Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Even if he goes full term, they will have to elect a new leader before the election. Voters will want to know who they are voting for.


I'm not suprised young people are pro Corbyn. Cameron has nothing but more debt and even more unnaffordable housing in store for them. And the other Labour leader contenders are no better.

The re-introduction of clause four is a bit worrying for me. Perhaps in practise Corbyn just envisages renationalistion of key infrastructure rather than moving towards socialism proper, but it certainly isn't something I'd want in the manifesto of any British government.


Could a Corbyn victory help to revitalise the Lib Dems?

That's exactly it Jeremy. He IS referring to key infrastructure, because we subsidise the private corporations our key infrastructure belongs to, to the tune of billions each year, whilst they happily make profits. One of our big six energy compainies is EDF which is a STATE owned utility company of France. Imagine that! A state owned company that trades globally making profit for it's own state. This idea that nationalised business can't be part of the free market and make healthy profit is nonsense.


What Corbyn is talking about is nothing like the post war nationalisation of industry and infrastructure (controlled more by unions than management at times). And there is a growing appetite for it, particulalrly amongst the young, who just see the cost of living spiralling out of their means and fail to understand why we are buying energy from a state owned company whilst having sold off all ours. Something fundamental HAS to change. I'm not sure Corbyn is the man to deliver it, but he'll certainly bring a whole slate of considerations back to the public consciousness.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> One of our big six energy

> compainies is EDF which is a STATE owned utility

> company of France. Imagine that! A state owned

> company that trades globally making profit for

> it's own state. This idea that nationalised

> business can't be part of the free market and make

> healthy profit is nonsense.


Doesn't a lot of that profit come from nuclear produced energy? Something I imagine that doesn't sit comfortably with Corbyn and young idealistic voters...

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > Could a Corbyn victory help to revitalise the

> Lib

> > Dems?

>

>

> I was wondering the same thing. Could imagine some

> Labour guys switching teams.



The Blairites seem to see a war coming (rather ironically)


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/11794595/Tom-Watson-Tony-Blairs-assassin-can-save-Labour-from-Jeremy-Corbyn.html

It doesn't matter how the French produce energy, the fact still remains that a state owned energy comapny can trade internationally as part of the global free market and make good profit.


I don't think for one minute that Corbyn will mean a huge enough swing to Lib dems to revitalise them. Corbyn may mean a slift shift in the type of people that support Labour, but they need that anyway after the shift away from them to the SNP and UKIP.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It doesn't matter how the French produce energy,

> the fact still remains that a state owned energy

> comapny can trade internationally as part of the

> global free market and make good profit.


Spoken like a true Capitalist :)

Of course it matters. I know, let's have a state owned company that makes profit on the back of Far East sweatshops too...

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One of our big six energy compainies is EDF which is a STATE owned utility company of France.

> Imagine that! A state owned company that trades globally making profit for it's own state.


A slight point of order in that 15% of the EDF parent company is privately owned.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > Could a Corbyn victory help to revitalise the Lib Dems?

>

>

> I was wondering the same thing. Could imagine some Labour guys switching teams.


I thought that as well. I can see the Blairites and other centre-lefters merging with the Lib Dems.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good old idealism...

>

> http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2015/07/i

> dealists-tend-to-cause-far-more-misery-to-humanity

> -than-cynics/


"People who think they?re good and that they can make the world a better place end up doing much more damage,"


Spot on description of T Blair.

It is hilarious watching London lefties trying to persuade themselves that the General Election we had just a few weeks ago didn't really happen, and that there are 'huge swathes' of voters dying for a proper socialist party leader to vote for. And talk of 'establishment coups'. Priceless.


Can I give everybody a quick reality check. Outside London, Labour took precisely one seat from the Tories in the whole of the South of England. And that was in Hove, which is as close to a 'London' seat outside the city itself as you can get. And Labour lost zero seats to UKIP, even indirectly. If the Labour Party has any aspirations to govern again, they need to throw Corbyn under the proverbial bus. Today.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Spoken like a true Capitalist :)

> Of course it matters. I know, let's have a state

> owned company that makes profit on the back of Far

> East sweatshops too...


What sweatshops have to do with state owned utility companies I do not know. But seeing as plenty of private market corporations seem to get away with that then another defence of the poor ethics of the free market perhaps?


We have an education and health system that are both state funded, so that EVERYONE can have access to education and good helathcare. And we have that within a global capitalist free market economy....shock horror! A healthy economy can be a healthy mix of ideas from several 'isms'. It doesn't have to be one or the other.


These things are not about capitalism over socilaism (or vice versa), they are about recognising what is important for the mass and about also recognising that some things have to be people before profit and not the other way round. Need I remind anyone that the energy compnaies are under investigation for price fixing?


I really don't understand anyone who uses socialiam, or the left, as some slur. You went to school didn't you? You've had to use the NHS at times haven't you? These things didn't exist at one time. And the outcome was awful.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blah Blah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > One of our big six energy compainies is EDF

> which is a STATE owned utility company of France.

>

> > Imagine that! A state owned company that trades

> globally making profit for it's own state.

>

> A slight point of order in that 15% of the EDF

> parent company is privately owned.


Haven't read the thread but by heck I didn't realise the forum was so big.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Blah Blah Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > One of our big six energy compainies is EDF

> > which is a STATE owned utility company of

> France.

> >

> > > Imagine that! A state owned company that

> trades

> > globally making profit for it's own state.

> >

> > A slight point of order in that 15% of the EDF

> > parent company is privately owned.

>

> Haven't read the thread but by heck I didn't

> realise the forum was so big.


...or owned mostly by the French, for that matter!

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> What sweatshops have to do with state owned

> utility companies I do not know. But seeing as

> plenty of private market corporations seem to get

> away with that then another defence of the poor

> ethics of the free market perhaps?

>

> We have an education and health system that are

> both state funded, so that EVERYONE can have

> access to education and good helathcare. And we

> have that within a global capitalist free market

> economy....shock horror! A healthy economy can be

> a healthy mix of ideas from several 'isms'. It

> doesn't have to be one or the other.

>

> These things are not about capitalism over

> socilaism (or vice versa), they are about

> recognising what is important for the mass and

> about also recognising that some things have to be

> people before profit and not the other way round.

> Need I remind anyone that the energy compnaies are

> under investigation for price fixing?

>

> I really don't understand anyone who uses

> socialiam, or the left, as some slur. You went to

> school didn't you? You've had to use the NHS at

> times haven't you? These things didn't exist at

> one time. And the outcome was awful.



Very good, but none of this explains your earlier statement that it doesn't matter how a state owned company like EDF makes it's profit. I reckon to Corbyn and to large number of his likely voters it does, as it would if it was found out that sweatshops were part of the manufacturing/production chain of state run company, as it would if it was found out a state owned company was dealing in illegal arms, etc etc...

JC used to be my MP when I lived north of the river, and he was exactly what you want as a local representative; he was a visible presence in the community and genuinely cared about local issues but not so insular as to be unaware of worldwide issues. A good combination to be PM?? The idea of a corbyn government increasing poverty and unemployment is ludicrous. He IS a socialist.
There is a lot of nonsense being talked about Corbyn. The fact that his ideas are considered to be somehow extreme, just demonstrates the degree to which the current political discourse has become nothing more than an echo chamber, for a few identikit timid careerists.

"The fact that his ideas are considered to be somehow extreme....."


by 90% of the electorate


"just demonstrates the degree to which the current political discourse...."


on this thread


"has become nothing more than...."


the vain howling into the wind of the post-Blair frustrated pseudo socialists who are largely insulated from the real economic challenges facing the country and many of its people.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
    • Avoid any 2nd hand vehicle with the Ford petrol 1.0 Ecoboost engine and the Petrol 1.2 PureTech engine that can be found in Peugeot, Citroen, Vauxhall.... (you need to mention price for advice)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...