Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi James,


Thanks for the reply. A couple of questions:


- How long had the existing entry treatment been in situ? As you can see from the first the other thread, it was in excellent condition (looked practically new).


- How much (ball park figure) do these things cost to implement?


- What was the intended lifespan when initially installed?


- How do we assess value for money when considering these building works?

Hi roadworrier,

From memory these entry treatments had been there a number of years. The planned changes should reduce the number of crashes at this junction and importantly make it feel safer as well. The cost of crashes is very high - so the payback for these changes will be prompt.


However, Southwark are the only UK to use specific blocks imported from Eire. That the supply is lagging. so they will need to temporarily use tarmac and then come back a couple of months later and finish the works with the intended materials. This is frustrating and adds expense. Also, I'm not sure why we can't have blocks from the UK, keep the cash and employment in the UK and reduce our carbon footprint. I will follow up on this.

Hello James

I am not sure if you can help but I thought I'd bring something to your attention. My family as well as other families in ED have been dealing with a lot of issues in our communication with the school admissions staff. In short they give contradictory and inaccurate information, say that they would call and never do and we also know for a fact that lists are not updated as quickly as it should making the whole process even more painful and frustrating than it needs to be.

Renata Hamvas is very helpful, I just thought that if they get some pressure from multiple sources they may actually sort things out quicker.

(I am happy to supply specific examples but perhaps over PM and not on the forum).

Thanks for listening, Peggy

  • 2 weeks later...

James, I trust you've seen this thread about Conway moving cars from East Dulwich Grove:

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1354789


They also put up a sign outside our house when replacing a drain cover and also had the wrong date on that. Luckily, we were away and weren't affected.


It seems to me that there's something rotten at the heart of Southwark Council's relationship with Conway - and it's the resdients who suffer. Is there any way examples of their incompetence and worse can be collated to make a serious challenge to their status as Sothwark's 'favourite' contractor? I live in hope more than expectation...

Hi James,


I'm sure you've seen a couple of threads discussing North Cross Road Market and 'where has it gone?'. A lot of people seem to have noticed it not as full as it could be, myself included, which is why when I phoned southwark council for an application pack to have a stall I was rather shocked when told it was full, only to wander down there last friday and there was only one stall. I think it should be looked into who has an allocated spot and isn't using it. It's not helping a really nice market to be half empty all the time when other people want to be there.


Thanks, Lisa

James today the Hadley Group who now own the DHFC stadium have announced their desire to redevelop the area. They have sent out a 'community newsletter' that has been delivered around the neighbourhood.


It states "as currently configured the facilities cannot continue to support the Club and a change in the layout and footprint of the buildings is needed. There is an opportunity to provide a new stadium and to invest in the open space located around the stadium."


Although not explicitely named there is a handy map on the other side highlighting just how much space there is behind the club on the Greendale Playing Fields.


They state that they have engaged architects Farrells to liease with Southwark Council. Has there been any change in the position of the council/councillors surrounding redevelopment and expansion of this site?

Hi milk76,

I'm not aware of any council change but usually such developers talk to council officials and councillors in the political group leading the council - Labour currently - to agree a way forward.

I'll make enquiries.


Hi lisaloulou84,

Would you be willing to run a stall on Fridays?

If so I'll find out why a potential stallholder wishing to use both days is being denied the opportunity.

James,

I would be willing to run a stall on both days. I sent 3 emails requesting application pack which were all ignored and when I eventually called I was told both days were full. I've noticed in recent weeks the market is getting smaller and smaller even on saturdays. I am in the process of purchasing a van, and its a new business with no commitments in other areas yet so would be willing to be there both Friday and Saturday every week, regardless of the weather!

PDF version of the Hadley Greendale "Newsletter" up on the Friends of DKH Wood website:


http://www.friendsofdkhwood.org/2014/07/plans-for-greendale/


Also a callout to anyone wanting to get involved in a "Friends of Greendale" group:

http://keepinggreendalegreen.tumblr.com/


Labour's stance in the past has always been "no encroachment on MOL" re the Greendale. Let's see what Hadley, Four COmmunications (the hired PR company) and Farrells come up with on the 19th.

Hi James,


Since you sit on a planning committee can you shed any light on why the latest planning report for the proposed M&S development appears to be greenlighting the submission, contradicting earlier reports which recommended refusal based on resident objections which were upheld? Why the apparent u-turn?

James,


In addition to First Mate's question:


We have met on Chesterfield Grove and discussed the M&S proposal. You said that you could see little reason why it could not take deliveries from Lordship Lane, just as Co-Op currently does. This would alleviate many of the problems associated with the planning application. As you have a seat on the planning committee, will you be pushing for this to be seriously considered?


Many thanks

Hi cl,

I'm not a member of Planning Sub-Committee B which will decide this application on Tuesday evening. But as per my objection to this application, request with my ward colleague Cllr Rosie Shimell to call this decision into a planning committee if officers were minded to recommended approval which they are, and attend as a ward councillor at the committee to speak about this planning application.


Hi first mate,

I'm as surprised as you that officers are saying this. Huge volte face with no discernible changes in the proposals. It smacks of a political change of heart by the Labour led council.

If approved this application will generate at least and additional 40 car spaces of parking pressure on Chesterfield Grove and surrounding streets.


Hi lisloulou84,

NCR Market often dips in the summer months as people go on holidays. Stall holders are allow to not be present for a certain number of Fris and Sats but they do seem to all go at the same time. I'll ask the markets team the exact situation.

Hi Mustard,

Without the Iceland car park I suspect the Chesterfield Grove car wash will struggle and make more impact on parking stress of Chesterfield Grove. Great chance of people using the car wash getting parking tickets.

Just received an email from council officers telling me of a 7" burst water main on Lordship Lane neasr Bew Court.

It must be really bad for such email.

Two-way traffic lights in place. It will take 3-4 days to fix.

Both pavements damaged with western one closed (but due to reopen tomorrow once repaired).

123 homes without water 60 of those in Bew Court but water expected back on imminently.

  • 2 weeks later...

The East Dulwich Safer neighburhood Team have asked me to post the following:


"

Can I just bring an operation that I did to your attention. I put together a joint operation together with BTP and the Met police incorporating our drugs dogs at East Dulwich railway station on the 31st July. During this operation we made 3 arrests and gave out several warnings for cannabis. During the operation several of the East Dulwich residents were very inquisitive, I was wondering if you would put an entry on the East Dulwich forum or on your twitter account with regards to the operation and the positive effect it will have on the local area.


The objectives of the operation was so disrupt gang activity and to tackle illegal substances coming into East Dulwich.


In connection to this my team also did a warrant in East Dulwich Grove, where we found a cannabis factory which has now been closed down.

"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...