Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Rome has built a 10 Kilometre stretch of wall to enable Graffiti Artists to express themselves in the hope that they will then leave other Roman buildings and walls alone.


Is this the way forward?


Would you like a similar wall built around East Dulwich, for example?

Has the wall been built 'around' Rome?


Are you comparing East Dulwich to Rome?


Anyway, to try answer to your thread title, which is very different to the questions that you pose in the thread, I say both.


Like most things in life (and you, Tony, with your degree of wisdom and knowledge garnered over your many years in south London and beyond, should know this better than anybody)there is good graffiti and there is crap graffiti.


If somebody has an eye for colour, shape, space and depth they can paint something that will potentially look great and brighten up a drab area or create something that has an element of social commentary to it.


Also, if an artist has gone to great lengths to put their piece in a visible but dangerous / risky place then I'd be more impressed with this than a little shit that had just sprayed or etched their tag on a shopfront or bus window, /shutter/wall etc etc.


This last example shows no imagination or talent.


So it's impossible to categorise all graffiti simply as 'crap' or 'not crap'.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spot on Horsebox. In the 80s especially, you saw

> some amazing graffiti. These days, it seems to be

> more of the stupid tags.


Yeah but Keef you're just showing your age as I now will... up until Graffitti 'art' emerged there used to be some great actual sloganised graffitti that was then covered with 'art' in the 1980s....going into Paddington station there used to be this massive "Arise you unwashed proles from infront of your TVs" or something...got covered with shitty graffitti in the 80s. I think that there is still a "George Davis is innocent" somewhere and of course Banksy has moved it beyond the mindless tagging

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Human graffiti is no different than animals scent

> marking their territory...


Care to expand on this? You don't say whether you think it's a good/bad thing and it's too simplistic to compare graffiti to an animal marking it's territory. Sure, gang signs and names etc are thrown up on Walls but these are rarely of artistic merit.


Can you draw (excuse the pun) no distinction between artists such as d-face (now living in se22 I believe) who has put 3D resin models in the street/ on buildings and which could be still described as graffiti, or Eine, whos 2-tone six-foot letters can be found all over shoreditch shop fronts and under bridges and which bring a real

focal point to some otherwise drab surroundings and which were an antidote to the mindless scrawl which adorned many of the old shops prior to this, and the dripping, mindless postcodes which can be found sprayed all

over estates across London?

(posting from iphone so

apologies

for

formatting, puntuality etc etc)

The OP asked whether graffiti was 'a pathetic attempt at visibility', I think it goes a lot deeper than society's lazy view that all it amounts to is wanton vandalism. Why does it have to be 'a good/bad thing', can it not just 'be'?..

Red Devil, I don't understand the point you are trying to make. You say graffiti goes deeper than being wanton vandalism

but then in the next line appear to suggest that 'it is what it is'.


I'm confused by this.


And to be pedantic, the OP asked whether it was 'a pathetic attempt at visibility OR modern art'. You haven't really offered an answer to this question.

In answer to the OP... I don't see the harm in providing this area for graffiti. Many people believe it's a valid artform worthy of merit, etc, then why not provide facilities.


Obviously it won't stop mindless vandalism and territorial "tagging" though.

Bastards the lot of ?em. The odd comedy penis or your mate?s mobile number advertised as an all night sex line I can deal with but why for the love of god do these spray-can wielding prats insist on covering every concrete skatepark from London to Brisbane with their art (and I use the term lightly). Skateboarding is dangerous enough without someone covering the surface you are doing it on with paint giving it about as much grip as wet glass.


They have some kind of misconception that skateboarding is somehow ?street? and ?edgy? and therefore they will be tolerated or even welcomed. Well it?s not and you won?t Mr Graffitist so just piss off and go deface a Tescos or something.


Yours truly,

Grumpy old skateboarder.

Graffiti: A pathetic attempt at visibility or MODERN ART????


as far as I am concerned... there is no question at all....


go to the next Can Festival, see the artists at work, no one with half a brain could be then left asking that same old question!


open your eyes... look around you, see london for what it is, in all its glory, grit and texture... of course there is some inane rubbish... but there is also some amazing art out there, work that bypasses the galleries and uses the street as it's canvass... bloody brilliant

http://www.urban75.org/london/images/brick-lane-09.jpg


http://pinewooddesign.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/banksy/Banksy3.jpg



http://bartosik.org/scrapbook/cans_festival/cans.htm


http://jetcomx.com/2008/05/06/banksys-art-gallery-from-the-cans-festival-in-london/



watch out... I could be inspired become the EDF online visual vandal if this post runs....

http://www.kabe243.com/blog/uploaded_images/this-is-awesome-graffiti-766765.jpg

HEAR HEAR! charliecharlie. spot on!

graffiti is far from a "pathetic attempt at visibility".

how could it be so when 99.9% of graffiti artists attempt to remain INvisible, and stay "under the radar" so to speak.

look along te train tracks on your way to work, look at that dusty white van on the shopping street corner, look at this art we display with such DISDAIN!

such would not be of picasso, or van gogh, except if they were still alive???

we must not kill off graffiti artists, and/or make them waste their lives away in prison,

if someone cannot draw, do we take away their paper?

such is the way of the so called "pathetic attempt at visibility" it is practice, and the majority of artists will paint over the old works.

http://www.artofthestate.co.uk/photos/eine_mash_the_tate.jpg


hey horsebox are you trying to out visual me??? could be pistols (or cans) at dawn...


http://www.weird-websites.info/Graffitti/images/london-street-art-graffitti-mans-head.jpg


and here's one for the doubters


http://www.cpluv.com/www/medias/peterdzign/peterdzign_453c9dabdea21.gif

Awesome pictures, nashoi.


Chair... I disagree. The photos demonstrate artistic merit, i.e. a direct response to the question in the title.


The problem is differentiating the art from the mindless vandalism, it's not always an easy distinction to make - at least not in written terms. How do you define laws which allow art to be created on a garage or along a railway, but at the same time protect historical buildings, people's homes, etc?

i remember heading down to unity in fulham in the 90's. graffiti has been part of my life since the 80's and all the above definitely prove that it is an art form.


however, i think the mistake (sorry tony.london.suburbs) is asking the broad question (i made the same mistake with the thinkers thread). basically, tagging is like animals on heat leaving a mark. but graffiti is not tagging, i think this has to understood before discussing...


a debate that has raged for years in the graff community questions whether once artists commit to canvass can they still be considered graffiti art?


some famous faves of mine (sadly i have no pics on this computer) include delta and she 1. in my mind they represent both art and graffiti.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...