Jump to content

Recommended Posts

LegalEagle-ish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> MP - did they wake the neighbours?



I don't think Michael will know that Legal since he's not talking to his neighbours any more. This is due to his farts setting off all their car alarms at 6 in the morning.


He's pretty regular with his wind.

I once saw a show in Bangkok where various musical instruments were played and various objects propelled through the medium of fanny-farts.


There then followed an earnest debate how the performers found out that they had such powers. Was it:


1 - Passed down from Mother to Daughter

or

2 - Learned at College - with an NVQ in Vaginal Propellant Studies Level 2 attained


My own flatus is less well controlled, but it does keep the foxes at bay.

I prefer the term 'wave machine'.


To really benefit from the effect of a particular noxious, rectal meltdown I assume the birthing position to really clear the way for the impending hurricane that's about to exit my balloon knot.


Summon the full cooperation of your diaphram and really force the gas out.


Waft the results up to your nose by causing a ripple across the duvet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If anyone has any spare tickets for Crystal Palace on Sunday let me know!
    • The tenant's business has already failed. If the landlord doesn't accept it, they can have a vacant property, stand in the queue of creditors, and get paid little or nothing. It's a gamble that the restructuring will work and the tenant will start paying rent again. Commercial properties are often hard to let. 🤷
    • An inquiry will put a huge amount of time and resource into looking at what happened in the past and why it happened and who was responsible and, in a year or two maybe more, a report will be produced and actions may or may not be taken, some of those responsible for bad decisions will already have resigned and moved on.   Given that we now already understand some of the issues that allowed this awful behaviour to continue unchallenged, my concern is less about whether there is an inquiry to examine what happened in the past but about what is being done right now to protect girls and young women from predatory and exploitative men in whatever race or identity they come in. Inquiries examine the past but don't necessarily solve problems and they certainly don't come up with conclusions quickly which is why they can often feel hollow.  I'd rather see perpetrators and those that let the perpetrators act with impunity, actually being prosecuted and an inquiry won't do that.  I suspect that's why some MPs voted against an inquiry. But do feel free to give me examples of inquiries that really made a difference and actually changed things in a timely and effective way.      
    • In recent consultation on further ED CPZ the majority of respondents were against. Fully appreciate you may not live on a road proposed for CPZ. If you are close to that area it is likely you will be affected by parking displacement if the CPZ goes in. I was just curious what James Barber's position on this is? Perhaps he'll come on here and let us know. He was always really good at visiting the forum.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...