Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi shareofhouse,

The BBC link isnt working but got there via the other link.

It states 294 public bodies since 2009 have been banned some like Southwark permanently. It cited not sending back contracts in timely manner - presumably they charge a fee and I can guess how long it takes to get a legal department to check a contract especially as it will have onorous clauses - that's likely to require senior management committee authority.


I'm a member of the Audit & Goverance committee. I'll ask that it's added to the agenda as clearly something happened and councillors have not been made aware. I;l let you know what I find.

Hi James


This may have already been addressed elsewhere on the forum but, as the situation doesn't appear to be changing, I wondered if you know who is responsible for the area around the footpaths up to the platforms at ED station. The new lights outside the station are lovely (thank you), but the litter is an eyesore (which is especially bad when this is the first part of ED any visitors might see) and a danger to any wildlife living in that area.


Any help with this would be much appreciated. Thank you! :)

Hi EDLove,

Yes I agree it's hugely embarassing that so much litter is dropped let alone not picked up at our station.

Southern.

I regularly contact them about East Dulwich station issues. Litter is always mentioned and I've asked how we can permanently sort it out. But its all becoming a horrible grot spot.

Would anyone be interested in forming a Friends group?


Regards james.

Hi Rhinestone Cowboy,

We were going to have a conference call - local ED and Peckham Rye councillors with the cabinet councillor and officers. Sadly conference calls are beyond Southwark Council. I kid you not.


So instead we've been asked to give to give our written feedback.


I've lent my support that the Friern Road experimental traffic order be made permanent. Number of reasons including traffic evaporation, safer area around the school and cycle provision.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The planning application for new 100+ nursery places at Crown House, 41-43 East Dulwich Road was refused by > Southwark Council but the applicant has appealeded it.It was refused as the council doesnt think they've made enough > efforts to lease it as office spaces portecting local > employment. And also no transport report.

>

> The former is odd as with such huge shortages of nursery places many are unable to go back to work. So this feels a > red herring or illconceived. The transport issues interesting. When the council applied next door it was allowed BUT > on the condition they produce a Travel Plan.

>

> So I've contacted the planning inspector who will decide the appeal supporting the application IF a condition for a > Travel Plan is added. The planning inspector can be contacted at: [email protected] reference APP/A5840/A/12/2185756/NWF

>

> What's very frustrating is that until May 2012 this planning application would have been decided

> by the dulwich Community Council but instead

> council officers miles away made the decision -

> wrongly in my mind.


Just been notified that the appeal was successful. Please see attached.

Hopefully this nursery will proceed providing 100+ places. Chuffed to see my support reflected in the write-up of why the appeal was successful.

James


Not sure if this has been brought to your attention before but on Lordship Lane all the pavements have parts which now puddle quite badly in places.

It's particularly deep in patches between the Police station and Calloway Locks.


Any chance of getting the contractors back do the job properly ?

Hi fazer71,

Yes, their are a number of puddles around there. The problem in many cases is the private pavement areas.

If you felt able to list the puddles on council highway I'd be happy ot raise them all as requests to be fixed.

Hi James


Thank you for getting back to me so quickly.


I'm sorry to hear that even your requests are not being listened to by Southern because, as you say, the area is quite embarassing.


Can they just keep failing to deal with it? Would it make much difference if the contact details of the relevant person(s) at Southern were given so that those who care about it enough are able to exert some additional pressure?


Thanks again.

Hi EDLove,

I've also reported the broken light at the top of the ramp from platform 2.


If they keep failing to clean it then I believe we have recourse to an Environmental Act. Bit atomic but if its not fixed by the middle of next week will start that ball rolling. Might need a private posecution which would be interesting if relationship destroying.


Hi Fazer71,

I feel guilty for asking but it would be immensely helpful. With have a little sum of money we could use if we precisley document what we're asking for.


Hi TopTree,

Will look into organising this again - we did this two years ago with expectation it would be come a regular maintenance habit. How wrong.

James I asked you the following on the M&S thread, but decided to post here as you had not replied:


James,


Thank you. Do you know what the amended plan AA is? I have tried and failed to access this document several times.


This document is listed at the top of the apllication as follows:


Amended plan 1121/P (--)154 REV PE - PROPOSED SECTION AA 2013-02-21



Please noet the date for this. Still no sign of a decision.

Hi first mate,

I've been assured this week by the officers concerned that will officially release their decision - to refuse.


The Southwark website documents often confuse PC's and you need to press "Ctrl -" to reduce the size and then miraculouly the document appears. Please try that.


regards james.


EDITED To make it clear "Ctrl -"

Dear James Barber, if businesses are responsible for pavements at the front/side of their premises as area is within their curtilage and therefore do not need permission or a licence from the council to put tables & chairs out eg EDT, then can it be proper for council street sweepers to sweep the said areas?
Hi James Barber,thanks for the reply. Interesting, but not quite sure how tables & chairs that can't be walked over,negociated with a wheelchair or pram makes a pavement wider as it is unusable? Maybe I'll take down my front garden fence and get it cleaned for free!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!)
    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. 
    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...