Jump to content

Recommended Posts

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Y'man Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > HAL9000 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > > Indeed, modern science has identified a

> > > mitochondrial Eve and a Y-Line Adam amongst

> our

> > > genetic ancestors.

>

> > Your source please Hal.

>

> I've added links above that identify the principal

> sources in this field of study.


Wikipedia, Hal? Sorry, that won't cut it. You could have written it.

Y'man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HAL9000 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > I've added links above that identify the principal

> > sources in this field of study.


> Wikipedia, Hal? Sorry, that won't cut it. You

> could have written it.


That is exactly why I made the point that my links "identify the principal sources" - the Wiki pages link through to the original scientific research papers - unless you suspect that I wrote all of them too? Clue: See the footnotes and/or references sections.

"As to whether that is far fetched to you depends on your faith. I find the mathmatical probability of life evolving far- fetched - more chance of me winning the lottery and never buying a ticket (no comments about that please before you all start on me, lol) - so you have to make a personal decision as to what you will believe after a careful search."


I may not have quite got that one. Are you saying the bible is true because it's simply more plausible?


Gosh.


Not sure what people can turn up in a search? I guess people could search their soul, and find it's more convenient to run with the Bible stuff?


That doesn't mean it's true. People choose to believe stuff every day because it's convenient - battered wives and cuckolds. It's not true though.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cripes - is prison that boring? Incest not

> outlawed until time of Moses. See Leviticus.


I just noticed this comment. I've looked through and can find no mention of prison anywhere, to what or whose remark, do you pertain?

Y'man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My apologies, Hal, if I said something to make you

> feel a little threatened, it wasn't intentional.

> Why the flippant remark at the end there?


No apology necessary. If anything it is I who should apologise. I was just trying to reflect the humour in your post. I tend to sound a bit robotic on email - hence my choice of screen name. No offence perceived or intended on my part.

An interesting observation from a Times article cited on another thread:


Followers of Padre Pio believe he exuded "the odour of sanctity", had the gift of bilocation (being in two places at once), healed the sick and could prophesy the future.


The divine gift of bilocation is yet another example of Quantum Mechanics appearing within Judaeo-religious ideas. 'Being in two places at once' describes what scientists today might call a Quantum Superposition!

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You mean you started a controversial thread and

> didn't read it? Isn't that known as flaming? ;-P


Well I don't know about controversial! I have read a good deal of it and posted on occasions too. But there are only two possible answers to the question, yes or no. Of course if you say 'yes' you have to define god for those who don't know god. That's a bit difficult. If there is a god I would suggest he/it is beyond being defined in terms of the limitations of language. A bit like how to describe the taste of an apple for example to someone who has never tasted one.


Not sure what 'flaming' is but please PM me when you've arrived at the answer. I am interested...........honest!

Depends what you mean by the question.


Are you asking: Is the universe somehow more than the sum of its parts? If so does that constitute a god? If so what is a god?


Or are you asking: Is there a big man with a white beard sitting on a cloud who has the pope on speed dial?

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> despite > europe's best minds for a thousand years having

> dedicated their lives to theology and yet still

> came up with many many differences in

> interpretation,


Obviously they were not some of the best minds, lol, otherwise they would have ditched the theology bit.



> You say the bible isn't incomplete and any

> interpetation is only there for those who want to

> twist it's meaning for their own ends, but in the

> following sentence you go on to interpret why

> there is an implicit acceptance of incest until

> Leviticus outlaws it.

> If it wasn't incomplete wouldn't the bible have

> had a few more begats to fill in the gaps and said

> 'yes they were related but I bestowed them with

> genetic diversity, and once there were enough of

> you I stopped interfering and made incest rather

> unhealthy to your genetic disposition'?

>

> I can't find those bits in the complete bible,

> clearly I don't understand it ;)


Wasn't 'Adam had sons and daughters' enough to complete the picture? I meant it's complete in the sense it gives you what you need to know, not that it spells out everything in out child friendly format.



P.S I do agree with you that the mitochondrial DNA in itself is not conclusive evidence of an Adam and Eve, although it does at the very least support the account.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "As to whether that is far fetched to you depends

> on your faith. I find the mathmatical probability

> of life evolving far- fetched - more chance of me

> winning the lottery and never buying a ticket (no

> comments about that please before you all start on

> me, lol) - so you have to make a personal decision

> as to what you will believe after a careful

> search."

>

> I may not have quite got that one. Are you saying

> the bible is true because it's simply more

> plausible?


No. I'm saying that the mathematical probability of life evolving by chance is far-fetched compared to life having a powerful designer. (I thought I said no comments on this).


> Not sure what people can turn up in a search? I

> guess people could search their soul, and find

> it's more convenient to run with the Bible stuff?


Trust me. It is never more convenient to run with the bible stuff.

> That doesn't mean it's true.

No it doesn't. But I know which horse I'll back with the same odds.


People choose to

> believe stuff every day because it's convenient -

> battered wives and cuckolds. It's not true though.


What like evolution?

I've never heard anything so ridiculous as someone saying something spectacularly contentious and then forbidding comments on it. What on earth gave you the right to dictate what people could or couldn't comment on? I take it you were joking.


Let me rephrase to again request your clarity - you called evolution far-fetched by comparison with God.


If you're struggling with definitions, let me enlighten you: far-fetched means "unconvincing, unlikely, strained, fantastic, incredible, doubtful, unbelievable, dubious, unrealistic, improbable, unnatural, preposterous, implausible"


And the antonyms (for comparison - and of course by implication your characterisation of God) are: "possible, likely, reasonable, acceptable, realistic, authentic, credible, probable, plausible, feasible, imaginable, believable"


Do I understand you're backing 'God' based on the odds? You don't have to work the odds on evolution, you can watch it in action.


If long-term scales are making you confused, you can just as easily make short term observations of disease resistant bacteria or fruit flies. Unlike God in action, which is a matter of faith.


Or do you simply close your eyes when presented with immutable facts, hug your rosary, and plead to the heavens to rid you of Satan's work?


(light hearted musing... or are you just a troll?)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...