Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree with the idea in the OP of abolishing the ban and just enforcing existing laws on anti-social behaviour, but not with the idea of turning a blind eye. How long does it take for this form of discretion to become discrimination? Putting the power of judge and jury into the hands of someone whose main qualification is that they've been issued with a hi-vis jacket by the council seems quite risky. Also the main defence the council worker has when the inevitable argument starts is that they have no discretionary power, if you disagree with a parking ticket appeal to the coucil not the parking attendant. Lawyers can argue about what's reasonable and what isn't all day long in court without any harm done (except to the public purse), the same argument out on the street won't be quite so civilized. Yes to less law and no to more discretion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why is it a terrible place for teenagers?
    • Well, if you ever find yourself visiting, let us know 
    • Before I switched, if memory serves there was some sort of thing on Thames Water's website which you could use to determine whether or not you would be better off with a meter. No idea if it's still there. Also, I have a vague recollection that if you found you were worse off financially with the meter after a certain time period, you could switch back. Have I imagined that? Whatever, I don't actually recall hearing of anyone who thought they were worse off with a meter, though I'm sure there must be some.
    • Don't move to Southwark at all, save yourselves while you still can. Terrible place for teenagers, IMO.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...