Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As a walker of a single pet I want to say I am heartily sick of my dog being ganged up on by packs of other dogs being walked at Nunhead Cemetery by professional walkers with more dogs than they can properly handle.


I have already been squeezed out by the dog walking mafia at Peckham Rye park and take refuge in Sydenham Hill woods where sensibly walking is restricted to 3 dogs per person.


Today, for the umpteenth time I had to endure profuse apologies from said walkers and comments about having him 'Done' so their dogs dont attack.


Why dont you try cutting your profits by walking a smaller number of dogs that you can actually control?


I have complained to Southwark council and the Friends of Nunhead Cemetery about this.


I presume I am not the only one.

Sorry to hear this Ben. What time do you walk? I walk most days in peckham and have never had my dog set upon? I certainly see a one or two dog walkers, but their dogs seem perfectly happy amongst themselves. Are you walking a lady dog who is coming into season? I am not suggesting it is your fault, but just intrigued.

We walk at various times. He's a dog who we are looking at breeding so comments about having him 'Done' arent appropriate.


Dogs can get rough and tumble and I have no problem with that at all and can differentiate between rough housing and being set on and when two dog walkers have 5 or 6 dogs a piece and are walking together you get a different mentality and even normally sociable dogs are in groups they become a pack, which is a different mindset.


Our dog, a cocker, is only interested in scuttling around in the undergrowth. He isnt interested in humans or other dogs. He doesnt jump up at people or pay any special interest in other animals......apart from Squirrels.


I have no objection to professional dog walkers, we use someone ourselves when we are away but I am sick of having to jump in and protect him from 8 or 9 other dogs who walkers assure me are just being friendly.


He doesnt get set on in Sydenham Hill woods where large groups arent allowed, only Nunhead where professional dog walkers take out groups that to my mind are larger than they can control. This happens too often to be an occasional event.

The sensible solution firstly is to not make "money" the object here with "packing them all in" (walking as many as you possibly can) - its about the dog... or secondly, if the dog walkers are going to be walking with large packs, don't go walking with your mate who also has a pack him or herself, so that anyone passing by, does not feel intimidated by an approaching "set of hounds", wondering if all are tamed/aggressive as we have to remember, not all are dog-lovers out there and actually fear dogs ??!! Especially if half of them are not on leads !!! I have walked my dog simply on a stroll in Peckham Rye Park and I often can see those who are actually not keen on dogs - just from their actions/behaviour where they may just create a distance as they pass you by... Dog-walkers should limit their numbers to 3 per head - as they do in Sydenham Hill and other named parks...

Pommie, what on earth has this question got to do with the price of eggs???


Whether my dog is a Pitbull, a Pomeranian or a Border Terrier is irrelevant.


The point at issue is that whenever I walk him at Nunhead cemetary and pass a pack of hounds he gets attacked.


I re-state what I said above. I have no problem with dog rough and tumble. I am talking about 10 dogs (where two commercial walkers merge) going into pack mentality and causing me to have to drag my dog into a place of safety.


If this wasnt the case then why do the commercial dog walkers jump in, drag their charges off and apologise profusely?


Today I took him to Sydenham Hill Woods, where the Dulwich Wood society prohibits commercial dog walking. The result being our dog has a lovely time. Being an un-neutered male he occasionally gets unwarranted attention but because it is just one dog it isnt a problem and their owners and I share a joke about it.


The breed of dog has absolutely no bearing on the problem we encounter.

Let me put a scenario to you Pommie... parent(s) with children strolling thru' the park/cemetery and this is something I regularly see there whilst on walkabout with my dog too..... lets take for eg...On approach is a Handler/Walker with a number of dogs in hand walking towards them - 2 running off-lead... one of the dogs playfully comes at the small child followed by another and knocks the child over... child starts to cry... Handler/Walker apologises profusely... Please don't tell me that the question that springs to mind is, what breed is the child or has he/she been done...??!!!


Surely the point here, is that this number of dogs on approach to anyone, whereby 1 or 2 are not fully under control because the handler is trying to manage firstly all the leads in his/her hands and at the same time the dogs off-lead, is just simply unacceptable !!

I think Pommie you are truly missing the point here... nobody is discussing pedigrees/dogs in homes etc - I have friends who only care for dogs who DO need homes/Rescues - did you read the original post about the fact that 5-8 dogs per Handler/Walker is what we are discussing here... I have nothing against Walkers/Handlers but just the number per person is the problem.... maybe you should read from the start..
I agree Jeremy - I was speaking in terms of being a dog-owner myself as well as looking at the perspective too from those who aren't and I cannot believe the intelligence of the response of dear ole Lindylou - its sad she actually hasn't got much regards for the place she was perhaps raised within by damming our great South London... If she actually met me, I think she'd think twice before using such words as "integrate" to my face to be perfectly frank - obviously also lacks education along the lines methinks...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...