Jump to content

Recommended Posts

September!!! Oh really thats not on!! I was looking forward to taking my girls swimming there.


I would propose that to compensate us for the much delayed opening ..that Dulwich Leisure Centre offers some sort of incentvie, ie like specially reduced entry for the first couple of months opening.

  • 3 weeks later...

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi ian164SE22 & Weegee,

> That is weird.

> I've contacted the head officer responsible

> highlighting this conflicting information and

> await a reponse.


Hi James


Thanks for doing that.


Let us know what the Head Officer says.


The mystery deepens!!! :)

I owe an apology.


The letter I received last Friday stated the reopening as delayed until September. I thought I'd read it but as it appeared identical repeat of letter sent earlier stating August I didn't notice small paragrah in the 4 page letter tucked away stating:


"The dulwich Phase 1 construction site suffered a break-in in early June 2010. Although very little was stolen, siginificant damage was done to the internal wiring of the new entrance building. The work to repair this damage commenced immediately, however we now expect phase 1 area to open in spetember 2010."

Cllr Barber presided over a significant delay in the baths refurbishment, a portion of the delay was only revealed to him via a receptionist's comments in this thread!!


But now he has no responsibility he is making political points over it, which I can't bee bothered with I just want to go swimming. He has obviously been reading his Effective Opposition Lib Dem handbook (http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2009/feb/03/lib-dems-elections).


Now, when exactly are these baths reopening??

Hi Candp,

How have I made a political point?

When the suggestion of September opening came up I said I thought it was still August said as far as I was aware still August but that I would check.

I checked with officers and found I was wrong and apologised and gave the reason for the one month delay.

If I was spinning I would have said I was shocked at the extra months delay and not given the reason ro apologise for getting it wrong. To slur me in these circumstances is at best unkind.

Let me find an example, right, you made a political point here: "Seems to have slipped by a month since the May elections. Releived (sic) that project so far progressed that this flagship Lib Dem project will be finished."


Then when it is observed you have made a political point you stand back and say "Moi? Political? I just want to serve the community", as is exquisitely demonstrated in the post above. Whilst I admire your presence on the EDF and you undertaking casework here, let's not pretend that you aren't out to get votes and to occasionally - shock horror - undermine your opponents.


I do like the implication in your "at best unkind" comment, you are subtle but good in your innuendos. Be assured that if I had been unkind you'd have known about it.


Now back to the pool, September it is. I'll be pleased when I finally get in there.

Hi candp,

But it did slip by a month from one side of the election to the next.

I don't know if this was officers suddenly being more direct. Change of political priorities.

But I was made a real point of asking on several occassions before the election becuase people were asking me. When I asked officers are the election it had changed.

The way I stated it was probably unhelpful but you can only guess at the frustration.


Anyway, thanks for the kind words about my casework via the forum.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I owe an apology.

>

> The letter I received last Friday stated the

> reopening as delayed until September. I thought

> I'd read it but as it appeared identical repeat of

> letter sent earlier stating August I didn't notice

> small paragrah in the 4 page letter tucked away

> stating:

>

> "The dulwich Phase 1 construction site suffered a

> break-in in early June 2010. Although very little

> was stolen, siginificant damage was done to the

> internal wiring of the new entrance building. The

> work to repair this damage commenced immediately,

> however we now expect phase 1 area to open in

> spetember 2010."



Hi James


Thanks for letting us know and apology accepted!


And contrary to what Candp was saying...i dont think you were making a political point.



You were as always being prompt and helpful to all our questions on this issue.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • V interesting ArchieCarlos.   The UK is #1 at blocking and delaying investment (per the article I linked to above).  This means we have pretty much the lowest gross fixed capital formation in the developed world and the economic results are there for all to see (this led to the nihilistic political environment that enabled Brexit which made things even worse). Some of this blocking and delaying is well intentioned and aimed at a better outcome but much of it a smokescreen to prevent any investment at all and is a money-spinner for consultants and lawyers. According to the FT the new Kent tunnel has cost £1.2bn so far even before construction starts of which £800m has been on consultants, planning and legal fees.  359,080 pages of documentation!  This does not compare favourably with much more complex tunneling projects in countries like Norway or Germany.
    • Hello We've been let down by our surveyor who didn't look at the loft as they said their ladder wasn't tall enough - we're about to exchange but are keen to check the loft/roof before! Does anyone near to Melbourne Grove have a tall ladder we could borrow for an hour tomorrow around 3?   Thanks so much!
    • Trump is driving a wedge between the UK and EU. 
    • I am delighted to hear the development was approved.  In my opinion, the UK is building far too little housing. And unless we build on green belts, the only solution is to increase the density of our cities, which is exactly what this scheme achieves.  Where I'm from (France), planning is generally looser and in my home city it's common to see single dwellings being razed to make way for a 5-6 story block of flats, even in city centres. Does it change the character of the local area? For sure! But I don't see another way to provide the supply to meet demand and provide ample supply of housing for a growing population. My personal experience is that in the UK, there is a lot more time spent on consultations, on achieving a perfect outcome for everyone. This results in generally better and more harmonious building than in France, but it makes things slower and more costly, with the need to coordinate many consultants.  It's interesting to compare France and the UK as they have similar populations and population growth, with an economy centred on a huge capital city. When you look at the number of houses/flats built in France and the UK over the past 10 years, the result is pretty striking. # France UK Difference 2023 298,100 150,370 -147,730 2022 392,100 182,070 -210,030 2021 410,000 177,160 -232,840 2020 368,800 129,440 -239,360 2019 387,700 153,000 -234,700 2018 401,200 168,610 -232,590 2017 434,700 164,110 -270,590 2016 370,000 155,150 -214,850 2015 341,000 148,150 -192,850 2014 336,900 140,760 -196,140 2013 357,900 124,790 -233,110 2012 382,300 101,020 -281,280 Total 4,480,700 1,794,630 -2,686,070 Average 373,392 149,553 -223,839 When HS1 was built, the French engineers (it was built with the French high-speed signalling) were surprised at how Brits wanted to "gold-plate" everything. The UK arguably has the best, most effective, more reliable, more well-equipped high-speed line in the world, but we've only got 68 miles of it and it cost 2.5 times what it cost the French to build a line extension at the same time.  In my view, there's no magic wand: just deciding who will be the losers. In France, people in established neighbourhoods my lose out as they see them change dramatically, while the new entrants benefit from a much higher supply of housing (and thus cheaper housing). In the UK, we give greater priority to preserving the lifestyle and amenity of the established dwellers over the new entrants who lose out as the supply is choked and prices are higher. A final point of comparison would be the price per square foot of property in Greater Paris is £467 while in Greater London it's £667 - 30% cheaper!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...