Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There is no way forward for civilisation as we know it. We are just marking time before a transition to a completely different world with a much lower population. We might be able to influence whether the transition is smooth and controlled rather than violent and catastrophic, but that is all. IMHO.

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Karl Marx said many years ago capitalism only

> works in an expanding economy but will not sustain

> itself during imploding years.


Not quite the exact wording, SteveT, but I'd concur with the sentiment nonetheless.


With respect to the title of the original posting, I believe that there are candidates-a-plenty.


Take a look at the writings of Antonio Negri (a particularly interesting essay in Radical Philosophy a few months ago which addressed the issue of Keynes.); Michael Hardt; Franco Berardi and Sylvere Lotringer, to name but a few.


Contemporary political philosophers are attempting to get to get to grips with this current phase of capitalist implosion, but you've got to seek them out!


http://www.generation-online.org


http://www.semiotexte.com/


http://info.interactivist.net/

reggie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> strange how you are equating thinkers to

> economists

> methinks thinking is on a higher plane than where

> our economy is heading

> just a thought


Try the 'Is there a God' thread. Plenty of thinkers there!

Today's great thinkers include AC Grayling and Richard Dawkins.


Today's politicians won't touch great thinking, even political thinking, with a barge pole. Politicians are in an age where there is so much selfishness ( as a result of a lot of us having lived through GOOD times that we don't want to let go of, and a lot of poverty watching telly seeing what the rest of us have ) yet everything in public life has to be done to committee, not individuals.


I think we will "muddle through" (well put) because we won't all die all at once so there is no option but to muddle through. Something like swine flu or a worse variation popping lots of us off might make a difference, and then the great thinkers will be the white coats working out the antivirals!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...