Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Seems to have worked in Wales:


Is the charge working?

The single use carrier bag charge was introduced to reduce the number of single use bags used.


In July 2012, the Welsh Government released a brief summary covering 13 retailers which showed reductions of 35 ? 96% since the launch of the carrier bag charge. This information, available below, is broken down by retail sector.


Food retail - between 96% and 70% reductions;

Fashion - between 75% and 68% reductions;

Home improvement - 95% reduction;

Food service - up to 45% reduction;

Telecommunications - 85% reduction.


http://www.carrierbagchargewales.gov.uk/progress/chargeworking/?lang=en

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Will an extra 50p on a ?150 quid shop really see

> use cut down that much?



You wouldnt have thought so but its like the tax disc changes - people spend thousands extra to save a small amount extra in tax.

Are people not aware that plastic carriers are made from oil and are therefore a waste of a finite resource? And have people not been using their own bags and bags for life for at least 15 years? And...what on Earth did people use before? And am I the only person who feels absolutely mortified if I forget my own reusable bag?

I am beyond mortified if I forget my bags. I have 3 bags for life (two went walkies) in my boot. It took me a while to remember to take them into the shop, but if I forgot, I'd toss my shopping into the trolley and fill up the bags in the boot. It's now second nature to grab them ... unless I kid myself I'm going in for a pint of milk and walk out with a trolley full ...


uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are people not aware that plastic carriers are

> made from oil and are therefore a waste of a

> finite resource? And have people not been using

> their own bags and bags for life for at least 15

> years? And...what on Earth did people use before?

> And am I the only person who feels absolutely

> mortified if I forget my own reusable bag?

solar Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agreed. The free ones are not strong enough,

> especially for a second use. I reuse mine to clear

> up after the dog.

> You can buy a 'bag for life' which is much

> stronger and the shop will replace it when it

> wears out.


Did you know that you can get free dog poo bags from the libraries?

Re the bags for life - there was a bloke on the radio the other day from an environmental group saying that when you looked at the energy cost that went into bags for life you would have to use them over a 100 times to recoup it compared to charging a couple of pence for every plastic carrier bag and putting that money into collection and recycling. I have to say I've never used any of my bags for life over 100 times... I keep losing them.

Whilst I have loads of the 40p fortified bags from Sainsbury's, I still prefer some of the free bags as well as they are good to reuse for tons of other things.


Does it matter that, as the use of free plastic carrier bags decline, the purchase of plastic bin liners increases?

Its taken this long to start charging for the bags, SNUB who gave out free shopper bags in East Dulwich in 2008, to help reduce the use of plastic, are now happy to finally see this happen in 2015.

It is also nice to see the original SNUB bags, still being used in Dulwich, makes me tingle all over. After 7 years, the bags still look great.

Jacqui5254 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whilst I have loads of the 40p fortified bags from

> Sainsbury's, I still prefer some of the free bags

> as well as they are good to reuse for tons of

> other things.

>

> Does it matter that, as the use of free plastic

> carrier bags decline, the purchase of plastic bin

> liners increases?



I agree I use them for lining bins, outside over for wrapping lunches in case of leakage. The list Is endless, really miss them when they are not around..... I figured I will have to just not line bins And wash them very regularly. I am sure this will increase the amount of plastic bought. Still haven't managed to purchase compost bag liners from sainsburys as they Are ALWAYS sold OUT.... The same will undoubtedly be true in relation to less 'environmental' bags. Particularly from ?1 shops..... I don't bu newspapers anymore would would be useful for a lot of these tasks, so it though it will be more work, I am prepared to do it. Somehow I believe as I usually don't take plastic bags for smaller purchased and usually use my bag or panniers, for larger shops, supermarkets force me to use bags because of all the excess packaging in the products. I think they should start there then we can use boxes from the supermarket or our own bags more easily? I always want to shed all the baggage at the cashpoint just to show the excess involved, and how much space the shopping needs. Might be good to start with the source rather than the outcome?

Whether plastics bags are free or 5-10p they are still going to be around...


People paying ?30-40 or more for shopping are not going to worry about 5-10p added to their bill.

Unless every time they are told they will be paying for the bags they will not even be aware of it..


I have used my Tesco Canvas Natural Green Bag 'bags for life' for about 5 years or more.

They are now very worn but as far as I know they are no longer available so wont be replaced..


I buy the Strong Green plastic bags at the Co-op which are 10p and re-usable time and time again.


DulwichFox

LadyNorwood Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tesco delivery driver told me that they have been

> allocated an extra few minutes per delivery since

> everything has to be unpacked individually from

> the crates......


Tesco gives you the choice of your shopping delivered in bags or not..I had mine in bags a few times untill I had a back log ..use to annoy me that they would put one or two items in each bag..so I opted for 'no bags'.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...