Jump to content

Siberian cat needs re-homing


Lucyalexandra

Recommended Posts

Hi there. Our two year old siberian cat called Mischa is forever hunting and bringing in birds, frogs and mice. A neighbour recently complained to us about her and asked us to keep her indoors for two weeks as there is a birds nest in their garden their kids are watching and they were upset to see Mischa trying to maraud it. Does anyone have any ideas about a suitable home for a cat who loves to hunt? I wish I could find a friendly farmer with room for her! She will hate being cooped up and I do think we will need to re-home her. She isn't really suited to families as she can be overly playful and run after ankles and things. We have three kids and I was fine living with her and her idiosyncrasies until this complaint. She does need a watchful eye on her when the kids are around and i would sometimes keep her contained when necessary, with access to the cat flap. A real cat lover who doesn't mind her idiosyncrasies is what is needed. She is very affectionate to her adult companion when she feels so inclined. She is intelligent and very loving when she wants to be. Any ideas anyone?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/73427-siberian-cat-needs-re-homing/
Share on other sites

I will try it and thanks. but I think that ultimately she is going to cause strain with the neighbour who complained so I may be better finding her another, hopefully loving home ... she will continue to hunt and if they really don't like that I suspect the bell will lessen the success with the hunting but won't put an end to it ...

Any cat would go after a birds nest, surely? It's in their nature.


Do your neighbours not have other cats who go into their garden?


It seems a shame to give up your cat just because she does what all cats do - and I say that as both a cat lover and a bird lover ......

no, it is cat instinct. I think your neighbour is being unrealistic. If you cat isn't there another will come along - yours is probably not the only one to prowl the gardens.


A bell will help warn little creatures but they could put a protective net around the nest or use a repellent, like this one, which will keep all cats away (not just yours).


http://www.amazon.co.uk/PestBye-Battery-Operated-Cat-Repeller/dp/B004SGC75S/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1441451723&sr=8-3&keywords=catwatch


I'd be mortified if my neighbour said I should get rid of my cats because they go in their garden. I'd probably buy them one of these.

Cats hunt! I think your neighbour is being unreasonable too. I'd much prefer to see a beautiful Siberian cat doing what it's designed to do - sadly it's one of life's harsh lessons. Cats eat birds. Birds eat worms etc etc. bet they don't mind seeing the odd worm being hunted to death to feed the chicks.


Sorry. Ranting. But sad that you feel you have to re home your cat.

Cats can just kill for the heck of it and will not always eat what they have killed! It is more that they are triggered to perform hunting behaviour, and enjoy it. Two possible solutions; one is that your neighbours take measures, as described above, to keep puss out of their garden, the other is to start to play games that tap into and allow your cat an outlet for its strong instinctive drive to hunt.
Thanks everyone - I agree it's just nature and was quite taken aback. Will see what happens with the bell. You can't say you are teaching your kids about nature and then get offended by what is natural instinct. And I can't give the cat a lobotomy to alter her nature :-/

You could buy one of these and put it by the nest. The birds don't hear it but the cats do. I used it to keep the neighbours cat from crapping in my garden and it seemed to work. Although the cat also knows there's a random chance it will get the hose if it tries it when I'm about so that message might also have sunk in.


http://www.amazon.co.uk/PestBye-Battery-Operated-Cat-Repeller/dp/B004SGC75S/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1441499269&sr=8-1&keywords=cat+repeller

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for clarifying, James. So why would anybody want to take this on as a franchise if it is staying in this building? If it is now to be a sub office, does that mean that much of  the space could be used as a different kind of business altogether, with just part of it being used as a sub Post Office? Because if it is all to remain solely for Post Office business, (albeit as a sub Post Office it won't be providing all the services which it currently does) I can't see who would want to take it over? If it isn't profitable as a Crown office, how could it be  profitable running just as a sub office, even if staff are being paid less and it's opening for longer hours? Because presumably all the other overheads such as rent will remain the same?
    • Girobank was genuinely innovative, regarding the addressed customer base (significantly the previously unbanked) - but this would have been an ideally outsourced operation to an existing bank which already had the operational systems (and the regulatory experts) to manage a bank for someone else at marginal cost. The Post Office - when you consider the issues over the Horizon software - never originally designed by ICL/ Fujitsu for the application it ran - is a very good reason why the Post Office being involved in banking was long-term a bad idea.  To get back to the topic of this thread, the Horizon debacle is still not over (the software system is still in place) - most of the wrongly penalised sub-postmasters are still out of pocket - I'm not sure I would be leaping to take on the franchise being offered in Lordship Lane.
    • Otherwise in Bellenden Road are brilliant! They’ve made me stage dresses, restructured vintage finds and are working on remodelling my late brothers huntsman tweed suit for my modern husband! Not cheap and rents have meant they are moving premises at mo.
    • Penguin, I broadly agree, except that the Girobank was a genuinely innovative and successful operation. It’s rather ironic that after all these years we are now back to banking at the Post Office due to all the bank branch closures.  I agree that the roots of the problem go back further than 2012 (?), when the PO and RM were separated so RM could be sold. I’m willing to blame Peter Mandelson, Margaret Thatcher or even Keith Joseph. But none of them will be standing for the local council, hoping to make capital out of the possible closure of Lordship Lane PO, as if they are in no way responsible. The Lib Dems can’t be let off the hook that easily.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...