Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Shorty (cool if I call you that?) and Marmorma Man I like your mention of NOTABLE famous people which is something lacking in earlier threads dominated by an incomprehensible Heat magazine style fascination with the two bit actors, DJ's and reality TV goons that rate as important in our world today.

That Macroban thread threw up within its discussion the following:


Enid Blyton, R V Davies, Charles Dickens, CS Forrester, Boris Karloff, Gustav Holst, Lord Haw Haw, Oscar Wilde, Ernest Shackleton, Peter Cushing, PG Wodehouse, Bob Monkhouse, Raymond Chandler, Lord Byron, Charles Barry, Edward Alleyn, Michael Faraday, Henry Bessemer, Camille Pissaro, Margaret Thatcher.


Perhaps you were hoping for a far bigger haul of worthy names, Macroban? (ComputedShorty has added Mrs P and Anne Shelton) but that thread is hardly evidence that you "tried" and failed to get the "celebrity worship generation" interested in the history of this area.

Three post mentalism but what the hell.


Both computedshorty's threads have the air of someone who has decided that the posters of this Forum need some reminding, or education, of the local history of the area - and he's going to give it to them. Indeed in a commment in the About This Forum CS said: This is just a thought that might give your younger members as insight that they don't seem to have on what happened where they live now.


Yet threads on the past, and on local history, are always welcomed and well-supported on here.

1 We have had several on the war time history of the area - and they prove that people are not only interested, but often already well-informed.

2 This Forum was, as far as I'm aware, a crucial tool in asking for and organising the renovation of the war memorial at the bottom of Lordship Lane.

3 The 1950s Rodwell Road thread was loved by many for the insights into local life at the time, and drew a wide response.

4. Even small threads asking for information on bottle factories, etc, get good replies.


So, my beef is that CS had no grounds to make that comment, as it assumes a level of ignorance that is not supported by the activity and posts on this Forum.


And neither do you, Macroban, have any grounds for your continued generational antagonism.

I don't know what the problem is, I've been reading some of Shorty's stuff from the V1 V2 thread and have found it intersting. As much as I'm sure there are plenty of sources of local history I don't see how someone who has watched the neighborhood change over 60 years and would like to share his memories is hurting anybody. Who has the right to decide what is a valid topic? If nobody reads it it goes away.


Pettiness is what makes this forum dull.

I've been reading some of Shorty's stuff from the V1 V2 thread and have found it intersting. As much as I'm sure there are plenty of sources of local history I don't see how someone who has watched the neighborhood change over 60 years and would like to share his memories is hurting anybody. Who has the right to decide what is a valid topic? If nobody reads it it goes away.


I don't disagree with any of that. I'm not looking to proscribe a thread or decide on validity, or be petty. Merely to put CS' comments into the context of the Forum as a whole. It was the comment in the About this Forum thread, plus CS's own snippy comments about people going off topic that got to me.


Add to that Macroban's usual "carefully considered "witty" responses" and I was moved to comment further, to provide some balance.

"Who has the right to decide what is a valid topic? "


Well that depends on what is meant as valid - is someone trying to invalidate the thread? I don't think so


If a thread is over repetitive because someone can't be fagged to do a search, or at least differentiate it, then surely it is reasonable for someone to point this out? They haven't demanded any punishment or said the topic isn't of interest to anyone. So in that sense I would say no-one is saying the thread is invalid


They might be saying it's unnecessary because it already exists - which again seems reasonable to me, as they linked to teh previous iterations - look a whole welter of info on tap already! Let's start with that and see if we can add to it, rather than re-invent the wheel?

That is not counting the ones that tell you what you cant do,


Who has told you what you can't do?


Please understand, my very point is that people are interested, and have been for a long time, as evidenced by all the other threads that we have had on these topics. There's nothing wrong with a new thread on the topic, either.


What got to me was the "here's some information your younger readers seem not to be aware of" attitude.

I usually agree with you Sean but not this time.

What bores the pants off me is people ruining an interesting thread by inserting into it a whole load of posts that start a big discussion about whether we should be having the thread at all. If you don't like the thread, leave it alone dont try to spoil it. This is what bullies do. If they don't like what someone else is talking about it they interject their viewpoint into a thread or say "you are new, I'll tell you what you can or can't do"


"They might be saying it's unnecessary because it already exists"

Yes, that is exactly what they are saying, but who are they to say that it is unnecessary.

This is like saying that anything that is entertaining or interesting shouldn't be done because it has been done before.

Why not tell the BBC to stop showing the news because they had similar stories on yesterday.

And just because something is unnecessary for one user, it might not be unnecessary for one of the several thousand other EDF users. As I said on a previous post - if you don't like the channel, change over.


New thread just started on whether repetition should be allowed on the EDF.



SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Who has the right to decide what is a valid

> topic? "

>

> Well that depends on what is meant as valid - is

> someone trying to invalidate the thread? I don't

> think so

>

> If a thread is over repetitive because someone

> can't be fagged to do a search, or at least

> differentiate it, then surely it is reasonable for

> someone to point this out? They haven't demanded

> any punishment or said the topic isn't of interest

> to anyone. So in that sense I would say no-one is

> saying the thread is invalid

>

> They might be saying it's unnecessary because it

> already exists - which again seems reasonable to

> me, as they linked to teh previous iterations -

> look a whole welter of info on tap already! Let's

> start with that and see if we can add to it,

> rather than re-invent the wheel?

Assuming the E in 'Famous people of E.Dulwich' stands for Emmerdale and that Dulwich is backward for Farm then I'd still have to say No! It might suprise people but I walked past the GMTV Doctor the other day on Lordship Lane and lo and behold she was not submerged by autograph hunters which either means no EDF hardliners were about or in reality is not at all Famous in the sense of which Shorty intended with his OP.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...