Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We are thinking of selling our large 1 bed flat for something bigger. Naturally this won?t be in East Dulwich anymore as it?s eaten itself but we?d like to stay south of the river as our jobs are here. I?m interested to know how on earth others got on the second rung of the ladder. I fear it?s going to be harder than being a first time buyer even though we have decent equity.


Side note, although we could move to a 2 bed flat, it seems like a bad use of funds: big stamp duty fee, gain an extra small bedroom but not much more overall square footage. So, like everyone else, we?re trying to jump to a pre-war house.


How did you do it?


Did you suddenly come into some money, e.g inheritance?

Did you save like crazy to plug the difference?

Take out a big mortgage and stretch yourself?

Compromise hugely on area and pray it changes?

Wait until you?re much older?


Any real life experiences, good or bad, would be gratefully read.

My second "rung" was a three bed maisonette (which needed a lot of hard work to make into a liveable home). The jump to a good size house was just much too far. I wouldn't rule out something similar if I were you.


As for how you manage it? Everyone is different but I guess a combination of appreciation, rising salary, saving, and willingness to take on fixer-uppers.

Luck. Partner and I both owned small flats that had risen significantly in value. We were able to sell them and buy a three-bed in East Dulwich that needed serious work. It didn't have central heating, a shower or a kitchen to speak of. Walls were falling down and carpets hadn't been changed since the 70s.


Two years on, we've just about finished major work internally.

Good luck played a big part for us too.


First flat was Nunhead side of Peckham rye, we bought it just after the price crash in 09. It was a very tired repo so we got it pretty cheap. Did it up over the next few years.


Sold up last year and bought a 3 bed house in Kenley near Purley. It's another do-er upper, but has cost us about the same as a studio flat in E.D.

Luck for us too. First house in ED came about after we were gazumped on a much smaller flat. Property market went crazy about the time we were looking to upsize, and the house we ended up buying was a "must sell today". That particular day there was a really important England football match on, and lots of the people booked to look though cancelled their viewings.
We bought a house that needed a lot of work. Over quite a few years we did it up and eventually extended. Initially we did take on a big mortgage, but as our salaries rose and over time it ended up being a worthwhile risk. We did also get some help from my parents without which we would have really struggled. Primarilly though we were lucky to buy at a time when the market wasn't quite as mad. Property prices now are a bad joke.

I can't get on the second rung - I need about 300k to upgrade a 1 bed ED flat to a 3 bed ugly modern-ish maisonette. This is beyond what I can mortgage on my salary.


A 2 bed flat with service charge doesn't really seem much of a step up to warrant bigging up the mortgage.

Thank you all for those replies.

We may have to lower our expectations (even though I would give my right arm not to be in a flat anymore).I do appreciate though, that we are one of the lucky few to be even on the ladder at all.

Or take out a bigger mortgage but that feels wrong somehow. The gap is ridiculous. Even run down houses in SE are over half a million.

I don't know how anyone does it now, even with equity, unless they have over 100k capital lying around.

"Did you save like crazy to plug the difference?

Take out a big mortgage and stretch yourself?

Compromise hugely on area and pray it changes?"


The simple truth is that these days you probably need to do all of the above (and most people always needed to, just not to the same extent as now). There's a link below to three bed houses with gardens in S London with asking price< ?400k (Rightmove's definition of S London is quite expansive)


http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/find.html?locationIdentifier=REGION%5E92051&maxPrice=400000&minBedrooms=3&displayPropertyType=houses&oldDisplayPropertyType=houses&propFeature=Garden&sortType=1&numberOfPropertiesPerPage=10


Looking at the map view is quite revealing about where is affordable (obviously relative)


I'd agree entirely with you about trying to step up to a house if you can stretch to it. And if you're willing to compromise on the 'pre war' you will have more choice.

I think anyone joining the property ladder post 2000 is pretty doomed unless they have the kind of job that is transferable to another part of the country. We bought in 1997, with parental help (on both sides) and were able to get a three bedroomed property, large enough for our family. We couldn't do it now.


Part of problem is the desperation for first time buyers to buy anything, just to get a foothold. Even fix-me-uppers are overpriced now. I think the consensus is to look further out.


Useful calculator from the Guardian here. Shows just how ridiculous the situtaion has become.


http://www.theguardian.com/society/ng-interactive/2015/sep/02/unaffordable-country-where-can-you-afford-to-buy-a-house

Options 1-3 and a little bit of 4 (a small-moderate compromise)

#2 was thanks to our base rate tracker, which allowed as to have very very low mortgage repayments for over 5y

#5 depends on what you mean by "much older"




cantthinkofaname Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We are thinking of selling our large 1 bed flat

> for something bigger. Naturally this won?t be in

> East Dulwich anymore as it?s eaten itself but we?d

> like to stay south of the river as our jobs are

> here. I?m interested to know how on earth others

> got on the second rung of the ladder. I fear it?s

> going to be harder than being a first time buyer

> even though we have decent equity.

>

> Side note, although we could move to a 2 bed flat,

> it seems like a bad use of funds: big stamp duty

> fee, gain an extra small bedroom but not much more

> overall square footage. So, like everyone else,

> we?re trying to jump to a pre-war house.

>

> How did you do it?

>

> Did you suddenly come into some money, e.g

> inheritance?

> Did you save like crazy to plug the difference?

> Take out a big mortgage and stretch yourself?

> Compromise hugely on area and pray it changes?

> Wait until you?re much older?

>

> Any real life experiences, good or bad, would be

> gratefully read.

many are benefitting from the results of the equity they gained when they purchased their first place in the 90s/ 2000's. Other are starting to inherit as their parents pass on & cash in the equity. Despite what we read in the papers, very few are able to arrange a mortgage on 2 bedder in ED from scratch based only on their income these days.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for clarifying, James. So why would anybody want to take this on as a franchise if it is staying in this building? If it is now to be a sub office, does that mean that much of  the space could be used as a different kind of business altogether, with just part of it being used as a sub Post Office? Because if it is all to remain solely for Post Office business, (albeit as a sub Post Office it won't be providing all the services which it currently does) I can't see who would want to take it over? If it isn't profitable as a Crown office, how could it be  profitable running just as a sub office, even if staff are being paid less and it's opening for longer hours? Because presumably all the other overheads such as rent will remain the same?
    • Girobank was genuinely innovative, regarding the addressed customer base (significantly the previously unbanked) - but this would have been an ideally outsourced operation to an existing bank which already had the operational systems (and the regulatory experts) to manage a bank for someone else at marginal cost. The Post Office - when you consider the issues over the Horizon software - never originally designed by ICL/ Fujitsu for the application it ran - is a very good reason why the Post Office being involved in banking was long-term a bad idea.  To get back to the topic of this thread, the Horizon debacle is still not over (the software system is still in place) - most of the wrongly penalised sub-postmasters are still out of pocket - I'm not sure I would be leaping to take on the franchise being offered in Lordship Lane.
    • Otherwise in Bellenden Road are brilliant! They’ve made me stage dresses, restructured vintage finds and are working on remodelling my late brothers huntsman tweed suit for my modern husband! Not cheap and rents have meant they are moving premises at mo.
    • Penguin, I broadly agree, except that the Girobank was a genuinely innovative and successful operation. It’s rather ironic that after all these years we are now back to banking at the Post Office due to all the bank branch closures.  I agree that the roots of the problem go back further than 2012 (?), when the PO and RM were separated so RM could be sold. I’m willing to blame Peter Mandelson, Margaret Thatcher or even Keith Joseph. But none of them will be standing for the local council, hoping to make capital out of the possible closure of Lordship Lane PO, as if they are in no way responsible. The Lib Dems can’t be let off the hook that easily.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...