Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes, last year possibly October community police called to my home in SE5 and left two bottles of the stuff. I supplied my name and address on a form that was relevant to paint within bottle. Pity I didn't put a blob of it on the sat nav that was nicked from our car in Feb this year!

Same here- PCSO called and left me the kit. You sign a statement showing that it is unique to you


Now all my vauables are dabbed and a sticker on the front door declares as such to Billy Burglar


I have even put a smigeon behind each ear, in case i am kidnapped

Thanks for reminding me of that thread, Mark. That's brightened up my morning no end!


eater81 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SelectDNA? Does that mean that the property gets

> marked with your own DNA as a means of identifying

> you as its owner?

>

> If that is the case then it sounds more like a

> crafty attempt by the police to build up their

> sinister DNA database on the sly!

>

> SAY NO TO THE BIG BROTHER STATE!!!!

East dulwich councillors asked the local Police Safer Neighbourhood Team led by sgt Duncan Jackson what would their number one proprioty for crime prevention in East Dulwich. They said they were given 100 Smartwater property marking kits, on a good year, by the Met Police. They suggested they'd prefer SelectaDNA. So the Lib Dem East Dulwich cllrs responded by providing 1,000 SelectaDNA property marking kits.


We also suggested to the Police they deploy these properry marking kits to innoculate houses where burglary has taken place and their neighbours for 50m. Most burglaries are repeats around previous burglaries. They know the house layouts so more certainty what they'll meet.


I'm told all the kits have been deployed. 1,000 out of 5,200 homes in East Dulwich ward. Any burglar of an East Dulwich home has an 18% chance of stealing proprty that will get them or any fencer nicked.


We anticipate buying another 1,000 property marking kits this year.

If you'd like one for your home then let the local Police know [email protected]

As a follow up on this and the previous thread from January


I would like to clear something up

Firstly Smartwater and SelectaDNA are NOTthe same product


SelectaDNA uses a scientificaly desigend and manufactured DNA code unique to each kit ( over 1 billion possible combinations) these DNA codes CANNOT be confused with 'normal' or Human DNA as they are modified to stop this occuring.

Once purchased and registered to the database use is free.


Smartwater contains NO DNA it utilises a combination of chemicals to act as markers. The real downside about smartwater is that they have a reagistra=tion fee of over ?10 per year to keepyou on the database don't pay it your details are deleted and if the police find your gear they will not be able to repatriate it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...