Jump to content

Deeds/Land Registry Advice


Tlkamk

Recommended Posts

Can anybody advise or let me have their thoughts regarding the following - my mum owns her home outright freehold, it says on the deeds when purchased that it is a 2 bed house, however a stud wall partition was added in the large master bedroom to divide it in to 2 smaller bedrooms making it a 3 bedroom property. Planning permission wasn't obtained as it was an internal change, is this correct? How would my mum go about changing the deeds to show it as a 3 bed if she wished to sell? Any advice or who to contact for the first step would be gratefully accepted. Thank you in advance.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/70355-deedsland-registry-advice/
Share on other sites

I'm in the middle of a flat sale and the ground plans do not correspond to the current layout of the flats in the building. This has had no relevance to the buyers, surveyors or mortgage offer.


Even the removal of a wall that required building regulation approval (which had been correctly applied for and executed, but Southwark has not managed to come up with the paperwork after 3 months) was not a problem as an indemnity policy was purchased for the buyers protection (one off payment of ?190).


If you haven't got a copy of the title documents you can purchase them from the Land Registry and scan the plan then draw the new wall in on your scanned and printed plan. Your solicitor will then forward the new layout to the buyer for their registration with the rest of the deeds.


But it would seem that you needn't bother to do this unless it is requested.


Of course this is just my experience. A solicitor would advise you on this, but I don't think you need worry about it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...