Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Delia Smith (who cooks with an aga, has 2 foreign hols a year, flies to every norwich away match and drives a jaguar) complains that it is difficult to cut your personal emissions as there is very little information available about the alternatives. I suspect that everyone on this forum would find it very easy to reduce their energy consumption by 10%. Have a look on the Guardian website for details!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-244115
Share on other sites

I don't need to because I'm not the one who's poisoning the world, its everyone else...

Sorry, couldn't resist.


I got an email from EON yesterday about it. I can look at my 'Energy Tracker' online apparently. I put new draught excluders in and started turning off unnecessary lights last year and it appears to have made quite a difference (don't have to pay ?289 per month anymore).


Certainly will do it as it will save me money as well as 'doing my bit'

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-244116
Share on other sites

I've just taken up RoosterMcLooster's suggestion above and looked at the Guardian website. I clicked on two articles and after scanning about 2,000 words on the subject I'm no clearer what I'm supposed to do to reduce my carbon footprint in a meaningful way.


Can anybody point me in the right direction so I can view a serious scientific list of the power used by everyday machines and labour saving devices. For example, if I am one of 300 people who fly on a plane to Italy and back for my holidays, hire a car and tour 1,000 miles what is the carbon breakdown of my actions as opposed to actions I take every day?


As I write this my washing machine is on, my dishwasher is on, my laptop is plugged in, my mobile phone is being charged, the light in the room is on, I've boiled the electric kettle to make a drink, taken milk from the fridge, taken some food out of the freezer to defrost overnight for tomorrow's dinner which I shall cook in an oven and newsnight is on telly. My wife is in the other room watching a different telly and my son is up stairs on another plugged in laptop with the telly also on. I'm sure this is not an unusual state of affairs in countless households up and down the country at this very moment.


If I washed up the dishes by hand I've no doubt that would help but I'm not going to start washing clothes by hand like my grandmothers used to do. I could switch off my telly as there's two others being used at the moment. I could switch off my computer. My son won't be very pleased if I ask him to do the same to reduce his carbon footprint.


The point I'm trying to make is we've reached (in the affluent first world at least) a standard of living with all sorts of gadgets and white/brown goods that will not go away. Furthermore, many of the recommendations to reduce carbon emissions are expensive, eg, lagging attics, and people won't spend the money without financial incentives. If people turn down the central heating by one degree it will help I admit but does charging a mobile phone/using a computer cancel out the gain?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-244426
Share on other sites

Dishwashers apparently save energy: they only use the right amount of water and so if you fill up the dishwasher each time before use, even taking into account the energy used, you'll save something, money or energy, water definitely. However, no room in our flat for a dishwasher and we couldn't afford one anyway.

Washing machines probably the same theory - better than washing each and every item separately.

I remember reading that if you go in to a room which has say a strip light and turn it on each time you go in, during a day, you would save energy by keeping it on because the energy it uses being turned on each time is more than if you had left it on. But that may be bollo&s.

Do Macs use energy more efficiently than PCs? Then the world should demand the desctruction of all PCs!

I have a brick in the toilet cistern so it uses less water when flushing; can't afford a new modern cistern.

Doing me best but sometimes I look out at the view of London and all the lights especially in the taller buildings, and think - I can't do this all alone, corporate social responsibility and all that. Piccadilly at night anyone? Pahhh

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-244482
Share on other sites

I do not think the campaign is aimed at taking people back to the dark ages, just being a bit more sensible.


Mind you, after agreat holiday to Bulgaria this year (first time we have flown as a family) I did suggest that we drive there next year. Didn't go down very well as its a 3500 mile round trip in the car!


Switching off unnecessary lights or other appliances, fitting draught excluders, not wasting food etc are whats recommended.


10:10

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-244527
Share on other sites

A propos of silverfox's post - an important one - try reading Sustainable Energy without the Hot Air by Prof David McKay. It's a lightly written (though lots of figures) down to earth assessment of what really matters and what is practicable in teh way of alternative energy and savings, rather than the emotional statements and responses we too often get. Too many "facts" are trotted out in teh papers and on air which are unsubstantiated at best, and often based on different assumptions.


I wasn't there to sign up last week, but I've dusted my bike down, turn off more lights and put machines off inseat of on standby when we're out and at night. We have also installed solar water heating (not cheap but there are grants) which at this time of year is very effective.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-245336
Share on other sites

Thanks Sue I'll give Prof McKay a go. There does seem to be a lot of hot air around regarding climate change and carbon emissions.


I am still mystified what these companies do that trade carbon emissions on behalf of big industry. Perhaps I'm naive but accepting ?x million from the likes of Mr Murdoch so that so many hectares of land can be planted with trees to offset NewsCorp's carbon footprint seems a waste of time while the Amazon and several African jungles are being decimated.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-245357
Share on other sites

Deforrestation of the Amazon, whilst still at too high a rate has been brought down significantly when comparing the number of destroyed hectares from this year and last year. The surrounding coutnries have formed an alliance to increase and improve patrolling and policing of the area.


One of the easiest things that you can do as an energy consumer is to look at what form of power station your energy provider relies on. Some offer certain %'s of energy from renewable sources. In supporting these more ethically minded companies you will also be helping them to fund research into newer and more efficient technologies. Realistically people do not want to have to change their current lifestyle to reduce emissions as they do not see a direct knock-on affect to themselves as an individual. However, regardless of the climate change issue we do need to switch to more renewable or alternative energy sources as we hit peak oil several years ago, we already import over 10% of our annual gas requirements and within the next 50 year they estimate that this will increase to 90%. Which also then puts us in the grip of those who supply the gas.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-245632
Share on other sites

I suppose I should go to this and keep and open mind. However a cursory look at the urbangreenfair.org website shows pictures of lots bicycles to illustrate the sustainable transport zone, talks of solar cooking demonstrations amid pictures of lovely bread and talk of a farmer's market, the products of which I doubt will have been cooked by or cookable by such a method and also promotes the solar cinema which will show five or six films presumably not powered by solar energy.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-245908
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

At the slight risk of a shoeing... I can't help thinking it matters not. Whatever we do will make no difference at all. Convince China, India, Brazil etc are looking out on missing the great Western lifestyle and I might change my mind. Anybody remember the "Club of Rome" from the sixties I think? Or Jerry Pournelles "A Step Further Out" ? Our future of remaining on this island earth is a very limited one - population growth, pollution, lack of renewable resources, etc....

There are answers to all these issues but until the problem gets serious enough, nothing will be done about it in any meaningful way. Governments acting globally are the only way we may solve most of the big issues - but until becomes critical they only care about the short term and their re-election prospects.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-250337
Share on other sites

In the last year I have installed an efficient combi-condensing boiler (replacing a clapped out one), renovated over a dozen big window frames to remove gaps etc., and installed draught-proofing throughout, among other things. These are all things everyone can do. What with changing all bulbs, and switching off everything I don't need to have on, I think I've achieved around 30% energy use reduction around the house. I also installed a water meter, which has cut my water and sewerage bills by more than 50%.


Some friends have just incorporated a heat pump system, but that's only really feasible for new build (which theirs is).


Many of the carbon footprint calculators online do not seem to include many of life's activities. e.g. shopping for stuff (and all the energy embodied in all that stuff).

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-251773
Share on other sites

star13uk - I can't quite make up my mind as to whether you're using that as an excuse not to do anything, or just venting.


If you were using it as a lame excuse to do nothing, then you would deserve a shoeing - althoug it would be a bit counter-prductive as you can't kick someone out of apathy, you can only dig them a grave.


If you're just venting then I'd observe that it might feel good, but it's not really very helpful - just like telling your partner you've cheated on them: it may feel like you're assuaging your guilt but really you're just selfishly upsetting people, and if you really cared you'd be better off doing something about it in silence.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-251820
Share on other sites

Hi RoosterMcLooster,

You asked who's signed up.

I have and have had an energy audit of my home and gradually implimenting the recommendations.

Southwark Council have signed up corporately.

Now seeing if we can sign up for 11:11 and go a big step further.


Reducing CO2 the first 10% is easy. It then gets harder and harder BUT to avoid climate catastrophe we need to reduce CO" emissions by 80% by 2050. Living in London which will mostly be submerged if sea levels do rise by 11m we all have strong selfish motives to get our acts together.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-252769
Share on other sites

JBARBER Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> to avoid climate catastrophe we need to reduce

> CO[2] emissions by 80% by 2050. Living in London

> which will mostly be submerged if sea levels do

> rise by 11m we all have strong selfish motives

> to get our acts together.


1. What do you say to scientists who argue that atmospheric CO2 heats up the planet cumulatively during its relatively long lifetime and that therefore nothing we do now can avert an inevitable catastrophe in the future?


2. How is an 80% reduction to be achieved without venting as much waste heat into the atmosphere from the alternative energy sources as that which the eliminated fossil fuels would have generated in the first place? Or are you suggesting that London should revert to a pre-industrial era city by 2050?


3. An 11m rise in sea level within the lifetime of anyone on this forum would herald an extinction-scale catastrophe (i.e. runaway warming via an as yet unquantified, positive feedback mechanism). Is this the official LibDem position?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-252799
Share on other sites

"How is an 80% reduction to be achieved without venting as much waste heat into the atmosphere from the alternative energy sources as that which the eliminated fossil fuels would have generated in the first place?"


That's one I've never heard before. Who's got the data on that one?


Fossil fuels introduce energy stored in one form (chemical energy) into a system otherwise at a dynamic equilibrium - the climate. It does this through both the release of it's own stored resources, and the increased atmospheric retention of energy from secondary sources (sunlight) through chemical insulation (CO2). The impact of the latter significantly outweighs the former.


Renewables such as wind and wave recirculate energy already in the climate system, producing no net change there, and do not contribute to increased atmospheric energy retention through insulation.


If there's data that suggests otherwise I'd be happy to consider it!


On the 11m issue, I'm glad to see that the Lib Dems care not only for ourselves, but our children etc. ;-)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-252804
Share on other sites

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If there's data that suggests otherwise I'd be

> happy to consider it!


You are right about the impact of renewable energy sources. However, warming caused by CO2 accumulation is not the only theory around. The theory proposed in this paper, for example, claims a better fit to the data: Thermal pollution causes global warming

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7812-1010/#findComment-252985
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...