Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I figure that living in a depressing or non-depressing neighbourhood does actually have medical effects.


Unfortunately what is no doubt of benefit to NHS costs is of no value to council budgets. Our systems are not (yet?) that joined-up.


But it is clear that making a budgetary decision isn't unreasonable, but hiding it in some sort of 'it's for your own good' policy is disingenuous. On another thread I have suggested lower profile trees/ shrubs that would cause less root damage and occupy less pavement space than the (albeit glorious) London Planes. (And it was a more modest tree which would be replaced here anyway). One issue raised (not unreasonably) by Mr Barber on his thread is that trees would require tending - and keeping a tree small and in control would take more than is normally allocated to tree maintenance. However, I would have thought that it is not beyond the bounds of possibility for street residents to 'adopt' trees and care for them outwith the tender (??) mercies of the council. The trees do after all add to their environmental benefit. Rowans and silver birches are reasonably shallow rooted and take a long time for their trunks to achieve any girth. Birches are slightly drought sensitive (being shallow rooted), but recently drought does not seem to have been a problem, locally.


Since the council doesn't really care that much, maybe it's time for some guerrilla gardening?

Perhaps if Cleaner Greener Safer money wasn't being used to fund the Melbourne Grove barrier study there would more left over for things like trees that actually are green!


I wonder if any other London Boroughs have run out of money for trees?

All good points, Penguin68, but I'd be perhaps more optimistic about this:


>>I figure that living in a depressing or non-depressing neighbourhood does actually have medical effects.

>

>Unfortunately what is no doubt of benefit to NHS costs is of no value to council budgets. Our systems are not

>(yet?) that joined-up.


There is more and more hard evidence for the health and well-being benefits of 'greenery' and space in the urban environment and I know that Cllr Hargrove of Southwark's Park and Open Sapces is keen to explore local environmental ideas that promote health and well-being. Perhaps before long 'promoting health and well-being' will be a box that needs ticking in other areas of the council's activities too.

It seems that the new size for tree pits is something of a one-off on the part of Southwark, if my conversations with tree personnel at the council are correct. Most other councils do not adopt this policy, I believe.

More info on why the new rules are being adopted are needed.

There's some rather interesting stuff on the Mayor's website about trees!


https://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/environment/greening-london/re-leaf


I'd be interested to know how many of the 20,000 London street trees Southwark benefitted from.


Even without grants etc, the Forestry Commission Standard Costs for London suggest it would only cost the council ?373.00 to plant a ?standard? tree. Not much when you consider the price of some of the tarmac and granite that's been installed recently.

Hi Kit... have been to buried to type, but I'm really pleased that you have created this petition and I will try to help when I get a bit more free time.


Can you do me two favours?


1. Can you post the direct url for the petition... it looks like the one you posted is diverted via Facebook somehow and it would be better to circulate a shorter url.


2. Can you give me the nearest house number to the treepit on Dunstans road, so that I can swing by and have a look?


I'm working out a cunning plan, more soon when I can type!

Hi Robin,


Sorry about the link! Is this any better? https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/preserve-southwark-s-street-trees


The house number I'm not sure about, but it is (or was) the only tree on the block, so if you're standing across from Balchier Road you can't miss it. It's been cropped down to a stump at this point.

catma Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have the same situation re a tree in my street -

> it was diseased so had to go but it was a lovely

> tree and with the new rules they won't replace.

> Although bins can be left all over the pavement,

> reducing the width with impunity it seems.


Ask the Lib Dems to take it up - they will back anything that will bag them votes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...