Jump to content

FOR SALE, ?70, Screaming Eagle Silencer Kit for Harley Davidson, 80258-99A


natascha

Recommended Posts

Pristine as new,

Screaming Evragle Silencers Kit Mufflers in original box

Bal.Cut

FXD Chrome

From For Harley Davidson


"Interesting comment I found I regards to the silencers,the one I am selling is from 2005, so the original one not the updated version which doesn't sound Harley like.


There is a very large misconception in the eBay community about the HD SEII & Screaming Eagle slip-on mufflers.


1st and foremost, Harley quit making the SE II's in June of 2006 and dealers were told not to sell anymore after July, '06. The new and "improved" Screaming Eagle slip-on's are the newly designed, EPA regulated, legal in 49 states, JUNK that Harley has to sell now. If you want your scoot to sound anything like a Harley, do NOT buy the new slip-on's. You will waste your money.


The following part #'s are for Screaming Eagle Pro II's ( SE II"s) for Dyna's '95 and later:


80258-99A- Baloney Cut-Chrome


80293-99A- Slash Down-Chrome


80331-99A Baloney Cut- Black coated


80334-99A Slash Down- Black coated


80299-02 Straight Cut, requires 2 end caps.


Screaming Eagle Pro Slip-Fit Torque Mufflers:


80061-00 These look identical to the stock pipes. Notice they do not say Screaming Eagle II but they are the older version. Fits '95 and later Dynas.


Hope this helps clarify the difference between the two! "


Can be viewed before buying in SE21


?70 or best offer would be great


Many thanks, Natascha

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Tommy has been servicing our boiler for a number of years now and has also carried out repairs for us.  His service is brilliant; he’s reliable, really knowledgeable and a lovely guy.  Very highly recommended!
    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...