Jump to content

Recommended Posts

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well we all have our views don't we hellosailor ?

> I think it's inflamatory and aggresive to use

> words like "jeering " .

>


You think it's inflammatory and aggressive to use the word 'jeering'?

I'm genuinely perplexed.

Perhaps you know a different definition from me?

I think it's really bad forum etiquette to start a thread about a private message, naming the person who sent it and publishing the content or alluding to what it was about.


If you're prepared to post on a public forum, and be quite antagonistic with it, then you can reasonably expect to receive a response on the forum or by PM.


I don't read the family room posts but from what I've seen of Londonmix on other parts of the forum comes across as a reasonable, fair and interesting poster whose contributions are worth reading. Increasingly rare qualities these days, in my opinion. LM has already politely explained their use of the word jerk and why they PMd rather than derailed the thread so no need to go on about other ridiculous things it could have meant. I'd be horrified if someone started a thread about a PM I'd sent. It's unnecessary and unpleasant behaviour.


If you're being "cyber-bullied" or receiving offensive, abusive PMs then that's another matter entirely. Nothing to see here tho.

Bit rich coming from die hard clique needy


numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's really bad forum etiquette to start a

> thread about a private message, naming the person

> who sent it and publishing the content or alluding

> to what it was about.

>

> If you're prepared to post on a public forum, and

> be quite antagonistic with it, then you can

> reasonably expect to receive a response on the

> forum or by PM.

>

> I don't read the family room posts but from what

> I've seen of Londonmix on other parts of the forum

> comes across as a reasonable, fair and interesting

> poster whose contributions are worth reading.

> Increasingly rare qualities these days, in my

> opinion. LM has already politely explained their

> use of the word jerk and why they PMd rather than

> derailed the thread so no need to go on about

> other ridiculous things it could have meant. I'd

> be horrified if someone started a thread about a

> PM I'd sent. It's unnecessary and unpleasant

> behaviour.

>

> If you're being "cyber-bullied" or receiving

> offensive, abusive PMs then that's another matter

> entirely. Nothing to see here tho.

gillandjoe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ah yes, you must all stick together on this. Some

> self-reflection would be far too upsetting!

> In my original post, I was commenting on the type

> of language some people were using - you know -

> 'first world problems'. I wasn't criticising

> anyone needing advice or sharing tips!

> I certainly don't think that it justifies being

> called a 'jerk' in a private message. Would you

> have had the 'balls' to call me a jerk to my face,

> Londonmix? You should take your own advice.

> However, I would be happy to meet up in person and

> have it out with you if you'd like.


Oh god blimey, wipe your mouth of it all


And offering to meet someone to 'have it out' is idiotic


Being called a jerk in a pm is pretty polite given the above


I'm thinking something stronger here

I hear the latest grand theft auto is centered around a fictional East Dulwich. Where nothing really happens except people abuse each other with childish names in drive by shoutings and message boards. Then bleat about a tree being damaged for the rest of the game.

gillandjoe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Would you have had the 'balls' to call me a jerk to my face,

> Londonmix? You should take your own advice.

> However, I would be happy to meet up in person and

> have it out with you if you'd like.


If you do decide to have it out in person i would be happy to referee if you could make it a Friday morning as I'm turfed out of my flat by the cleaner #firstworldproblems

dogcatdog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hear the latest grand theft auto is centered

> around a fictional East Dulwich. Where nothing

> really happens except people abuse each other with

> childish names in drive by shoutings and message

> boards. Then bleat about a tree being damaged for

> the rest of the game.


drive by shoutings :)

I just sent myself a PM calling myself a gentrifier. I've reported myself to the mods, the police and the rockers.


gillandjoe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would you have had the 'balls' to call me a jerk to my face,

> Londonmix? I would be happy to meet up in person and

> have it out with you if you'd like.


lol


This is probably the least risky forum in the world to act like an internet tough guy and ask people if they "want some". What are you going to do, throw their latte over their labradoodle? "Jerk" sounds like an okay description.

Not as rich as a 'newbie' writing that. Unless of course you aren't. In which case who were you before?


Grok Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bit rich coming from die hard clique needy

>

> numbers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think it's really bad forum etiquette to start

> a

> > thread about a private message, naming the

> person

> > who sent it and publishing the content or

> alluding

> > to what it was about.

> >

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...