Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi toast!


Just found this link on FB. Wondering why you have created it as a normal page instead of a Group page. This means that if you join the group you are in effect giving perfect strangers access to your own page.


Would be happy to join a group page x

not a member of facebook unfortunately.


however re what the administrator said - its a wider community issue that future parents will be interested in (i.e. people who aren't already parents and therefore probably don't come into the family room to read about baby baths and night feeds!) think it was a bit harsh to move your thread.

If you live 300m from your school of choice you wont have to worry. If you are worried or planning a family or want to support other local families come and join the group. It really was born yesterday!

We need some assurances about places until a new primary can be built.

Local councils do monitor this type of thing so it is a chance to show the level of local concern. Over 1000 EDF users viewed the thread on primary school places just need all of them to join to show it's a hot issue and then invite councillors to join.


Thanks

I put in a Freedom of Information request on 7th August, but haven't even had an acknowledgement yet.


I'll follow it up.


I suggest we get along to this lib dem councullor meet up at the one o'c club (is it Tuesday)


and also organise a public meeting, inviting local councillors from P Rye, ED and College wards, plus the head of admissions.


Suggest we book a room, say at darrell rd community centre, invite the speakers and make some leaflets/little posters to distribute.


We need a snappy name with a good acronym..

We have 4 politicians on the page and they have said that they will keep us informed and post the councils latest plans for next year. It will also be a useful group to join if you are going through the admissions process as we can support each other if admissions dont turn our as you hoped come April.


Decisions are being made by the council now and the next few weeks so it is a good time to have a show of strength. There has been suggestion that this has been a freek year but anyone who lives in the area knows that next year the demand for school places will be greater not less. Strenght in numbers so do join and invite anyone you think might be interested.


http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=120669739604&ref=nf

  • 2 weeks later...
Very pleased to report that this facebook group has had input from a range of local councillors. If you are interested in this issue please join and invite your friends to join. It is relevant to anyone who has been through the admissions drama this year, anyone applying for 2010 and anyone who will be applying from here on in, if you have a baby or are expecting! It is a group page so no one will have access to your own page. Come and have a look using the link above.

It is a great post by Fiona Colley because at last a politician is talking about action they will take - rather than just talking about how it is nobody's fault etc, etc. It would be great to see all the local councillors acting in concert in a non political way to get action on this issue.


It would also be nice to know where Peckham Rye's councillors have gone - a major local issue and not a peep from them!!

Hi Toast

I joined the facebook page today. We have to apply for Jan 2010 intake and I feel if we leave it up to the councillors things will not move quickly enough. Is there an actual action group of parents who are actively campaigning? We really need this to be a national story and 'go to the top'. I am a typical 'Londoner'- working class northerner who got a degree and moved to London to get a decent job and a better life- only to find that I am now failing my child by potentially sending her to a failing school (while the small rural school I went to has a glowing report). Sorry I digress but I feel very strongly about this situation. Please let me know if there is an active action group of parents and if so what I and other parents can do to help now. Thank you.

Interested to hear why you say the school is failing?

SATS results do not define this. Mixed ability intakes and a diversity in home support means that London schools are presented with a very different set of challenges and outcomes. The teaching and environment can still be good. And kids that are well supported at home usually do well at primary level. So is your problem the school or the intake of the school?

The facebook page is just a forum to unite parents. If anyone wants to start something more, i'm in!


Have to comment on huncamunca's post. Its a bit rough to question wheather a parent is calling a school 'failing' because of the intake. Failing is failing (special measures), and sleepy bunny has every right to feel let down if the only school her child can go to is in special measures. Its not wrong to want your childs school well managed.


Edited to be less grumpy

huncamunca Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interested to hear why you say the school is

> failing?

> SATS results do not define this. Mixed ability

> intakes and a diversity in home support means that

> London schools are presented with a very different

> set of challenges and outcomes. The teaching and

> environment can still be good. And kids that are

> well supported at home usually do well at primary

> level. So is your problem the school or the

> intake of the school


Lets face facts, Southwark schools are not as well managed as others e.g. Lewisham. The local council are not good at managing schools! They are out of touch, examples of this include OFSTED reports, their total inability to provide school places and their inability to take the local schools crisis as anything other than moaning middle classes. When people take action about poor management they are supporting Southwark schools. Most parents i know would prefer an authentic mix in their childs classroom and their issue is with how kids/ teachers/ Schools ect are supported and managed!

I totally agree with TOAST. It's not wrong to want your kids school well managed!

  • 3 weeks later...

huncamunca Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interested to hear why you say the school is

> failing?

> SATS results do not define this. Mixed ability

> intakes and a diversity in home support means that

> London schools are presented with a very different

> set of challenges and outcomes. The teaching and

> environment can still be good. And kids that are

> well supported at home usually do well at primary

> level. So is your problem the school or the

> intake of the school


Quite harsh huncamunca! One of my main concerns from the Ofsted report was the pastoral care within the school. It claimed many of the children there felt threatened or scared of other children, I spoke to a senior teacher there who reassured me that systems were in place to improve this, but likewise did not deny that this has been the case, if you had concerns regarding this wouldn't you be concerned about sending your child there?

sleepybunny, no one would want to send their child to a school where they thought that child may be frightened. However Ofsted is a snapshot of the few days that they visit (not saying they were wrong, I have no idea, just that it may not have been wholly representative of all the childen's experience). However you will note that subsequent ofsted reports have very firmly said that this is not an area of concern anymore. Things can and do change for the better very quickly.


I'm no fan of Southwark LEA, far from it, but don't underestimate the power of committed parents who can make a real difference to any school. It seems to me that the parents of pre-school children posting on this and similar threads will be an asset to whatever school their children join. However it's hard to do that if the school is miles away. Don't write off your local only on the ofsted report (not directed to you sleepybunny, obvious from your post that you have spoken to teachers too). Go and see for yourselves, talk to parents and the pta.


Good luck people

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am delighted to hear the development was approved.  In my opinion, the UK is building far too little housing. And unless we build on green belts, the only solution is to increase the density of our cities, which is exactly what this scheme achieves.  Where I'm from (France), planning is generally looser and in my home city it's common to see single dwellings being razed to make way for a 5-6 story block of flats, even in city centres. Does it change the character of the local area? For sure! But I don't see another way to provide the supply to meet demand and provide ample supply of housing for a growing population. My personal experience is that in the UK, there is a lot more time spent on consultations, on achieving a perfect outcome for everyone. This results in generally better and more harmonious building than in France, but it makes things slower and more costly, with the need to coordinate many consultants.  It's interesting to compare France and the UK as they have similar populations and population growth, with an economy centred on a huge capital city. When you look at the number of houses/flats built in France and the UK over the past 10 years, the result is pretty striking. # France UK Difference 2023 298,100 150,370 -147,730 2022 392,100 182,070 -210,030 2021 410,000 177,160 -232,840 2020 368,800 129,440 -239,360 2019 387,700 153,000 -234,700 2018 401,200 168,610 -232,590 2017 434,700 164,110 -270,590 2016 370,000 155,150 -214,850 2015 341,000 148,150 -192,850 2014 336,900 140,760 -196,140 2013 357,900 124,790 -233,110 2012 382,300 101,020 -281,280 Total 4,480,700 1,794,630 -2,686,070 Average 373,392 149,553 -223,839 When HS1 was built, the French engineers (it was built with the French high-speed signalling) were surprised at how Brits wanted to "gold-plate" everything. The UK arguably has the best, most effective, more reliable, more well-equipped high-speed line in the world, but we've only got 68 miles of it and it cost 2.5 times what it cost the French to build a line extension at the same time.  In my view, there's no magic wand: just deciding who will be the losers. In France, people in established neighbourhoods my lose out as they see them change dramatically, while the new entrants benefit from a much higher supply of housing (and thus cheaper housing). In the UK, we give greater priority to preserving the lifestyle and amenity of the established dwellers over the new entrants who lose out as the supply is choked and prices are higher. A final point of comparison would be the price per square foot of property in Greater Paris is £467 while in Greater London it's £667 - 30% cheaper!
    • This web page lists some companies that recycle CDs https://www.reducereuserecycle.co.uk/where_can_I_recycle/cds_and_dvds.php  
    • I heard it as well, woke me up, very strange.  I don't care for myself but I do worry for people with children and animals, it is a nuisance and happens more and more nowadays.
    • Has that ever actually happened? The bags are quite bright, and don't blend in with the pavement, so are quite noticeable. But surely there can't be many  cases where someone has bothered to put the s**t in a bag,  but then just leaves the bag on the pavement?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...