?Rob da Bank? ? robbed of imagination?

[kanga]

So Rob da Bank says in one of this evening?s freesheets that he likes living in East Dulwich as there are ?not too many suits?.

Judging someone by their occupation (or dress for that matter) is lazy social shorthand at best, and more likely just plain prejudice (Occupationalism? Dressism?)

So piss off, you crusty. I?m tired of seeing you in that stinky rainbow-striped sweater every time you manage to claw a few inches in the press. Those ?suits? are probably the very same demographic that are tuned in to your middle-of-the-road choonz, man.

And while I?m at it, what a banal, idiotic choice of pseudonym. Let?s hope your kids don?t inherit your narrow-mindedness and lack of imagination.

Rant over.

[Horsebox]

Didn't know he was local. I wonder if he'll give me a lift to Bestival this year? Also, any chance of a free programme? I thought charging ?5 for them was a pisstake at least, after the not so cheap ticket price and the rain. Can't you do anything about the rain, rob?

[red devil]

http://www.residentadvisor.net/images/profiles/robdabank.jpg 'ave it...

[woofmarkthedog]

Oh, god I have sooo nearly ran him over before.

W**F

*turns up turbo boost*

[Horsebox]

Were you aiming for 'da bank or was it a chance meeting?

[Mick Mac]

thats a funny name. How we laugh every time we hear it.

[Mark]

Let me guess kanga, you wear a suit? In fact, are you a suit? And he said he liked it because "There are not too many suits", not because "There are not any suits" there's subtle difference.

And having a go at someone (who you have to admit is pretty good and successful even without a suit) because of their name is rather stupid. I'm going out on a limb here, are you an estate agent?

[Santerme]

Never heard of him!

[Peckhamgatecrasher]

Ditto!

[bigbadwolf]

I think Kanga is David 'ram jam' Rodigan.

[Mick Mac]

even i have heard of him. But did not know what he did. Good that he is local. I agree ed does not have many suits. I have to wear one but im glad most people here do not have to otherwise ed would prob not have the the character it has. So i agree with rob da banker.

[TillieTrotter]

Rodigan is far to kool for that BBW.

[silverfox]

Who he? Could do with a good scrub and a shave

[bigbadwolf]

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rodigan is far to kool for that BBW.

Judge for yourself.

Bit embarrassing if you ask me.

[TillieTrotter]

He might look abit too old for skanking these days but noone spins em like Rodigan.

[bigbadwolf]

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He might look abit too old for skanking these days

Is that what they call it.

To me it looks like someone slipped something into his cocoa, daft codger.

[flapjackdavey]

kanga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So Rob da Bank says in one of this evening?s

> freesheets that he likes living in East Dulwich as

> there are ?not too many suits?.

>

> Judging someone by their occupation (or dress for

> that matter) is lazy social shorthand at best, and

> more likely just plain prejudice (Occupationalism?

> Dressism?)

>

> So piss off, you crusty. I?m tired of seeing you

> in that stinky rainbow-striped sweater every time

> you manage to claw a few inches in the press.

> Those ?suits? are probably the very same

> demographic that are tuned in to your

> middle-of-the-road choonz, man.

>

> And while I?m at it, what a banal, idiotic choice

> of pseudonym. Let?s hope your kids don?t inherit

> your narrow-mindedness and lack of imagination.

>

> Rant over.

" so piss off you crusty " isnt lazy social shorhand ? , leave the guy alone .

[flapjackdavey]

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let me guess kanga, you wear a suit? In fact, are

> you a suit? And he said he liked it because "There

> are not too many suits", not because "There are

> not any suits" there's subtle difference.

>

> And having a go at someone (who you have to admit

> is pretty good and successful even without a suit)

> because of their name is rather stupid. I'm going

> out on a limb here, are you an estate agent?

excellent :)-D

[Santerme]

flapjackdavey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> kanga Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So Rob da Bank says in one of this evening?s

> > freesheets that he likes living in East Dulwich

> as

> > there are ?not too many suits?.

> >

> > Judging someone by their occupation (or dress

> for

> > that matter) is lazy social shorthand at best,

> and

> > more likely just plain prejudice

> (Occupationalism?

> > Dressism?)

> >

> > So piss off, you crusty. I?m tired of seeing

> you

> > in that stinky rainbow-striped sweater every

> time

> > you manage to claw a few inches in the press.

> > Those ?suits? are probably the very same

> > demographic that are tuned in to your

> > middle-of-the-road choonz, man.

> >

> > And while I?m at it, what a banal, idiotic

> choice

> > of pseudonym. Let?s hope your kids don?t

> inherit

> > your narrow-mindedness and lack of imagination.

> >

> > Rant over.

>

>

> " so piss off you crusty " isnt lazy social

> shorhand ? .... who the hell are you anyway ? ,

> leave the guy alone .

Four edits?

[flapjackdavey]

Santerme Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> flapjackdavey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > kanga Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > So Rob da Bank says in one of this evening?s

> > > freesheets that he likes living in East

> Dulwich

> > as

> > > there are ?not too many suits?.

> > >

> > > Judging someone by their occupation (or dress

> > for

> > > that matter) is lazy social shorthand at

> best,

> > and

> > > more likely just plain prejudice

> > (Occupationalism?

> > > Dressism?)

> > >

> > > So piss off, you crusty. I?m tired of seeing

> > you

> > > in that stinky rainbow-striped sweater every

> > time

> > > you manage to claw a few inches in the press.

> > > Those ?suits? are probably the very same

> > > demographic that are tuned in to your

> > > middle-of-the-road choonz, man.

> > >

> > > And while I?m at it, what a banal, idiotic

> > choice

> > > of pseudonym. Let?s hope your kids don?t

> > inherit

> > > your narrow-mindedness and lack of

> imagination.

> > >

> > > Rant over.

> >

> >

> > " so piss off you crusty " isnt lazy social

> > shorhand ? .... who the hell are you anyway ? ,

> > leave the guy alone .

>

>

> Four edits?

yep

[Keef]

  Quote

Let me guess kanga, you wear a suit? In fact, are you a suit? And he said he liked it because "There are not too many suits", not because "There are not any suits" there's subtle difference.

And having a go at someone (who you have to admit is pretty good and successful even without a suit) because of their name is rather stupid. I'm going out on a limb here, are you an estate agent?

Bit harsh for you Mark, is Rob your mate or something?

Personally, I'm with Kanga, I think he looks and sounds like the son of

, the mockney tw@t!

[*Bob*]

If I walk into a pub populated by people in suits, I try to get out as quickly as possibly.

Nothing personal about the people in the suits individually, but suits en masse = a load of people tenuously connected by a workplace they despise, feeling obliged to go out for a drink with colleagues in order to drone on about what happened in the office that week and perhaps try to get off with someone which undoubtedly they will come to regret come Monday morning.

[Fear 'n boozin]

I'd like to think that I'd walk out of a pub full of suited types too, but then I'm thinking that'd be a pub in the city, and I wouldn't bother going there anyway. I'd also like to think I'd walk out of a pub full of people with names like Rob the Bank, let's call it the Bishop.

Lol keif.

[Brendan]

kanga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ... plain prejudice (Occupationalism?

> Dressism?)

>

> So piss off, you crusty...

HUMAN BEING IN INABILITY TO RECOGNISE THE BLATANT CONTRADICTORY NATURE OF THEIR OWN ARGUMENT - SHOCKER!

Edit: For our good and the good of all his church.

[LegalEagle-ish]

If I walked into a pub fill of suits I'd run away too - but as I have to wear a suit for work, would that leave me on my own?