Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am confused about the reasons for the change - apart from spite on Mr J's part.

One of the arguments against bendies is that fare dodging was easy because you get on at any dooor (conversley the fast load time is a benefit).

But on the non bendy 521s you still can use any door. So what has changed.


Then to claim the new buses are more green is fatuous if you throwing away bendies to use them. What is happening to the discarded BBs

I wish Boris would bring back routemasters, hop on hop off is so much easier than bendy busses and less dangerous for cyclists, with the oyster scheme there should be less dodging of fares, i live on barry Road and the bendy busses are so noisy and squeaky and further more the route master is an icon for london. I heard there is a new very efficient version that has been designed and will hopefully brought in to replace the dreaded BB on some routes. lets hope they start bringing it in on the 12 route. I would use it alot!!Any thoughts on this?

Here's a link about the new Routemaster I posted in the general discussion area a couple days back, I'm sure I have seen a more up to date one showing a front door for wheel chair access somewhere but haven't found it as yet.


New Routemaster


As I was saying in my post in the other section, I heard that the old Routemasters cost TFL a lot in payouts to people injuring themselves getting on and off the back at places other than bus stops, so that may lead to the new Routemasters having doors at the back.


Will be nice to see the new versions out on the road, but at ?200,000 each, they seem a bit pricey.


Edit: Just been reading his article, looks like we'll all end up paying extra for Boris's new toys.

Boris's future rides on a new bus

iaineasy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wish Boris would bring back routemasters, hop on

> hop off is so much easier than bendy busses


Having nearly killed someone jumping off an RM between stops I beg to differ.

Of course it would be his bl**dy fault if I had run him over but I would rather not have to live with the feeling of being involved in a serious accident.


(I maybe slightly embelishing the story. It was some time ago but I did have to swerve to avoid him).

Eradicating of the bendy bus seems daft, wasteful and expensive - it does seem that Boris is pursuing a personal grudge. Surely if they're not working out, just don't order any more of them.


Regarding the "green" issue, I'm sure the bendy buses will be sold and re-used elsewhere, but it still seems like a waste of London's resources.

I have no inclination to defend Mayor Boris but my understanding is that the bendy buses are leased on a fixed term contract and BJ has decided not to renew that contract. So they're not being scrapped as such. I agree it seems to be a point of principle for BJ which is not entirely backed up by evidence.

Bendy?s are bad. They are too long for London streets. They cause untold congestion when blocking junctions. They are expensive on the maintenance side (like catching fire too). They well known as the "free bus" - not sure the new ones will help in that regard. TfL are currently running at a significant loss. I can well believe it, passing tens and tens (on my bike) of more or less empty buses queuing up along Brixton Rd, Fulham Palace Rd to name a couple.

I do think the public in this country do have the power to influence the decision makers - if they care enough to get organised. Bus Conductors are major case in point - they are sorely missed by many. Employment opportunity or what? Nag your councillors, MPs etc. Would you pay a little more if it led to conductors returning to the buses?

People want routemasters because they remind them of times gone by. I too loved them, and being able to run for one and jump on as it pulled away was very useful for those of us who are usually late in the morning.


However, the new ones will not be the same, it'll be like a modern Beatle, or mini, just not right!

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...

star13uk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bendy?s are bad. They are too long for London

> streets. They cause untold congestion when

> blocking junctions. They are expensive on the

> maintenance side (like catching fire too).


It will take at least 2 double deckers to replace one bendy, so that is even longer !! and blocking junctions is entirely the drivers fault. The catching fire thing has only been true in London, although these buses are used around the world. Around 4 years ago I have witnessed a slightly mad rasta man lighting a series of matches and throwing them around inside the nr 436 bendy bus. I wonder if it was him to set fire to all those buses..

star13uk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bendy?s are bad. They are too long for London

> streets. They cause untold congestion when

> blocking junctions. They are expensive on the

> maintenance side (like catching fire too).


It will take at least 2 double deckers to replace one bendy, so that is even longer !! and blocking junctions is entirely the drivers fault. The catching fire thing has only been true in London, although these buses are used around the world. Around 4 years ago I have witnessed a slightly mad rasta man lighting a series of matches and throwing them around inside the nr 436 bendy bus. I wonder if it was him to set fire to all those buses..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...