Jump to content

Sky signal blocked by scaffold - please vote on course of action you would take...


Recommended Posts

If you put up a large scaffold around your house and your neighbour told you it blocked their sky signal would you:


a) apologize and offer to pay for an engineer to fix their signal

b) ignore them

c) deny that your scaffold was the cause


Please vote now - I really want to know what most people would do


Thanks in advance

go with a).


It's the decent thing to do, they may have a legal claim against you if you have caused the problem and they could also cause trouble for your redevelopment.


The dish may just need a slight height adjustment to solve the issue but do shop around for engineers as they can vary in price/quality.


B) and c) probably a bit tricky to run now you've asked the question on a public forum

Is this some kind of passive agressive thing? You won't ask them for the money outright but you are hoping that they will see it on the forum and somehow be "shamed" into offering you the money?


If you really wAnt to get your money back, then you should just ask them directly. Otherwise probably best to just let it go.

d) This is a big city and this kind of thing happens all over said city (Google it) and it's only temporary after all and an inconvenience, I know, but if we had blocked light into a window and you had paid to have a series of mirrors rigged to get back that light I don't think you'd expect us to pay for it - you'd probably just moan and put up with it and wait for the scaff to come down and normality to be resumesd - like thousands of Londoners have done with scaffolding (for many may reaons) in the past and like they will do in the future. It IS a pain but really - that's life in town, kid.

This is definitely something you should make a big deal over.


I mean it's not as if you have to live next door to each other; see each other every day; hear each other over the fence / through the wall all the time .. or possibly have other neighbour-related issues that might need joint co-operation in the future which will in due course be influenced by you seething over not being able to watch Eggheads - so yes - it's absolutely vital for your own wellbeing and future happiness that you escalate this situation as early as possible.

The great news is that now you've started two threads about it on the local very well-read internet forum, they're guaranteed to have seen them both.


Congratulations - you are now officially 'at war' for the next ten years.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> d) This is a big city and this kind of thing

> happens all over said city (Google it) and it's

> only temporary after all and an inconvenience, I

> know, but if we had blocked light into a window

> and you had paid to have a series of mirrors

> rigged to get back that light I don't think you'd

> expect us to pay for it - you'd probably just moan

> and put up with it and wait for the scaff to come

> down and normality to be resumesd - like thousands

> of Londoners have done with scaffolding (for many

> may reaons) in the past and like they will do in

> the future. It IS a pain but really - that's life

> in town, kid.


But it's SKY - WWE, Footie.


A man cannot live by Netflix alone :)


I'd be like the painting of The SCREAM


probably (a) but I'm too nice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for clarifying, James. So why would anybody want to take this on as a franchise if it is staying in this building? If it is now to be a sub office, does that mean that much of  the space could be used as a different kind of business altogether, with just part of it being used as a sub Post Office? Because if it is all to remain solely for Post Office business, (albeit as a sub Post Office it won't be providing all the services which it currently does) I can't see who would want to take it over? If it isn't profitable as a Crown office, how could it be  profitable running just as a sub office, even if staff are being paid less and it's opening for longer hours? Because presumably all the other overheads such as rent will remain the same?
    • Girobank was genuinely innovative, regarding the addressed customer base (significantly the previously unbanked) - but this would have been an ideally outsourced operation to an existing bank which already had the operational systems (and the regulatory experts) to manage a bank for someone else at marginal cost. The Post Office - when you consider the issues over the Horizon software - never originally designed by ICL/ Fujitsu for the application it ran - is a very good reason why the Post Office being involved in banking was long-term a bad idea.  To get back to the topic of this thread, the Horizon debacle is still not over (the software system is still in place) - most of the wrongly penalised sub-postmasters are still out of pocket - I'm not sure I would be leaping to take on the franchise being offered in Lordship Lane.
    • Otherwise in Bellenden Road are brilliant! They’ve made me stage dresses, restructured vintage finds and are working on remodelling my late brothers huntsman tweed suit for my modern husband! Not cheap and rents have meant they are moving premises at mo.
    • Penguin, I broadly agree, except that the Girobank was a genuinely innovative and successful operation. It’s rather ironic that after all these years we are now back to banking at the Post Office due to all the bank branch closures.  I agree that the roots of the problem go back further than 2012 (?), when the PO and RM were separated so RM could be sold. I’m willing to blame Peter Mandelson, Margaret Thatcher or even Keith Joseph. But none of them will be standing for the local council, hoping to make capital out of the possible closure of Lordship Lane PO, as if they are in no way responsible. The Lib Dems can’t be let off the hook that easily.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...