Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think you're clutching at straws here Silverfox. Science is a process, it's the activity that humans engaged in that facilitated the rescue.


If they hadn't praised the Lord they'd still have been rescued.


If they hadn't engaged in science they'd still be right where they were, and dead.


I think you should be proud of the baboon analogy Silverfox, as it shows there's hope for you yet.

weirdly, whilst interweb trawling as I see out my days waiting for my redundant life to begin, I found this little gem.

It's a chap selling his own book admittedly, but there are some interesting ideas.


He's basically playing with the idea of 'technology as an autonomous system', bestowing science with the sort of personality that Silverfox seems to be doing.


A couple of his conclusions (or at least playful theories) include:


"Our genes have co-evolved with our inventions. In the past 10,000 years alone, in fact, our genes have evolved 100 times faster than the average rate for the previous 6 million years. This should not be a surprise. As we domesticated the dog (in all its breeds) from wolves and bred cows and corn and more from their unrecognizable ancestors, we, too, have been domesticated. We have domesticated ourselves. Our teeth continue to shrink (because of cooking, our external stomach), our muscles thin out, our hair disappears. Technology has domesticated us. As fast as we remake our tools, we remake ourselves. We are co-evolving with our technology, and so we have become deeply dependent on it. If all technology-every last knife and spear-were to be removed from this planet, our species would not last more than a few months. We are now symbiotic with technology."


"Technologies are like organisms that require a sequence of developments to reach a particular stage. Inventions follow this uniform developmental sequence in every civilization and society, independent of human genius. You can't effectively jump ahead when you want to. But when the web of supporting technological species are in place, an invention will erupt with such urgency that it will occur to many people at once. The progression of inventions is in many ways the march toward forms dictated by physics and chemistry in a sequence determined by the rules of complexity. We might call this technology's imperative."


Slightly bonkers, but interesting. You should have words with him Silverfox, he's teetering on the brink of belief (though possibly of a machine god, the Loa of William Gibson fame perhaps?) I reckon ;-)


http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/004749.php

I can't understand why Hugo and mockney seem unable to grasp Silverfox's point, which I feel is an interesting and valid observation based firmly in the (scientific) realm of behavioural psychology?


Also, the ideas quoted above about technology are very insightful - far from even slightly bonkers, in my view.


I think sometimes your interpretations may be too literal - especially when others are expressing their ideas creatively?

Hal


Are you the doctor in Shutter Island?


I've read silverfox's posts many many times now and I am still no wiser. It is a lesson in obfustication


take the simpler lines


"There's no science involved here. The baboon is using its wits and a tool to achieve an objective. "


using wits and tools IS science.


Maybe I am stupid Hal - but can your summarise the insight here? As far as I can see Huguenot and Mockney have grasped them in their entirety. It feels like Gillian McKeith telling me I don't understand food like she does

I would say that baboons are not capable of applying scientific methodology - their actions (even the use of tools or simple learning abilities) are guided by instinct.


My take on Silverfox's original point: the human will to survive is often inspired by irrational ideas - such as religion. In the case of the Chilean miners that was clearly an important factor in their minds and in those of the local community, some of whom took part in the rescue.


The fact that technology was employed is not in question; it is merely a different facet of the event that is not relevant to this thread.


The study of what makes humans tick, their beliefs, motivations, hopes and fears is grist for the behavioural psychology mill.

Sounds to me like the thinking of someone who believes in the exceptional status of mankind, conferred on us by our loving God perhaps.


We're just primates you know, I'm not sure what the difference is between the baboon's stick and man's flint tools. Especially as it is taught behaviour passed down generations of the troupe making it quite specifically a skill not instinct.


I love your hints that something esoteric transcends the nonsense actually being written down, but yet further lack of clarification only serves to detract from the argument.


I sense in there the idea that it is a divine strength that gives mankind a will to live, and the existence of the will to live is evidence of this. Sounds like begging the question if you ask me.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sounds to me like the thinking of someone who

> believes in the exceptional status of mankind,

> conferred on us by our loving God perhaps.


One of the reasons we are different from other species is our ability to contemplate supernatural forces and deities. In that respect and within the context of this thread, man is exceptional - to the limit of our knowledge.


> We're just primates you know, I'm not sure what

> the difference is between the baboon's stick and

> man's flint tools. Especially as it is taught

> behaviour passed down generations of the troupe

> making it quite specifically a skill not instinct.


Yet all of the evidence suggests that mimicry of tool use by non-humans is an instinctive ability - unless you have scientific evidence to the contrary. Hint - a paper by a scientifically astute baboon would be very helpful here :)


In fact, tool use is not confined to primates: it has been observed in lower mammals and birds. It may be one of the instincts that helped man develop beyond sticks and stones.


The overlap between instinct and intellect goes to the heart of this discussion: we know that survival is a powerful instinct yet we have the ability to rationalise or irrationalise it.


> I love your hints that something esoteric

> transcends the nonsense actually being written

> down, but yet further lack of clarification only

> serves to detract from the argument.


On the contrary, I am merely trying to crystallise the argument for you.


> I sense in there the idea that it is a divine

> strength that gives mankind a will to live, and

> the existence of the will to live is evidence of

> this. Sounds like begging the question if you ask me.


I think I see where you may be failing to comprehend - we are discussing human perceptions here, surely, not the actual intervention of supernatural forces?


Excuse the fisk - it's merely instinctive behaviour on my part.

You are correct Mick Mac. But at least we know that Homer Simpson is a Catholic. One less thing to worry about.





@ Our Esteemed Chair:

I have been chided in the past for quoting Homer Simpson in the Drawing Room. However, this latest news comes from the Vatican's own daily broadsheet. Under the circumstances, I trust you will allow this post to stand.


Forever your obedient(ish) servant.;-)

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In 100 years we will all be dead, most likely!

> What will the point of our existence have been? Is

> there an afterlife? Is there reincarnation? Is

> there a God? Discuss!


No. There isn't one. I just skipped 20 pages but hey, who's counting?


Can we discuss the Diamond Synchrotron now, please?


Edit: in the scheme of ... everything. I forgot that all important r

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > 574 posts and still no answer on the big

> question.

>

> No wonder there isn't when people connect the

> question to religion.


Now you are having a laugh Delan. wtf does that mean ?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Narnia Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Mick Mac Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > 574 posts and still no answer on the big

> > question.

> >

> > No wonder there isn't when people connect the

> > question to religion.

>

> Now you are having a laugh Delan. wtf does that

> mean ?


I leave you to work it out Mick.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...