Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lady M when I reached 1000 posts on the forum I

> posted it and then 1001.....I think you missed

> yours (1600ish already) watch and learn ;-)



*curtseys most respectfully in acknowledgement of being taught by a Master*

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7567-100s/page/3/#findComment-288059
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 9 months later...

In the absence of Quids.


DECISION:


Diplomatic Immunity Plea rejected.


Grounds: failure of the defendant to satisfy this Court that he is entitled to diplomatic immunity. Moreover, Exhibit A (threads from the EDF) corroborates this by providing irrefutable evidence of an inability to conduct himself remotely diplomatically contrary to the EDF Regulations as laid out by Mark.


Sentence:


(1) Community Service Order:

You are required to keep the streets of ED free of snow, ice and dog poo for a period of one month.


You are to assist cooking-challenged forumites with various cooking tasks. Tasks to include:


- showing Katie1997 how to cook rice without the benefit of a rice cooker

- demonstrating to HAL9000 how to peel/crush garlic and extract juice from lemons

- aiding Helen Graves with the peeling of some 5 billion chick peas.


Furthermore, you are to give a demonstration on how to bake the best Irish Soda Bread. This demonstration to take place at 8pm 10th December at the next EDF Drinks.


(2) Exclusion Order:

You are to refrain from posting in The Lounge for a period of one month. Conversely you are obliged to post in the Drawing Room at least 50 times a day. Any inappropriate postings will result in your facing a specialist panel comprised of: Huguenot, Mockney Piers and DJKillaQueen.


(3) Curfew Order:

You are not at liberty to attend the EDF's offices for a period of one month except for the purpose of feeding and combing the Forum's mangey and flea-ridden pet dog: Woofmarkthedog.


(4) Probation order:

You are required to report to SeanMacGabann twice daily.


(5) Supervision Order:

Power is hereby given to Quids who will take overall responsibility for your supervision. Should you fail to keep the peace and/or conduct yourself in a manner appropriate to ED folk, Quids may issue whatever further penalty he deems appropriate. This could include, but is not limited to, installing you in the specially erected stocks on Goose Green where the yummy mummies of ED and their sprogs would be encouraged to have a field day (egged on by the likes of HonaloochieB, karter and VerryBerryCherry). Such an "event" would be supervised by Mick Mac.


( 6) Forfeiture Order:

For breach of Rule 5.6(A)III(xi) of Master Quids' 100s Game, your falsely claimed 100 is to be surrendered immediately and given instead to the more worthy player: Ladymuck.


You have 7 days in which to lodge an appeal with Legalbeagle.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7567-100s/page/3/#findComment-389578
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thieving?


Well! I simply cannot permit such an allegation to go unchallenged.


Section 1 of the Theft Act 1968 states that: a person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it. Yes indeedy.


Was there dishonesty? Nope. We are talking about a pursuit created by the elusive Master Quids. I, for once, abided by the rules. You could have played, but failed to do so in time. In other words, you lack the necessary speed and proficiency for the game.


Was there appropriation? Well, I guess it could be argued that there was. BUT...as dishonesty is manifestly absent from your most ungracious charge, then the appropriation becomes irrelevant.


Was there property? Again yes, but without the element of dishonesty you don't have a toe to stand on. Not a carpal.


Did it involve property belonging to another? Nope. The 6000 was available for all to play. Though for the avoidance of doubt, I should state that the 6,000 now firmly belongs to the highly skilled moi. Oooooh yes.


Was there an intention to permanently deprive? Of course there was! That's the point of the game. You had your chance, but you blew it.


*thinks: AMATEUR*

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7567-100s/page/3/#findComment-393610
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.facebook.com/labourparty/posts/when-your-family-and-friends-ask-you-what-labour-has-achieved-so-far-send-them-t/1090481149116565/    Do you mean going from rhyming with Message to rhyming with Massage?  Or was it really a hard g to start with, rhyming, say,  with Farague/Faraig or Fararg?
    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...