Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I will always intervene if there's a danger to a woman, I did recently and got a bit of a kicking but I would do it again in a second because that's how I was brought up, I have a child on the way now so the reasons for intervening other than that would have to be pretty serious as the chances of getting hurt are quite high, but if we don't intervene when we can then society as a whole will suffer and to be honest i want as nice a place as possible for my little one to grow up.
It may be that we have gone to far down the "pass by on the other side" for it to change. If everybody "stood up" it might make a difference. The occasional "have a go hero" is unexpected and not taken into account by the perpetrators of crime any more. But as to whether or not it is worth it... what kind of society do you want to live in? There are middle roads - doing what is safely possible without exposing yourself to personal physical attack - calling for help, making as much noise as possible, standing up to be a witness to events. These are real deterrents - too many criminals walk the street because no body is prepared to stand witness against them. They also know how easily people are intimidated - they fear little from the general public - and without evidence and witnesses the Police find it hard to get a prosecution against them. They the get a community order, a slap on the wrist or a fine they fund by committing more crime. It is our society ? and it is we who determine what it is by our own actions, or inactions.

The usual reason people get away with anti-social behaviour is that they expect no one to challenge them. If you actually do say something, they almost always back down. The classic examples are the surly adolescents playing music on their mobile phones on buses and trains. Most people let it go, but I don't, and not once has anyone ever refused my polite request - although it's rarely done with good grace. Most young people will respond to adults as having authority and do as they're told - I wish more people would remember that and not assume every kid in South London will knife any adult that so much as looks at him the wrong way.


Having said that, you have to judge each situation on its merits - if I thought someone was actually looking for a fight, or was obviously mentally ill, then as long as it was doing no one any real harm, I would be more inclined to let it go. There does seem to me to be a slight excess of testosterone in some of the posts above - if you are going to intervene it should be with the intention of calming the situation down rather than ratcheting up the likelihood of a fight.


I have never had to respond to someone being attacked or similar - I hope I would intervene in some way. If someone else is in physical danger and you are able to do something about it then it must be your moral imperative to intervene - I don't think we should ever lose that.

  • 3 weeks later...

Im very torn on this issue.. My instinct is to intervene to either stop a behaviour of a person that is unnaceptable (i.e. small things queue jumping, foul language etc) but then I have been in circumstances where Ive been on a bus and its properly kicked off and Ive not gotten involved for fear I would get my head kicked in... The times when I dont intervene though Im always very upset with myself afterwards as I think there are far too many people in London (not necessarily not anywhere else in the world but we are only talking london) who think they can be rude, bully people, break the rules, disrepect others and get away with it because there is an air amongst most people that they will just ignore it as are too afraid to get involved.. When I see it and am part of it it makes me livid!


I was once on a bus where two men (drunk) were picking on a young man who it seemed (and dont quote me) had some kind of turrets as the more stressed he got the worse his ticks etc were and it broke my heart but the drunk men were very aggessive and I selfishly didnt want them to turn on me so I kept quiet.. I think about that often..

  • 3 months later...

Obviously I have always intervened even before joining my current profession. I am proud that so many of you feel the same way that we must stand up for our fellow man.


I would like to stress however that I would say that rather than get physically involved you can always (apart from on the tube) get on your mobile phone descreatly and call the police. Identifying yourself as a witness when the police arrive and tell them what you have witnessed.


Instinct and red mist will kick in when we see some crimes but if they turn on you, step back, get some space and when able call the police. Dont get into a stand up fight.

I'm guessing not right


Even Cameron couched his statement yesterday in "these things get misreported" terms, and the police have issued a formal denial. When initially quoted as well, Klass had said how helpful the police were. I'm sure SOMETHING about the knife was said, after which the wearily predictable wailing ensued


Storm in a tea cup basically, nothing to see here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...