Jump to content

any legal experts who can answer a question about child maintenance please?


Recommended Posts

I have applied for an appointment with a family mediation firm but in the mean time wondered if anyone could tell me the answer to this?


My partner left last year. We weren't married tho we had lived together for years. Our eldest child (aged 4) has just started reception and our youngest child (aged 2) has 2 days a week in a nanny share.

if the child maintenance he is legally required to pay is around ?400 a month, yet he works full time and I work 2 days a week (so nanny share needed 2 days a week for youngest and after school pick ups by a childminder needed twice a week for my eldest) is it the case that he doesn't have to pay for any of the childcare? That it's supposed to be included in the general maintenance equation?

I've been told different things by different people?any light you can shed forum?

Thanks Mick Mac, but why would childcare be considered as my work needs as opposed to his work needs? i.e if I went to work and refused to pay for childcare then he would have to stop working altogether or miss work twice a week to look after our children? We both have parental responsibility so surely our work needs and childcare needs are the same if we both work? If we both want to go to work to earn money then can it really be that only one parent has to pay for childcare to facilitate that, even if that parent earns a fraction of what the other parent earns? I hope not, agh!

If you've gone to the CSA and had the maintenance calculated by them then the amount they set is it, and:

- If he had to pay travel costs (and accommodation) to visit his child, he wouldn't be able to subtract that, or part of it, from the amount due to the CSA.

- If he had to buy clothing for the child because you refused to give an overnight / weekend bag of clothes when staying with him, he could not deduct it from amount due to CSA.

I'm assuming when you say 'legally required' you mean CSA.

Therefore, you'll need to discuss your needs with the ex if you want to increase from the 'legal amount'.

I understand that recently the CSA introduced a 20% 'admin cost' to be added to the monthly amount due from the parent paying maintenance, if this is the case for him perhaps you could agree to not go through the CSA and fix maintenance at ?720 (if that would help you).


Couple of options there but I'm making assumptions and don't have time to caviat everything I've said to handle all possible situations you may actually be in.


ETA: My understanding for the reason the CSA started adding the 20% is to try to get the couples to agree maintenance themselves (and reduce workload on the CSA, which is creaking at the seams and totally overwhelmed). Be interested to know if that 20% IS actually being enforced.

So, one half of a couple leaves the other, leaves the two young children behind, and then never has to worry again about the cost of their childcare? How can anyone even think that is logical or acceptable? Presumably HelloSailor has "work needs" because she needs to provide for the children apart from anything else. The alternative is to give up work and become totally dependent on benefits.

tomskip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So, one half of a couple leaves the other, leaves

> the two young children behind, and then never has

> to worry again about the cost of their childcare?

> How can anyone even think that is logical or

> acceptable? Presumably HelloSailor has "work

> needs" because she needs to provide for the

> children apart from anything else. The alternative

> is to give up work and become totally dependent on

> benefits.


Yes Tomskip, that looks about the size of it from my research..

If I work I get ?64 a day before tax. I will now need to pay ?85 a day childcare, so if I work and my ex doesn't have to contribute anything to childcare, I will lose 20 quid a day by working, while he pays no childcare costs.

This means me not working at all to look after our children or paying the entire childcare amount even tho it means I'm losing money simply in order to facilitate him earning 60k a year. The alternative to me working for a loss is to have benefits.

*Note to self* - if I get up to the pearly gates and reincarnation exists, come back as a man.

Its a terrible situation to be in, and one shared by so many single parents. As a family unit, your housing costs must now be very much higher (?) but even so a contribution of ?400 for two children seems very low from someone earning a salary like that.

Is the ?400 a definite figure as advised by the CMS?


https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/325219/how-we-work-out-child-maintenance.pdf


Looking at this, if your partner earns ?60k gross per year the weekly earnings figure would be ?1,183 a week and for 2 kids maintenance is 16% of the first ?800 pounds of gross income and 12% of any income after that.


I'm guessing that your partner's gross income must be reduced by his pension payments/expenses or other children he supports and/or by having your kids on a shared custody basis but that's all within the rules of the Child Maintenance Service, as shitty as it is.


I know this might sound stupid but is there any chance of trying to work something out with your ex-partner without the need to external agencies involved?

What a horrible situation. Have you looked at everything that might be available to help you with the childcare costs? If your nanny and child minder are OFSTED registered (very easy to sort out if not) then you should be eligible for tax credit support. Is it worth looking into whether you might be eligible for some free nursery childcare (depends on your income) right now (ie while your youngest is 2) and, if not, looking at nursery places for when they turn 3? Does the school have an after-school club (might be cheaper). Might it be possible to find someone with whom you can buddy up with on the after-school care (ie you do a pick up a couple of days for them etc)


This is quite helpful https://www.gov.uk/help-with-childcare-costs/tax-credits.


Obviously the most equitable thing would be for your ex to contribute fairly, but it might be worth establishing how you can keep working without his paying for childcare costs. I do think its worth keeping your hand in and the childcare crisis years (ie its just impossible) don't last that long, though it can feel like it.


Good luck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...