Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I need to vent. Why is it that people won't use the top deck of the bus? I had to force my way on to the bus today and push my way to the stairs. Got to the top deck and it was half empty. Getting off, again, I had to force my way to the exit. Why don't people fill up the seats before blocking all the isles, entrances and exits? People weren't able to board a half empty bus.


You might assume that people just haven't realised that there is space upstairs. However, this morning the driver wouldn't leave a stop because people weren't moving down to clear the doors. Then someone near the stairs shouted, 'there are seats upstairs'. I looked at them. blinked. Said, "sorry?" Then someone else (also between the entrance and the stairs) said "there are seats upstairs if you want to climb up there". I wasn't sure what to do.


So after a brief hesitation I pushed my way through to the stairs and up to a half empty top deck. People were just standing there. Any one of them could have just moved up themselves, but no, they would rather block the way on and off the bus and leave it to others to push past them.


I genuinely don't know what to make of it.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/69324-top-deck-of-bus/
Share on other sites

My wife dislikes the top deck because of the stairs. She finds them fine to go up, but too steep and dangerous when coming down. Could that be a reason? I can understand why people with any kind of mobility problem wouldn't want to go there, but perhaps the able bodied find the stairs a challenge too?

Personally I think it depends where people are getting off. I use buses regularly. If I'm doing a longer journey or getting off at a busy stop, I'll go upstairs to sit down.

But if it's a short journey or I'm getting off at a stop that's hardly used, I'll stand as near the doors as possible. Fighting my way through a crowd to get off the bus is stressful and I always worry about the driver closing the door and pulling away before I've even got there.

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Personally I think it depends where people are

> getting off. I use buses regularly. If I'm doing a

> longer journey or getting off at a busy stop, I'll

> go upstairs to sit down.

> But if it's a short journey or I'm getting off at

> a stop that's hardly used, I'll stand as near the

> doors as possible. Fighting my way through a crowd

> to get off the bus is stressful and I always worry

> about the driver closing the door and pulling away

> before I've even got there.


It is stressful to have to to fight your way through a crowd to exit the bus, but if you take to standing by the doors, blocking the exit, then you are creating exactly this situation for others.


If you're only going a few stops then it may well be easier for you to stand, but it's also likely to inconvenience others trying to get on and off the bus. So perhaps it's best to find a seat instead of causing an unnecessary obstruction.

Some people may well be going just a couple of stops and as they have a Bus Pass and not willing to walk.


I generally go upstairs as I do not uses buses or short journeys..


Also some people may well have problems negotiating the stairs on a moving bus especially when getting off.


Other people are nervous about going upstairs as most bus crime takes place upstairs with people being attacked

or robbed of their phone / wallet.


DulwichFox

I share the confusion, RRR. I think they are only going a few stops and think that they have the right to clog up the passageqay. As for expecting passengers to move down - there's more likelihood of Louisa opening a charm school. Ask the driver to check on how many seats are free if you board a (seemingly) crowded bus and make an announcement to passengers or just ask the blockers to move on up/down. It's better than standing and seething.

The takeaway, as Americans say, is that some people are selfish and some bus routes need more vehicles.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I bet *Bob* hasn't been on a bus in years. A

> secret Range Rover driver if ever there was one.

>

> Louisa.



Not a fan of big flash dumb cars as it goes.


Mr Lush - I will be 'bussing it' this very afternoon. The anticipation and excitement is beginning to build already.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...