Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"BBW, shut up. That was a horrible post.

---------------------------------------

hear hear!!


BBW funny but wrong."


No Iain. As usual Moos was right to tell me off. It was a slipshod post and she was right to pull me up on it. Annaj and RosieH usually take over if Moos isn't keeping an eye on me.


I'll probably do it again though.

"Still waiting here people, how quick people are to criticise but i see noone with the courage of their convictions to think they can do better."


Do me a favour and put a sock in it will you Mockney. I couldn't care less about the drawing room for the simple reason being that it's boring and no fun at all, for me that is. I'm sticking to the lounge.

No Iain. As usual Moos was right to tell me off. It was a slipshod post and she was right to pull me up on it. Annaj and RosieH usually take over if Moos isn't keeping an eye on me.

-------------------------------------------



I have no doubt about that BBW. Still, glad to see you can take it on the chin when your being an A%$?hole and people tell you! Believe it or not I think that's worth a little respect.

:)-D

And what?s all this guff about the Chair being inconsistent or whatever. The Chair is just that, an individual overseeing and sometimes facilitating proceedings to their own standards. There are not a policeman with a tick box law-sheet.


What the fuck do people expect, a set of KPIs perhaps?


Just fucking deal and get on with it.


In fact I may just volunteer and start moving people?s post around and editing them inappropriately as punishment for whingeing.

I have less than no interest in BBW's moral worth or standards, and am extremely irritated to be characterised as some kind of aunty figure who keeps an eye on him. It is also incorrect to imply that a smirky Sorry Miss with a smug wink and a hey, I'm just a bad boy will make it OK. I will not be ignored, and I will not be patronised.


My interest is purely in keeping the forum a place where unpleasant racist and pornographic posts are considered unacceptable. Not because of political correctness or prudery, but in order to retain this forum as a place where everyone feels welcome and comfortable.


BBW, please edit your posts or I will report them and have them removed.

"BBW, please edit your posts or I will report them and have them removed."


Be my guest Moos. You may find this shocking to take in but on occasion I do take the trouble to edit some of my posts if I think that on the occasion I've gone too far.


You may find it irritating to be characterised as some sort of aunty figure but I'm afraid some of the blame for this label must be apportioned to yourself. By attempting to hush me or slap me down by bringing my youth into question such as "quiet/hush little pup", will undeniably brand you as some sort of matron figure.


That's all.

You misunderstand me, although I suppose I shouldn't be surprised.


I have no issue with my being older than you, but more that your post in response to my first today on this thread implied some kind of watching-over of your behaviour. I do not do that.


If you consider your post re: TLS to have been acceptable, and not worthy of editing I can only say I find that a shame. I have reported it. I continue to be extremely annoyed that I've been made to feel that I had to, I hate doing it.

iaineasy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lets be clear here, the Drawing Room(DR) is for

> serious people who like to discuss serious issues,

> moderated seriously by a Chairperson..

>

> It is not a place for trivia, diversion and most

> certainly NOT mirth.

>

> In my opinion there's far too much "mirth" in

> life, generally, and most certainly on EDF at

> times.

>

> In life, as in the EDF, we need more discipline

> and that discipline should start on The Drawing

> Room.

>

> If some don't like the strict regime there then

> they should try living in The Taliban or sign up

> for National Service.

> --------------------------------------------------

> --------------------------------------------------

> ------------------

>

> Tony why are you so pissed off with the world?I

> get the feeling you haven't had sex for a while,

>

> Why can serious issues not be debated with mirth?

>

>

> If we dont like the drawing room we should sign up

> for national service or move to afghanistan?

>

> I find the following statement from you a bit

> sad:

>

> In my opinion there's far too much "mirth" in

> life, generally, and most certainly on EDF at

> times.

>

> A laugh a day keeps the doctor away

> Tony................. seriously.

> >:D<


I'm about to board the 12.38 train to London to spend the day with a slim, beautiful, 5' 11'' tall Lady who is a mere 30 years of age.


I think you can assume that my post from the 1st letter to the final full stop was,er, in "mirth"...:)-D

"I have no issue with my being older than you, but more that your post in response to my first today on this thread implied some kind of watching-over of your behaviour. I do not do that."


I never said I feel you have an issue in being older than me, it just get's a little tiring having my age and inexperience of the world being brought into question now and again. A tool you sometimes use against me although you're not the only one who does it.


I'm sorry if you feel that I see you as someone who is watching over me but you're one of those who often make their feelings known to me by indicating their displeasure of my behaviour. I'm sure that you can see why I feel that you're watching over me (and others) by making your feelings so clear and your follow up of reporting the post that has caused you displeasure.


"If you consider your post re: TLS to have been acceptable, and not worthy of editing I can only say I find that a shame. I have reported it. I continue to be extremely annoyed that I've been made to feel that I had to, I hate doing it."


You're entitled to your opinion but don't imply that I'm solely responsible in somehow forcing your hand in doing something you dislike. The choice is entirely yours although I sympathise with your reasons for doing so on occasion as I know that I can go too far but I'm not the only one.

I'm about to board the 12.38 train to London to spend the day with a slim, beautiful, 5' 11'' tall Lady who is a mere 30 years of age.


I think you can assume that my post from the 1st letter to the final full stop was,er, in "mirth"...smileys with beer.


-------------------------------------------------------------


well if she's not your daughter,Good luck to you sir, have one for me!!

"Do me a favour and put a sock in it will you Mockney."


as the forum's premier poster of irrelevence and inappropriacy (is that even a word?) I'm not sure you've earned the right to shut me up about it in a thread entitled 'drawing room yay or nay', not interestingly enough 'tony's dick' or even 'it's all about wolfie' though sometimes I wonder if that's the default aka of every thread in the lounge.

Although I found your statement regarding the strength of our convictions regarding someone popping their head above the parapet as a rather broad accusation of some sort of cowardice rather unnecessary as well as rude considering many of us (myself included) haven't made any criticism of the Chair or how s/he goes about moderating the Drawing room.

"I'm not sure you've earned the right to shut me up about it in a thread entitled 'drawing room yay or nay'."


Earned the right?


What, do I have to be privy to some sort of blessing or bestowal before I request that you pipe down or if I can voice an opinion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
    • Avoid any 2nd hand vehicle with the Ford petrol 1.0 Ecoboost engine and the Petrol 1.2 PureTech engine that can be found in Peugeot, Citroen, Vauxhall.... (you need to mention price for advice)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...