Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is actually bare Lou.


I could get out the Oxford Shorter. But I can't be bothered.


So here's the Wikipedia entry:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_keep_and_bear_arms


>

> Pinhead.


!

>

> However...

>

> I appreciate that it could be seen as a one way

> street and I'm mainly highlighting the general

> feeling of mutual respect given to Brits since we

> share such a common history and to an extent,

> culture.


The history was one of domination and rebellion, in case that passed you by.



>

> I agree that the 'special relationship' is, a

> mainly one way street concerning U.S interests,

> but it can be beneficial when we're leaning away

> from Europe. A luxury that most E.U members don't

> enjoy.


Oh, I don't know. Spain has the whole of South America to call on.


>

> Apart from America, Russia has got to be without a

> doubt, the most pikey nation on earth.


Russian pikeys? I like the idea.


We actually have a lot of Polish peeps round these parts. Who are all very lovely.


It's far to

> big for it's own good and is run by some of the

> shadiest characters imaginable. The place is a

> mess!


I think the empire will die.


Just wondering about what to call them, in the meantime. To raise a laugh, like. BBW, I expected you to be more on the case here.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't believe

>

> a) someone was stupid enough to start this thread

>

> and

>

> b) she has got to the point, three posts in, where

> she is correcting people's spelling.

>

> 0/10



Sandperson


That's an arithmetic epic FAIL.


I notice you don't hang out in the Drawing Room. If you did, you might welcome some light relief in the Lounge from time to time.


The cheese-eating surrender monkey meme was massive; why not want to promote equal inventiveness around another target? Had a sense of humour bypass recently?

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Gun-toting, overweight; overbearing, loud-mouthed,

> thick, burger munching bastards.



I don't carry a gun, nor am I overweight, or overbearing for that matter, am rather reserved, perhaps too clever for my own good and do not like burgers (parents were married when I was born incidentally). ;)


But I don't live in the States, thank the Good Lord.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How long before we get onto the right to arm

> bears?



Now that I like, give em a sporting chance.....hmmm an idea for a new spectator sport maybe, see who gets who first, the hunter or the gun toting bear?

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> candj Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > thank the Good Lord.

>

> You were doing such a convincing job up until this

> bit!


Yup, it's when the prayer mats come out that the cat is out of the bag.

As I said early on, kind of, cheese-eating surrender monkey is a characterisation that may or may not have elements of truth. But it's got enough truth (the French are famed for their cheese; the French as a nation do not by and large go to war; but could someone explain the monkey thing to me?), and enough pithy somethingorother to make it really catchy.


So I suppose I'm looking for something that represents the US on the grand scale (something that many people do, something they are famed for producing), plus something that represents the nation/government angle. And perhaps some kind of animal ;-) All rolled into one.

The French not go to war?

Wow that's like saying the pope doesn't wipe his arse in the woods.


And like Brendan says, long been reknowned for their prowess for a very very long time.

But you hide behind one ill thought out strategic defence line......

They're actually pretty good at it too contrary to comon (well not common more like just Anglo Saxon) belief.



You'd have thought the Anglo Saxons would have had pretty good reason to believe the French were quite tasty. What with having had their arse handed to them on a tapestry, and all.

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They're actually pretty good at it too contrary to

> comon (well not common more like just Anglo Saxon)

> belief.

>

>

> You'd have thought the Anglo Saxons would have had

> pretty good reason to believe the French were

> quite tasty. What with having had their arse

> handed to them on a tapestry, and all.


That was very funny Ted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...