Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Shame when an interesting argument / debate, about the rights of photographers vs the rights of hysterical parents who read the News of the World too much, becomes a slagging match.


Would everyone involved in the slagging match please back down for the sake of those who were enjoying this thread!

Keep it interesting.

But Domitianus - I fear you're getting your misanthrope mixed up with your misogynist


A misanthrope dislikes man (i.e. human) kind in general, a misogynist holds women alone in disdain. So a misanthrope hates almost twice as many people as a misogynist.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But Domitianus - I fear you're getting your

> misanthrope mixed up with your misogynist

>

> A misanthrope dislikes man (i.e. human) kind in

> general, a misogynist holds women alone in

> disdain. So a misanthrope hates almost twice as

> many people as a misogynist.



Indeed, Penguin68. And SeanMacGabhann,I'm sure did mean misanthropic, but Domitianus refuted this specifically in relation to female gender. But I do not want to misinterpret his post and so, in the spirit of comments on this thread, I seek clarification.

LuLu Too Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Penguin68 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > But Domitianus - I fear you're getting your

> > misanthrope mixed up with your misogynist

> >

> > A misanthrope dislikes man (i.e. human) kind in

> > general, a misogynist holds women alone in

> > disdain. So a misanthrope hates almost twice as

> > many people as a misogynist.

>

>

> Indeed, Penguin68. And SeanMacGabhann,I'm sure did

> mean misanthropic, but Domitianus refuted this

> specifically in relation to female gender. But I

> do not want to misinterpret his post and so, in

> the spirit of comments on this thread, I seek

> clarification.



You are quite correct. I had confused the two terms.

do any of you guys read private eye? there's this spoof section about internet forums. sadly, it's not a spoof here is it? if you don't read it check it out.


isn't it time someone in admin reminded everyone to stay on topic:


hysterical photographers vs hysterical parents...

What if you spotted a woman in her 60s taking secret photos of two white young teenagers stabbing a bin with what turned out not to be large knives, but were in fact broken garden shears, and both boys turned out to be called Nigel and both wanted to be bus drivers when they grew up? If you called the police, who would you report and for what crime?

I made a video clip of some dulwich kids dancing and clapping along to Sly and Reggie and was about to post it on our tube channel.

I was told by several, even by the happy go lucky Sly that this broke some sad unwritten law.

The results of this are the restriction of spreading an important idea that people including kids can enjoy themselves

on the street, innocent fun...music...dancing..joining in with spontaneous events.

Dont Worry Dulwich

LuLu Too Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whilst out running this morning, in Dulwich Park,

> I saw a lone man with a large camera. And he had a

> dog.

> Perhaps the good Burghers of ED ought to know.

> Should I start a thread about this?



Mmmmm, burgers.


I had a lovely burger at Brockwell Lido today.


Then I took some photos of my friend's son.


(Just declaring an interest - my friend is the owner of the new Lido cafe)

  • 1 month later...
In my view any decent photographer will ask permission before taking pictures of anyone else. If someone started snapping picutres of me randomly I'd certainly have something to say about it, and this should be no different for a child. Regardless of intent (although I would perhaps fleetingly think the worst)I would not let a stranger take photos of my child.
  • 4 weeks later...
Man I can't believe this discussion. If you believe someone's behaviour is unacceptable, turn around and confront them directly rather than hollering for the boys in blue. You might have an interesting discussion with someone who's been taking pictures all their life as a hobby or a profession, you might even learn about shooting from the hip. How unfortunate to grow old and therefore become suspect. People are so suspicious of photographers these days it's hard to take a natural reportage photograph Look back at the work of Bert Hardycould be interpreted as suspect gosh young boys fighting with no shirts on. Bert Hardy took fantastic pictures of ordinary people on the streets that remind us of a bygone era, when a child in trouble could turn to an adult and ask for help, instead of fearing the worst. How often i've heard kids say 'are you a paedo or something' to any adult trying to be human around them. Oh it's a mad mad world.

I think that the mother concerned with the well being of her child is ABSOLOUTLEY NATURAL and ABSOLOUTLEY RIGHT!


If someone is surreptitously taking photos of your child you have every right to be protectitive and to say that that person is stirring up social hysteria. ( Well done - let's generate more pointless hysteria.) is frankly the view of an idiot.Who's to say that the person was involved in an innocent act?? Surely if someone wants to take photos of your children then the responsible thing to do is ask your permission first or let you know afterwards and offer you either A ) a copy of the pics in question or B ) the opportunity to delete the photos if you are not happy with the situation, there by avoiding the possibility of causing hysteria? What if he was a peadophile, and the actions of Becky had him busted and prevented more children being abused? Would you have ignored his action Marmora if they had been you kids or grandkids??


As a man I would have done exactly the same or something far less reasonable and responsible and challenged him directly to his face. As a woman out with her children Becky did exactly the best thing she could of done and any suggestion otherwise is ridiculous and insane.


Child Protection is themost important thing in this case and screw the rights of the reportage artist or anyone who is stupid enough to think it was a good thing to do with the camera. If they are innocent then the embarrassment will last an Hour or two. If they are guilty of more then the affects can last a lifetime to a child.


WELL DONE BECKY!

Child Protection and Terrorism are the two scourges of modern society. Not because they are particularly dangerous, but that they are used for people to hang their neuroses upon and for governments to enact more and more legislation that kills freedom.


Iaineasy takes the dreadful (and discredited) 'if it saves one child' argument. Unfortunately this is doing more harm than good to children. It's this argument that has bought us the scourge of the Independent Safeguarding Authority (aka the Gossip Database). It's this that is killing junior sport, scouts, and other good healthy things that children can do. Instead we have a plague of child obesity - figures out yesterday show that 36 per cent of 10 and 11 year old children in London are overweight or obese. 36 PERCENT!! A good proportion of these children are going to have severe health issues and die early.


This will only get worse because the paranoia will continue and there will be less and less people willing to open themselves up to the danger of working with children.


Yes, Iaineasy, the hysteria of you and people like you may save one child. But at the cost of the future of many overweight, unhappy children.


Well done you.

what has child obesity got to do with a man acting suspiciously with a camera, this wasn,t a sports event was it? And how is a mother acting in defence of her child paranoia, Im not against freedom of any sort, and I am very pro-using a camera with respect! And I am certainly not hysterical in supporting becky.

Not one bit of your statement makes any sense to me or has anything to do with what I said above.


If you want to rant about the goverment and terrorist laws on a thread that has to do with a mum looking after her child and warning other parents who may feel the same about it, go ahead Loz what ever makes You feel better is fine with me, as is whatever makes Becky feel better about protecting her family.


I wander what the view of the local neighborhood policing team.



I think they would agree with her actions

now I'll let you get on with it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...