Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey, I had a friend who wore a silver band on her wedding finger and wondered why she couldn't get a man.


When I pointed out the obvious, she said she couldn't take it off because it would be bad luck.


:))


Good luck bbkings, and just go for it - what's the worst that could happen? A bit of embarrassment.

FluffyGalore Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If she's not wearing any rings then it's game on

> for you, doesn't matter if she says she's got a

> BF; no rings, no strings :-) Good luck.



and what if she happens to be a lesbian in a long-term relationship?;-)

and what if she happens to be a lesbian in a long-term relationship?


She will be flattered by the attention nonetheless and go home and brag to her GF that some guy chatted her up in the park. Her GF may become terrified that she may lose her, and to a man, and promptly propose. :))

This is interesting as these are traits I see in myself too :-)


But Jumpinjackflashes description matches pretty well, anyway slept on all the comments and am going to take the plunge next time whether she's married with child or not, if nothing else, just to make her day.

FluffyGalore Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and what if she happens to be a lesbian in a

> long-term relationship?

>

> She will be flattered by the attention nonetheless

> and go home and brag to her GF that some guy

> chatted her up in the park. Her GF may become

> terrified that she may lose her, and to a man, and

> promptly propose. :))



Or she may knee him in the groin, poke his eyes out and set the dog on him...oooh gosh, you've got me going now!

monica Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What a lovely story, I Agree with whoever

> suggested striking up a conversation about her

> lovely dog, go for it life is too short for ifs

> and buts.(Im married and totally in love, but I

> have a crush and its lovely but strange because I

> have a crush at my age>:D<)


Does your husband know?

FluffyGalore Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or she may knee him in the groin, poke his eyes

> out and set the dog on him...oooh gosh, you've got

> me going now!

>

> Can't say I've ever done that to a man who's tried

> to chat me up, even though a few of them had been

> beaten with he ugly stick.



I initially read that as you beat them with their own ugly sticks.

bbkings Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is interesting as these are traits I see in

> myself too :-)

>

> But Jumpinjackflashes description matches pretty

> well, anyway slept on all the comments and am

> going to take the plunge next time whether she's

> married with child or not, if nothing else, just

> to make her day.


Bad move there BB, ignore the life style coaches on here telling you to'go for it' and 'faint heart never won fair maid'.

Shadenfreude junkies all of them.

No, worship her from afar and forever wonder what might have been. Play sad songs on the stereo and have a little weep in an ecstacy of melancholy.

You'll probably get a few songs/poems/short stories out of it.

Or a limerick anyway.

jumpinjackflash Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> monica Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What a lovely story, I Agree with whoever

> > suggested striking up a conversation about her

> > lovely dog, go for it life is too short for ifs

> > and buts.(Im married and totally in love, but I

> > have a crush and its lovely but strange because

> I

> > have a crush at my age>:D

> Does your husband know?



Well?;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Approved scheme usually have three years to start. Start can be pretty minuscule in practice.
    • Ofcom states how to formally complain - https://www.ofcom.org.uk/make-a-complaint/complain-about-postal-services/royal-mail/ 1st step Royal Mail - https://www.royalmail.com/sites/default/files/Complaint_Handling_Process_AUG_2019.pdf  03457 740 740 https://help.royalmail.com/s/contactsupport/wheresmyitem Failing that - you can seek compensation form Royal Mail - https://personal.help.royalmail.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/325 I've never needed to tried these - so if anyone has please let us know. 2nd step Postal Redress - https://www.cedr.com/consumer/postrs/overview/
    • We receive (should receive) 20-30 items of post a week, some subscription magazines, catalogues and (about a third) normal business mail (personal mail is far less frequent, save over Christmas and birthdays).  This tends to arrive in only two (more frequently one) delivery. Magazines are invariably late, often up to a week late. Not good for political weeklies. This has been my 'steady state' position following much worse frequency on the closure of the real ED Delivery Office, and of course Covid. There seems little point in complaining any longer - to anyone. There will be a sudden flurry of mail delivered, of course, in the few days after an MP intervention, and then it falls back into rubbish deliveries. It is a combination of senior management focus on high(er) value parcel and special delivery items (which I do get more regularly) which is a management decision, under-employment (vacancies) of posties and, I believe, extremely poor local management of what resources  Royal Mail actually has in Peckham. I don't now believe it is curable. I do believe that no one in Royal Mail management gives a sh*t!
    • The US has been one of the most dynamic high growth economies for several years. They have planning zones. The two are not mutually exclusive.  Two recent mobile phone mast applications in the area. Both of such terribly poor quality they were refused. They both broke the code of conduct all mobile operators singed up to. The agents were just trying it on. So huge cost of repetition and low productivity. Planning is blamed but it's just shoddy work.  Recent case of the new Kent Thame tunnel talking about £200m of planning costs - which turned out to be design, project planning and planning. I would suggest mostly the former.  It is lazy to blame planning process and generally by those who wont a no holes bar approach for their schemes without any consideration of the opportunity cost imposed on others.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...