Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Had phonecall from upset friend who was told by the school that there was no chance of their child getting into Goodrich nursery as the catchment is 200m at the mo????


I know this is true for Heber but Goodrich has a big nursery. Things are bad but this is way beyond a joke.


Did anyone get in who lives further? (obviously without siblings etc)

It seems to have shrunk in that year, extra siblings due to bulge class? Goodrich said they go on distance from the nursery measured by some council system. If there are no nursery places for the local children then thats one major issue that needs to be addressed. If people have been faking their addresses for the last few years thats another.


There is going to be a government 'scrutiny' meeting in ED in the 12th of October on primary and nursery places, where we should get some answers. Place to be anounced but open to public and the more the merrier!


There is a facebook site to unite parents concerned about the crisis in local school places


http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=120669739604&ref=ts

PS do really want to know if admissions catchment for nursery has shrunk again this yeart as it predicts places next!

Entry to reception years is governed by Southwark admission ctriteria but these don't apply to nursery places .

It seems that the individual school decides this.

Recent post from Mellors on different thread seems to suggest that primary schools file nursery applications by D. O. B.

This was the case many moons ago at Goodrich and was another way the education system disadvantaged the summer born so I'm hoping it isn't still the system used.

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pointing out the obvious maybe ,but unlike the

> statutory obligation to provide education for all

> 5 year olds, there is no legal requirement for

> Southwark to provide nursery places for all.


Your point being? We should put up or shut up?


There are NO places for first borns in vast areas of Se22, think of it as an early warning system for primary places!!

I posted because I felt that reacting to the shortfall in school nursery places in the same way that people are reacting to the shortage of primary school places in this part of the borough was slightly odd.

Southwark doesn't have an obligation to provide places for all it's 3 year olds in school nurseries in the same way that it does for primary school age children

As far as I know there's always been a shortfall in nursery places,although the situation has improved in recent years.

There is obviously a problem at present with a shortage of primary school places in this part of the borough and this clearly needs addressing.

But I don't think that you can automatically assume that the shortfall in nursery places is a direct indicator of a shortage of primary school places.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am delighted to hear the development was approved.  In my opinion, the UK is building far too little housing. And unless we build on green belts, the only solution is to increase the density of our cities, which is exactly what this scheme achieves.  Where I'm from (France), planning is generally looser and in my home city it's common to see single dwellings being razed to make way for a 5-6 story block of flats, even in city centres. Does it change the character of the local area? For sure! But I don't see another way to provide the supply to meet demand and provide ample supply of housing for a growing population. My personal experience is that in the UK, there is a lot more time spent on consultations, on achieving a perfect outcome for everyone. This results in generally better and more harmonious building than in France, but it makes things slower and more costly, with the need to coordinate many consultants.  It's interesting to compare France and the UK as they have similar populations and population growth, with an economy centred on a huge capital city. When you look at the number of houses/flats built in France and the UK over the past 10 years, the result is pretty striking. # France UK Difference 2023 298,100 150,370 -147,730 2022 392,100 182,070 -210,030 2021 410,000 177,160 -232,840 2020 368,800 129,440 -239,360 2019 387,700 153,000 -234,700 2018 401,200 168,610 -232,590 2017 434,700 164,110 -270,590 2016 370,000 155,150 -214,850 2015 341,000 148,150 -192,850 2014 336,900 140,760 -196,140 2013 357,900 124,790 -233,110 2012 382,300 101,020 -281,280 Total 4,480,700 1,794,630 -2,686,070 Average 373,392 149,553 -223,839 When HS1 was built, the French engineers (it was built with the French high-speed signalling) were surprised at how Brits wanted to "gold-plate" everything. The UK arguably has the best, most effective, more reliable, more well-equipped high-speed line in the world, but we've only got 68 miles of it and it cost 2.5 times what it cost the French to build a line extension at the same time.  In my view, there's no magic wand: just deciding who will be the losers. In France, people in established neighbourhoods my lose out as they see them change dramatically, while the new entrants benefit from a much higher supply of housing (and thus cheaper housing). In the UK, we give greater priority to preserving the lifestyle and amenity of the established dwellers over the new entrants who lose out as the supply is choked and prices are higher. A final point of comparison would be the price per square foot of property in Greater Paris is £467 while in Greater London it's £667 - 30% cheaper!
    • This web page lists some companies that recycle CDs https://www.reducereuserecycle.co.uk/where_can_I_recycle/cds_and_dvds.php  
    • I heard it as well, woke me up, very strange.  I don't care for myself but I do worry for people with children and animals, it is a nuisance and happens more and more nowadays.
    • Has that ever actually happened? The bags are quite bright, and don't blend in with the pavement, so are quite noticeable. But surely there can't be many  cases where someone has bothered to put the s**t in a bag,  but then just leaves the bag on the pavement?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...