Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"This compares with the previous best-selling adult hardback, Thomas Harris' Hannibal, which has sold 298,000 copies since it was published in 1999."


I bought and read Hannibal and found it disappointing in the end.


I was in Waterstones at lunchtime and the woman in front of me was buying the Dan Brown book - did not realise it was only out yesaterday.

I, on the other hand, was buying "Revolutionary Road" - ask me in a month and i'll tell you if its any good, I'm not the fastest reader.

I think this is one of those sneering threads Quids comes up with when he's excrutiatingly bored. Tomorrows topic of debate will no doubt be something to do with lottery tickets being value for money, or if pocket money should be taxed.


I know.


Should today's children in primary education of be forced to endure really rough Izal toilet paper to prepare them for future hardship, like in the 70/80's?

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wolfie, the problem with Izal wasn't it roughness,

> in fact it was the opposite, it was too smooth and

> non-absorbant, so your arse ended up looking like

> a pre-cooked butter basted turkey...


RD, contortionist or exhibitionist? I think we should be told.

Unless it's not falling out the back of an aid flight over Afghanistan, you only usually encounter the stuff 'en masse' in pikey shops like Asda and Iceland where you can pick up a roll of Izal glass/toilet paper for 6p. The only other places you can get it is hardware shops and Target Arms with all the rest of the memorabilia.


Buy a family pack and they'll chuck in an Anderson shelter for free.

Oh and in case any Johnny foreigners are wondering what on earth Izal is. It's a course toilet paper introduced by Lloyd George's war cabinet to inspire bravery in soldiers on the trenches because any firing squad is preferable to having to scrape your arse with the this notoriously eye watering toilet paper.


It was introduced by Neath's conservative government to foster a bit of character in the education system. It did just that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's lovely! Good for them!
    • You’ve taken the time to write quite a long post explaining why you think as you do. But as I pointed out earlier in the thread most young people look pretty much the same they tend to wear different clothes on different occasions and unless there’s something overwhelmingly stand out about their appearance such descriptions do not help  -  there’s probably about 25,000 teenagers within walking distance of the park. Any description could apply to many of them. The police have the descriptions leave it to them.  I hope you won’t stop going to the park, to reassure yourself go onto the Metropolitan police crime site and you’ll see that Peckham Rye Park is a very safe place to be. 
    • Aria did a good job fixing a leak in our bathroom. He was very thorough and made two extra visits to make sure the job was done well. Highly recommended.
    • As a diminutive (5ft 1) woman who regularly attends the park with her four children - all under 5; two of them (twins) in a push-chair - the thread caught my eye. If there identifiable troublemakers likely to be there I want to know what they look like so I can avoid them. Isn't that "strange" of me, wishing to avoid harm coming to my children?? 😲 I have been discussing the ludicrous responses to this thread 🧵 (which I bet £100 exclusively emanate from bourgeois native Brits) with work colleagues (you would be hard pressed to find a more 'diverse' bunch in terms of age and ethnicity - except we are all female). One colleague (a Ukranian lady) made a perceptive observation that everyone seemed to agree with. When British newspapers and news websites mention an offender (e.g. 'police are asking the general public for assistance in seeking the alleged offender who is a middle-aged male'), she always assumes the offender is not of white British heritage since, if the offender is white this is usually mentioned, but seldom the other way around. Until recently racial prejudice was a thing of the past (unless in the most hardcore of families), now it is creeping back and one important factor is the perception that the indigenous general public are not being treated fairly with this sort of dishonest - some would say activist - reportage. An attitude that clearly informed the bizarre claim that my concerned inquiry was  "strange". Fact is it was anything but strange. What is strange is people denying the evidence of their own eyes and - in this case - casting aspersions on a concerned parent. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...