Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Am I the only one wondering whether Woof may be reading his own posts this morning and blushing?



No. I can't decide which is funnier. Ted's thread (*raises imaginary glass to Ted*) or Woof's fantastically outraged response.


Always interesting how posters evolve on the EDF. Woof has tranformed from a man who woofed annoyingly in every post and was prone to spamming entire pages with nonsense responses to every thread, to an concerned parent, blinded by righteous indignation to the possiblity of, dare I say it, a spoof*.


*Disclaimer: I am *whispers* not a parent so nothing I say counts at all ;-)

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only one wondering whether Woof may be

> reading his own posts this morning and blushing?



---------------------------------------------------


Oh now I remember( having looked in the re-cycle bin) that Wisky & wine dont mix



Mmmmmm

I just thought I'd point out how lucky Ted is that there are some more intelligent members of the clique than Woof who've seen this as a good laugh on Ted's part. If I'd started a thread like this I'd have been pilloried and be subject to some very caustic comments. Count yourself lucky Ted.


This thread has also thrown up an entirely different subject altogether.


"Parents in my country give the young people options"


Well, it seems that Ted has been masquarading as an Englishman where in actual fact he's a johnny foreigner!


So ladies and gentlemen...from where does our rib tickler hail from?


I believe at some point he said he's a Scotch-English hybrid but I'm not sure. If the child of a Scotsman was acting up in this manner it would be beaten black and blue and then be offered up as some kind of Pagan sacrifice to their painted gods.


Ted does seem to be acting with a degree of rational which inclines me to believe that some part of his bloodline is indeed of English stock.


So, where does he come from?


P.s You better not be French Ted!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...