Jump to content

Recommended Posts

dogcatdog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> despite the jovial hirsute craft beer bonhomie and

> sizzling artisanal fare on offer around the

> station, people still get stabbed in Peckham.

>

> Can we not move these awful people somewhere else

> ? if someone could get a 38 degrees petition

> going, I would gladly sign up

>

> signed

>

> D Duck



This group do more than petition DD, you can join the campaign ;))


http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/24553/1/reclaim-brixton-one-neighbourhood-unites-against-developers

Stop bullying Foxy. Pathetic playground bully.


DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "The problem is that the element of those who

> > carry knives know that should they get caught

> with

> > them and arrested,

> > when it come to going to court they will receive

>

> > no more than a slap on the wrist and 80 hours

> > community service.

> >

> > There is no deterrent..

> >

> > Falter on your Council Tax and you get banged

> > up.."

> >

> > This is up to your usual level of utter nonsense

> -

> > well done.

>

>

> A man who armed himself with a 5" knife has been

> sentenced to 200 hours community service.

>

>

>

> You can be sent to prison for up to 3 months if

> the court decides you don?t have a good reason to

> not pay your Council Tax and you refuse to do so.

>

>

>

>

> Not Nonsense.. Dozens of such incidents up and

> down the country..

>

> DF"

>

> Let's see if we can spot the difference between a

> sweeping generalisation about what "the problem

> is" and a single anecdote plus a hypothetical.

> You're talking out of your rear, yet again.*

>

> There's a bill that will supposedly find its way

> to parliament in this session that has a two

> strikes provision i.e. two knife possession

> offences = automatic prison, 6 month minimum. The

> info supporting that suggested that in 2014 about

> 35% of knife possession offences = immediate

> custody. The stats usually lump together bladed

> article and offensive weapon convictions (penknife

> or flick knife, essentially). For the latter you

> are much more likely to go to prison, even first

> time. One of the criticisms of the bill is that

> it is likelihood of getting caught which is the

> deterrent, not the sentence, and there's a fair

> amount of research that backs that up.

>

> *with the smartening up of almost all the local

> boozers, the experience of being buttonholed at

> the bar by some ignorant old git and bored for

> hours by his tendentious drivel has almost

> disappeared, but it's clearly alive and well in

> the online saloon bar.

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Stop bullying Foxy. Pathetic playground bully."

>

> If someone keeps shitting in your street, do you

> just keep stepping over it or do you try and

> persuade him to stop?



I don't think giving factual information to counter somebody else's post can be considered "bullying".


However calling someone a "pathetic playground bully" might be....

Before anyone starts with the bullying rhetoric, I have no preformed opinion on Dulwich Fox but, I suspect through ignorance of the law, his post comparing the decision in a decided case to the contents of a government website warning someone of the maximum penalty is nonsense.


In the news article, the gentleman was convicted of possession of an offensive weapon probably on an agreed facts basis given the prosecutor's comments as regards the Defendant's reasons for carrying the knife and limited intention in doing so. Details of the maximum sentence which can be awarded on that crime can be found here: http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manual/knives_and_offensive_weapons/ If dealt with in the Mags Court then its a maximum sentence of 6 months' imprisonment plus fine but if handled on indictment into the Crown Court then it's up to 4 years plus fine.


So, whether dealt with in the Mags or the Crown Court the maximum sentence is more punitive than the maximum for non-payment of Council Tax.


The Defendant in the reported article looks to have made an early plea (reference to having pleaded guilty at an earlier hearing), there was probably a pre-sentencing report prepared and he was of previous good character which are all pretty good reasons why he shouldn't face the maximum and which, coupled with a relatively benevolent set of agreed facts, justify a non-custodial sentence.


If you're going to make a point about sentencing on knife crime on the back of a thread about an horrific local incident, you may as well get your references right.


As you were.



DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DaveR Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > "The problem is that the element of those who

> > carry knives know that should they get caught

> with

> > them and arrested,

> > when it come to going to court they will

> receive

> > no more than a slap on the wrist and 80 hours

> > community service.

> >

> > There is no deterrent..

> >

> > Falter on your Council Tax and you get banged

> > up.."

> >

> > This is up to your usual level of utter nonsense

> -

> > well done.

>

>

> A man who armed himself with a 5" knife has been

> sentenced to 200 hours community service.

>

> http://www.worcesternews.co.uk/news/3555995.Commu

> nity_service_for_knife_man/

>

> You can be sent to prison for up to 3 months if

> the court decides you don?t have a good reason to

> not pay your Council Tax and you refuse to do so.

>

> https://www.gov.uk/council-tax-arrears

>

> Not Nonsense.. Dozens of such incidents up and

> down the country..

>

> DF.

On topic, there was also reference above to limiting stop and search. This is currently the subject of a big row between the Home Sec and the Met Police:


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11946081/Theresa-May-says-police-knife-crime-claims-are-simply-not-true.html


The only fact about knife crime that appears clear and uncontroversial is that more carrying of knives leads to greater use of knives to injure/kill, so any strategy aimed at dissuading people from carrying knives in the first place is worth a go. Sentencing is already fairly tough, and stop and search is still fairly heavily used, so changing either of those can't be expected to have radical results. The boring truth is that education (in the broadest sense of the word) and challenging gang culture is what is going to change things (on this I agree with BlahBlah)

uncleglen wrote


Well, the only answer is to leave them alone to get on with their 'gang-banging'...I'm sure the poor bloke from Basildon would agree (if he was still with us. RIP)


The problem with that is it does not just stop among themselves it tends to filter over and some by standers gets stabbed if you happen to be there at the wrong time and place.

Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen wrote

>

> Well, the only answer is to leave them alone to

> get on with their 'gang-banging'...I'm sure the

> poor bloke from Basildon would agree (if he was

> still with us. RIP)

>

> The problem with that is it does not just stop

> among themselves it tends to filter over and some

> by standers gets stabbed if you happen to be there

> at the wrong time and place.



More caught in the gun crossfire I'd say (happened in New Cross didn't it)


Reading some reports from 2007 I'm certain it's quieter now. I don't feel

a bad vibe in Peckham at all - or am I just used to it ?

Its still there, but its rare to see it in the open, never mind be involved first hand in it.


http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/sep/06/two-teenagers-charged-with-over-stabbing-in-brockley-south-east-london


That's a kick in the arse from ED, up Norbert road way. Kid went to Kingsdale school. Its never gone away.Without getting all class war, many of the more recent residents of SE22 & SE15 would not know what it is like in some areas- they have little cause to have any interaction there

if you spend your time flitting between popup burger emoporia, your job in shoreditch, the commute on the ginger line the bussey building and your house on Bellend road like a hirsute social butterfly, then it is entirely possible not to realise this

dogcatdog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> if you spend your time flitting between popup

> burger emoporia, your job in shoreditch, the

> commute on the ginger line the bussey building and

> your house on Bellend road like a hirsute social

> butterfly, then it is entirely possible not to

> realise this


Peckham wetherspoons is my worst - did get asked if I wanted to do business once.

It's quite busy these days.


And in Camberwell a lad asked me for ?1 - gave him a ?1 - and then asked how many wraps.

The pound was some kind of code :) - I slinked off.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think we have lost all perspective - The BBC clearly misquoted Trump (which is obviously wrong), in a programme that broadly gave an accurate account of what happened on January 6th - that he inspired the attack on the Capitol. His speech did repeatedly call on people to fight. He repeatedly claimed that the election had been stolen. He has since pardoned many of those involved in that violence. The 'journalist' at the Telegraph who 'broke' this 'story', more than a year after the Panorama documentary aired, also misquoted Trump's speech and gave a false impression of what was actually said. In both the case of the BBC and the Telegraph, the editing was misleading and sloppy. In my opinion however, the editing of the speech by the Telegraph is actually more misleading than the BBC's. The jist of the speech was not one calling for calm, but one calling for supporters to fight: "...fight like hell and if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore". Trump used the term "fight" twenty times, and the term "peacefully" just once. During Trump's speech, his supporters chanted "Take the Capitol", "Invade the Capitol", "Storm the Capitol" and "Fight for Trump". The Telegraph have not acknowledged their misleading editing / misquote of course. Trump has escaped punishment for his role in a violent insurrection. Many of the rioters who stormed the Capital have been let off / pardoned. The only people to have taken responsibility for anything, or to have faced any consequences for their behaviour, are the BBC. The BBC have apologised and both the BBC Director General and the News CEO have lost their jobs. They (we) also face a 1 billion dollar law suit from a corrupt, criminal, President (an unprecedented act from the supposed 'defender of free speech / the free world'). The idea that the BBC's errors are being 'swept under the carpet' is self evidently nonsense. It is very clear that the Telegraph would love to end the BBC, as would the Times etc. They are not motivated by the national interest, or a quest for truth (neither is Trump - a firehose of BS). For Trump to be suing any media organisation as the sitting president of the United states, (let along a publicly owned UK broadcaster - effectively, the British taxpayer) is outrageous. That the whole country isn't telling him exactly where to go, shows a distinct lack of patriotism in my opinion. 
    • Trying to get to the bottom of the confusion. The events team email, the council website and the letter we all got through the door, says the consultations are this evening. I went along yesterday because it looks as though word of mouth had sent some people there on the wrong day (myself included). So not an error by the council on the date, but definitely a problem in letting people register their interest in attending. Hopefully that clears things up.
    • The ‘tree people’ conjures up a very Tolkienesque image.
    • I am hoping to find Furniture Risers, 4" or above. Needed to raise a bed and a sofa.  If you have any that you no longer need / wish to sell, please contact me by PM. Thank you  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...