Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am starting to think about trying for a second baby in the next few months. My company has taken over another company and we are going to be issued with a new contract sometime in Jan 2010. The maternity package at my old company was/is very good, and it enabled me to take far longer off work than I would have been able to otherwise the first time round. I am fairly confident that the new maternity package will not be as good and is more likely to be more like the statutory one. If I already happen to be pregnant when the new contract gets issued does anyone know if I have any leg to stand on if it means me and others like me will be much worse off with the new one or does everyone just have to go along with it ? It has been suggested not signing it but I think by carrying on working you are effectively agreeing to it anyway. If anyone knows anything about this I would really appreciate some advice/thoughts ?

Hi. I'm not a lawyer, but I work in HR. I understand that your work can't just issue you with a new contract unilaterally - this would be a breach of contract. They have to follow the correct processes which generally involve consultation with employee representatives. If they are doing this, you should speak to your employee rep to ensure they represent your views (or volunteer to be a rep yourself). If they are not consulting, I think they will be on pretty dodgy ground legally if you challenged the new contract. Your employer would also need to show that there were strong business/ financial reasons for the change - I would be surprised if maternity pay makes up a significant part of employee costs at your work. You could also raise this point during consultation.


If and when they do issue you with a new contract, you would have the option of formally notifying them that you object to this term in the new contract, and that although you will carry on working, you do not accept this change. Changing employee contracts is a farily complex area so you might want to try and get some legal advice if there's no trade unions/ HR or employee rep's you can speak to at work. I'm afraid I don't know what impact actually being pregnant would have on your rights.

I don't see how your company taking over another justifoies a changeto your contract. Uf it was your company being taken over, TUPE may apply http://www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/emplaw/tupe/tupe.htm?IsSrchRes=1



There are restictions on an employer unilaterally varying a contract (which amending your maternity rights does)


http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=816


I'd suggest speaking to ACAS for advice.

http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1410

This exact same point arose with me in my last job (I am a lawyer, though not an employment law expert). My understanding is that the company cannot unilaterally change your contract. You were employed on the basis of your original contract, which stands unless you both agree to alter it. If you notify your boss that you are not happy to accept the new terms then you are not deemed to have accepted them just because you carry on working.


With my company I raised the point, and in the end they moved me onto the new contract except in relation to the old maternity provisions, which stayed the same. Only those women who specifically asked for this exception got it, the others moved on to completely new terms. The company may not mind making this sort of exception for a few employees, they will still have most employees plus any new ones on the standard contract. I would raise the point with your boss and stand your ground. They aren't able to force you into it very easily.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • William, a farmer, farming with both his parents who are in their 80s, summed up the nonsensical approach the government is taking on farmers on Question Time tonight when he said: "At the point at which inheritance tax becomes due you aren't in a position to pay it without selling an income bearing asset which then destabilises the very entity you have built up to create a profit from". He summed it up beautifully when he closed: "If this policy were to persist it will materially and existentially destabilise our [the county's] farming business " The biggest clap of the programme came from the ex-NFU president who accused the government panelist: "Why aren't you going after the wealthy investors, the private equity businesses that are buying up land, planting trees, offsetting their green conscience. You've done nothing to them. They're the ones driving up land prices. These farmers do not want to sell their asset....they want to invest in it and this is going to stifle investment. Who is going to want to invest in new buildings as that is going to drive up the value of the estate." "You're going after the wrong people". It's amazing that the government have been daft enough to pick a fight with farmers - Alastair Campbell commented that he did react with shock when it was announced in the budget as, he said, you don't start a fight with farmers.
    • Surely you have fantasised about teaching people a lesson.   The potato in the exhaust is a bit of an urban myth, but here is what may happen https://carfromjapan.com/article/car-maintenance/a-potato-is-stuffed-in-a-car-exhaust-pipe/
    • rush to an all night garage and buy a uk sim, simples
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...