Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yesterday afternoon, Bellenden area, (30/7/15) doorbell rang and man with clipboard started (i think) to talk about 'engineering work in the area' - and when i responded with the usual 'we've done all work we want to do'produced a clip board and said he'd been called out to repair my boiler. He had our address but different name and phone number on slip board. We are so used to random callers, i am assuming it was scam to gain entry into house should off school teens or confused elderly answer door. On the other hand it could be genuine mistake, though i felt he was working very hard to amicably present far too much information ('oh isn't this a council house then?') and wasn't that interested in my suggestion of ringing the number on his clipboard (all hand-written)to find the real boiler customer.



White, male, middle aged, cheeky chappy. I am sure my yawning dopey seventeen year old would have given him full unsupervised range of the kitchen, so a heads up to let em know only to let in the expected!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/68648-suspicious-caller/
Share on other sites

Had a similar caller last year, white, middled aged, dressed like a builder. Garbled story about making a lot of noise while cutting down a tree in a neighbouring garden and could he come in and see if any branches were likely to fall into our garden. Knowing that there were no trees anywhere near I refused. He looked quite exasperated and pushed off. He didn't try any of our closest neighbours so am sure it was a complete scam.

Stringvest says his dad has Alzheimer's and was called upon. This reminded me of when a relative was unconscious in intensive care and I gave my mobile number to the ITU (it was written in a book at the desk) The only other party with my mobile number with reference to this hospitalisation, were the police. Immediately after this I received endless pre-recorded phone calls from personal injury lawyers and can only surmise that someone from the hospital or the police had passed my number on. It was so invasive at the time that I have become cynical and suspicious about the lack of privacy at these times.

I can't help thinking that our elderly relatives could fall prey to unscrupulous members of the 'caring' professions

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...