Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My understanding is Boris is closing it and very nearly disband all the local Policing teams.

That Southwark top Police see no reason why they'd need an operational base localled having largely disbanded local policing Safer Neighbourhood Teams. Extremely depressing and completely avoidable.


So Boris will talk about maximising Police numbers but they'll spend much of their days travelling from centrlaised bases and back agian - ie. much more of eahc officers day will be unproductive.

The Lordship lane police station appears to be a complete waste of prime real estate just another maintenance and energy burden on the local tax payer.


I though the local police were already all based in Peckham?


Rationalisation and they?ll need to step in line with the real world ?.. After all this isn?t Cyprus or some 3rd world African police state.

Hi Fazer71,

Somehow the police think East Dulwich station costs them ?277,000 to run in electricity, gas bills. I've been the. It's not that hot.


The good thing about a local Police base is that officers minimise travel time - minutes to walk to a local area needing help or advice. But the Boris plan is to base our local officers in Camberwell Police station. As they won't have their own vehicles they'll reach us via buses. They'll be going a frying by bus. So much of their time will be spent unproductively. That isn't a good use of our tax payers money.


Cross party Dulwich councillors are supporting a local interim police base at the Dulwich Hospital gatehouse. This looks increasingly likely to happen.


The East Dulwich councillors eventually hope a permanent police station will be built on part of the current olive station when it's replaced.

James

Thanks for the info.

Wow ?277,000 to in electricity and gas a year, we tax payers are paying for.

Sounds very dodgy to me, typical of state run organisations.

Is there a way to check this with meter readings and a little investigation are there no systems in place?

That equates to heating around 150-200 houses quite bonkers.

Hi fazer71,

It clearly includes lots and lots of property overheads unrelated to East Dulwich. It's probably a divison of thE Met Property divison fixed cost structure.

I think the driver is more the land sale opportunity.

I'll PM you some other bits and pieces.

Hi fazer71,

I popped along and spotted about 6 puddles in 15m stretch.

Council officers have visited and assured me it will be on next year maintenace schedule.

Many thanks for pointing this out.


Regards james


fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi James

> I'll have a go next time I go past.

> Many of the puddles are are caused by slabs which

> have sunk over time below the level of the curb,

> looks like poor quality job to me.

> Cheers

Hi James,


Another two weeks has gone by and still the M&S planning application is "pending", according to the website. Could you kindly give an update on whether a decision has actually been made yet, not an intention to make a decision but an actual decision, and why the delay in posting the decision?

Hi James

did you ever find out what was happening to the trees being 'trimmed'. It seems weird to be cutting the new growth off trees in the spring. Is it a valid part of tree management, or a cunning plan by southwark to gradually kill all the trees in the borough so as to save them sweeping up the leaves??


thanks

Hi KalamtyKal,

I was emailed that a decision had been taken and I reported it. I've never experienced such slow Southwark planning portal update. Sorry but I can't second guess when officers will complete the processes they have to follow. If you ever think a councillor has leaked something then report them/me to Southwark Council monitoring officer. I can assure you yet again that I've not leaked anything.


hi First Mate,

I'll chase again for the M&S decision to be formally logged on the website. I've never had this experience before and sorry for the angst its causing you, me and others.


Hi tiddles,

This does seems bizarre. And no I've not had an officer explanation yet. What's particularly frustrating is that resources are tight and other trees desperately need trimming having been left for many years and causing a piblic nuisance.

Anything happening about all the rubbish left overnight on the streets from businesses thereby attracting lots of foxes to my road ? If the rubbish got cleared up each night I don't think the foxes would be a regular visitor as they currently are .

James,


Thank you.


At best it smacks somewhat of a lack of organisation or a very over-stretched department. I think it is also irritating because those objecting had relatively little time to do so. Nonetheless, if it is simply an oversight all well and good. However, for the avoidance of doubt, I'd still like to the decision posted on the website.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi KalamtyKal,

> I was emailed that a decision had been taken and I

> reported it. I've never experienced such slow

> Southwark planning portal update. Sorry but I

> can't second guess when officers will complete the

> processes they have to follow. If you ever think a

> councillor has leaked something then report

> them/me to Southwark Council monitoring officer. I

> can assure you yet again that I've not leaked

> anything.

>


James, as usual, you misunderstand my comment - common sense would have been to wait until planning had offically announced the decision before, in a gossiping manner, sharing the information yourself. Just say, and I'm sure it's not the case, that you had given the wrong information... not many people would be too happy.

Hi KalamityKel,

You do use unusual language to make such a point.


Huge amount of angst for and against M&S arriving and the planning applicationactually submitted.

Officers told me and emailed other residents that the application would be refused. None of those communications had embargoes and I've never seen such a decision take so very long to be recorded on the Southwark Planning portal.


We differ. I think I've been reasonable and measured. You think I've jumped the gun by telling people news officers have told me and other residents in realteively timely manner - funnily enough I delayed by a week as I was on holiday.

The Dulwich Library will now re open Monday 15 April. please see attached.


Rather unfortunate seond 6 week closure after previpus 4 week closure late 2012 but I'm hopeful we wont need any further closures for a good number of years now...

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi KalamityKel,

> You do use unusual language to make such a point.

>

> Huge amount of angst for and against M&S arriving

> and the planning applicationactually submitted.

> Officers told me and emailed other residents that

> the application would be refused. None of those

> communications had embargoes and I've never seen

> such a decision take so very long to be recorded

> on the Southwark Planning portal.

>

> We differ. I think I've been reasonable and

> measured. You think I've jumped the gun by telling

> people news officers have told me and other

> residents in realteively timely manner - funnily

> enough I delayed by a week as I was on holiday.

so what was the basis of the refusal? which residents have been informed? did you go anywhere nice for your holiday?

James, is it just me or are there loads more potholes around E Dulwich than before? I used to view them as a mild inconvenience but the other day - on the way to an important meeting - I had a tyre ripped by a pothole on Lordship Lane - on a two-week old tyre too. Has the programme of road maintenance been reduced?

Hi KK,

Loss of amenity from memory - but it was a long detailed explanation of a number of factors sent to me what 6-8 weeks ago.

Residents that had emailed the case officer received the reply and I was copied on one of them.


Regards james.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!)
    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. 
    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...