Jump to content

Recommended Posts

wulfhound Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> would it not make far more sense to make

> Bikeability (the modern-day replacement for

> Cycling Proficiency) a compulsory part of the

> National Curriculum? It would also help make those

> who do later choose to get cars a lot more

> cycle-aware than some of those behind the wheel

> currently.

>



Excellent idea!

MissMadMoo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Motor vehicle and cycle involvement in pedestrian

> fatal and serious injuries, annual

> average 2009-13 in URBAN areas (excluding

> motorways:

>

> % of pedestrians killed

> By Car 99.2

> By Idiot cyclist 0.82

>

> Evil naughty cyclist, ban them all i say!


What percentage of traffic do 'cars' make up?


Did you know that between 2009-2013 zero pedestrians were killed on UK roads by Panzer tanks? They must be the safest form of transport, then.

On average each year from 2009-13:

- Cycles accounted for about 2% of all urban, non-motorway vehicular traffic and were

involved in 0.82% of pedestrian fatalities and 1.6% of serious injuries to pedestrians.

- Mile-for-mile in urban areas, motor vehicles were about 1.2 times more likely than a cycle to

seriously injure a pedestrian, and almost 2.5 times as likely to kill them.


Taken from CTC Jan 2015.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> MissMadMoo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Motor vehicle and cycle involvement in

> pedestrian

> > fatal and serious injuries, annual

> > average 2009-13 in URBAN areas (excluding

> > motorways:

> >

> > % of pedestrians killed

> > By Car 99.2

> > By Idiot cyclist 0.82

> >

> > Evil naughty cyclist, ban them all i say!

>

> What percentage of traffic do 'cars' make up?

>

> Did you know that between 2009-2013 zero

> pedestrians were killed on UK roads by Panzer

> tanks? They must be the safest form of transport,

> then.


Not that safe..

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31431596

http://news.sky.com/story/1494560/british-tank-flattens-learner-drivers-car

lol rahrah.


Sue, it took just 5 mins for my own two children to go from stabilsers to no stabilisers at the ages of 6 and 7 respectively. I remember it taking me a similar amound of time and at a similar age. Kids tend to get that you just have to go for it, better than adults do. A bicycle, once it's going, is hard to fall off of. Adults find it harder to learn to ride a cycle because they worry more about fallling off than kids do. It's the same for many things, like skiing and swimming for example. All easier to pick up in childhood. And there's plenty of evidence to back that up in a fair few psychology manuals. We can even test that here. How many people who cycle can remember when they went from stabilisers to two wheels? How hard was it?

This is an interesting EU report looking at the benefits of people cycling rather than using cars:


http://www.ecf.com/wp-content/uploads/ECF_Economic-benefits-of-cycling-in-EU-27.pdf


This report calculates an annual economic benefit of cycling in the EU-27 of at least ? 205 bn.


Also, when it comes to investment in cycle related infrastructure: (from the report above)


-----


A report for the UK Department of Health in 2010 concluded that


"...the economic justification for investments to facilitate cycling and walking has been undervalued or not even considered in public policy decision-making. Yet, almost all of the studies report economic benefits which are highly significant, with benefit to cost ratios averaging 13:1 (UK and nonUK)."


In comparison, UK government guidance on the evaluation of major projects says that a ?medium? value-for-money project will have a BCR of between 1.5 ? 2, and a ?high? value-for money project a BCR of at least 2.5.


-----


London also has a massive problem with pollution ( http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/15/nearly-9500-people-die-each-year-in-london-because-of-air-pollution-study ) and more people cycling could greatly contribute to a better urban environment in terms of NO2 levels for example.


These are also interesting reads about long term urban planning and analysis:


http://international.stockholm.se/globalassets/ovriga-bilder-och-filer/urban-mobility-strategy.pdf


http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=3972511&fileOId=3972519

Those 'lets make up a figure to call a cost benefit' studies are always dubious, to say the least (not picking on cycling ones here, any of them).


For instance, how can you possibly say that "Reduced noise pollution" is worth EUR300m of benefit to the economy?? How? It's all a nonsense.

@Loz - I totally agree and I heard a programme on the radio today where they argued something like along these lines - which made sense at least to me:


Benefit to cost ratios are indeed extremely hard to measure and evaluate and is not a precise science in any way - HOWEVER what conclusion can be safely be drawn from ratios of 10:1 and above is that it identifies an area which is highly likely to be interesting for further research and investigations. It's time to take cycling seriously from an economic perspective. It is still being seen as some sort of sport/hobby/kids/leisure activity but in reality it is an extremely smart and cost effective means of urban transportation. European urban areas are growing very rapidly and this problem won't go away.


Cycling is here to stay. I am pretty sure that what we are seeing now is only the beginning.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Sue, it took just 5 mins for my own two children

> to go from stabilsers to no stabilisers at the

> ages of 6 and 7 respectively. I remember it taking

> me a similar amound of time and at a similar age.

> Kids tend to get that you just have to go for it,

> better than adults do. A bicycle, once it's going,

> is hard to fall off of. Adults find it harder to

> learn to ride a cycle because they worry more

> about fallling off than kids do. It's the same for

> many things, like skiing and swimming for example.

> All easier to pick up in childhood. And there's

> plenty of evidence to back that up in a fair few

> psychology manuals. We can even test that here.

> How many people who cycle can remember when they

> went from stabilisers to two wheels? How hard was

> it?



Well, you may be right but you are extrapolating from a rather small sample of three - your two children and yourself :)


I can't comment because my grandchildren never had stabilisers, they had balance bikes before their "proper" bikes.


They both learned to ride their proper bikes very quickly (their parents are both keen cyclists) but I'm pretty sure it was rather more than five minutes :)) However if memory serves they were younger than your children, as the little one has just moved on to her second (larger) "proper" bike, and she's not six and a half yet.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> We can even test that here. How many people who cycle can remember when they

> went from stabilisers to two wheels? How hard was it?


Well, it was a very (very, very) long time ago, but IIRC it was over the course of a couple of weeks. Dad took the stabilisers up a notch every few days until I no longer used them at all, before removing them altogether. Mind you, I was only 4 or 5 (rather than your kid's 6/7) at the time, but I'd still be very surprised if a kid could go from first time on a bike to no stabilisers in 5 mins.


> It's the same for many things, like skiing and swimming for example. All easier to pick up in childhood.


I've taught many kids to ski, and it really depends on the kid in question. I've had some up and skiing blue level in a day or so and red by the end of the week. Others have had me beating my head on the magic carpet controls still on the nursery slope five days later. I imagine cycling is not dissimilar.

I think we are splitting hairs here. Of course some kids will take longer or not get there at all but I was talking generally (and generally most children pick things up very quickly), to make the point to Penguin that to think cyclists need as much training and examination as car or motorcyle drivers is nonsense.


Really young children haven't quite developed perfect balance Sue (and again that depends on the child) but 5-7 years seems to be the age when they start to negotiate those things very well. Boys of course lose some of that during puberty as their legs and arms spurt out of proportion. But that's a whole other discussion :D


I also do think that cyclists are in an awkward place. They are not a fast as most other traffic, and some drivers DO get irritated by that (even if the cyclist is cyling perfectly) and at the same time, they are too quick to really be sharing space with pedestrians. Cycle lanes are good but they are not possible on every road. In the end, the responsibility has to lie with road users themselves, putting safety first.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...