid morsel.


And anyway.. expenses.. been there.. boo-ring, eh?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I will buy you a frothy coffee from anywhere you like on Lordship Lane if that happens. Most of these costs never get recovered from the drivers that caused them. The photo shows a car that's been left on the zigzags protecting the crossing. Pedestrians crossing East to West and drivers heading South won't see each other until the pedestrians are in the road. That is a dangerous position to leave a car in. (I don't know if it's stil there, obviously).
    • Seems a pretty dangerous position to me - apart from getting in the way of pedestrians trying to cross the road large vehicles heading south have to edge into the oncoming traffic lane to get past. I've got a normal-sized car and had to squeeze through a gap the other day.  
    • When a car is left damaged by the road-side it may be that the insurer is tasked with recovering the vehicle to assess it and (possibly) take it for repair. Only if it is in a dangerous position will the police recover it - which saves money for the tax-payer.  You may also have some recovery options with e.g. the AA (other organisations are available). Were the car to have been stolen or abandoned then it will take some time to sort this out, and again unless the vehicle is in a dangerous position the police won't be rushing to deal with that. Not sure who the 'they' are in this case.
    • I wouldn't like to speculate, Sue. Not my thing. Teddy Boy is your man on the ground for that sort of first-hand detail. It's six points for driving without insurance and six points for using a phone, so that's an automatic ban of at least six months. They're going to be practically uninsurable for a considerable period after that. So, nobody's hurt, a clearly crap driver is off the road for some time and the good burghers of SE22 get a lovely, shiny new post - probably paid for by the driver. Every cloud, and that. If only Franklins wasn't changing hands, Lordship Lane would be almost perfect.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...