Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"No its not... As long as it does not say Raw, Natural Honey.. it can be labelled ay 'Honey' "


Still talking out of the wrong hole, sadly. What the rules say is:


"The purpose of this provision is to maintain the purity of honey, which is

perceived by the consumer to be an entirely natural product with nothing

added or taken away.....


...honey that contains

added ingredients may not be described as ?honey? (or by any of the reserved

descriptions)."

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone seen "Bee Movie"?

>

> Bee takes humans to court to stop them stealing

> the honey. One of my daughter's favourites, and I

> quite like it too.


I'm sure I have as the Mrs. likes animation. It was one of those if you start watching you have to continue.

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

What the rules say is:

>

> "The purpose of this provision is to maintain the

> purity of honey, which is

> perceived by the consumer to be an entirely

> natural product with nothing

> added or taken away.....

>

> ...honey that contains

> added ingredients may not be described as ?honey?

> (or by any of the reserved

> descriptions)."




Whooped 'em again, Josey

I was in Khan's today and, on my way to the chilli oil via the small packs of sesame seeds, passed the 'Honey' shelf.


Alongside the Rowse honey (?2 a jar, if anyone's interested) are much larger jars of what, on first glance, looked like regular, everyday honey, with the added attraction of a huge slab of honeycomb inside, also priced around ?2.


HOWEVER, ON CLOSER INSPECTION:


Ingredients as listed:


Honey (10%)

Fructose Corn Syrup (30%)

Honeycomb (60%)


The jars aren't labelled 'Honey' as such, but they do feature a sinister-looking bee on the label and are of a script that my untrained eye couldn't decipher.


I guess if you're a honey fan on the hunt for a cheap fix then it pays to read the ingredients.

Craig (butcher opposite Plough) has two types of honey at ?5 for a large jar.


The darker one, he tells me, is taken from the hives when they are mainly collecting pollen from tree blossom and other woodland delights, the lighter one is more of a meadow thang.


The lighter one is cloudy-ish because some pollen is added - both are delicious.

Horsebox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was in Khan's today and, on my way to the chilli

> oil via the small packs of sesame seeds, passed

> the 'Honey' shelf.

>

> Alongside the Rowse honey (?2 a jar, if anyone's

> interested) are much larger jars of what, on first

> glance, looked like regular, everyday honey, with

> the added attraction of a huge slab of honeycomb

> inside, also priced around ?2.

>

> HOWEVER, ON CLOSER INSPECTION:

>

> Ingredients as listed:

>

> Honey (10%)

> Fructose Corn Syrup (30%)

> Honeycomb (60%)

>

> The jars aren't labelled 'Honey' as such, but they

> do feature a sinister-looking bee on the label and

> are of a script that my untrained eye couldn't

> decipher.

>

> I guess if you're a honey fan on the hunt for a

> cheap fix then it pays to read the ingredients.


Thank for that.

So even talking out of my arse I was still right


Foxy

The original discusion was that Blah Blah wrote.

'I get honey from khan's on Rye Lane. ?2 for a big jar and it has a piece of the actual honeycomb in it, which is a nice touch.'


And I said suggested that after buying the same product myself it was not real Honey.


When I asked in the Turkish shop on Lordship Lane for Honey I was shown the same product as

Blah Blah bought.


The jar had a Big Bee on the label and a piece of Honeycomb inside the jar that was enough

to convince Blah Blah and myself we had bought genuine Honey.


So technically being advertised and sold as Honey. Well it does have 10% honey. But 30% corn Syrup which

is what I said it was. Thats why it's ?2.00

Foxy don't bother talking about the facts. Why let them get in the way of a good opportunity for a tired old ad naseum Foxy/Louisa bashing eh?


Badgers Mount in Kent has a great garden centre that sells 100% real honey produced locally, and I can assure everyone it's a lot more than 2 quid a pop.


Louisa.

Quite right Lou..


I was just replying to Blah Blah that I was caught out by the same con.


Horsebox came up with the facts. Case Closed.


Then the usual mob step in and hijack the thread with pedantry comments with meticulous synchronicity.


You could almost set your watch by it. :)


Foxy

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes let's not let the fact that ot wasn't labelled

> as honey get in the way of Fox being completely

> incapable of admitting he's wrong about anything.



Have you read ANY of this tread. ?


I said it was 'Fructose Corn Syrup ' and it was / is.



DulwichFox.. Not arguing .. Just Quoting Facts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you've got to raise taxes, then those inheriting multi-million pound estates, landlords, second property owners, the privately educated, and wealthier pensioners (considering how they have been disproportionately insulated for many years), doesn't' seem like the most unreasonable places to do so. We can't just keep loading more and more pain on young, working renters because it's less noisy. The fact that the media are absolutely up in arms, suggests there has actually been some political bravery, and that power, wealth and influence isn't acting as an absolute inoculant to tax rises for once.
    • Lammy was right on both accounts.  That is not incompetence.  Kim Darroch, the then US Ambassador was also correct with an assessment of the last Trump presidency.  I don't want to be the 51st state 
    • Hi all,    We are looking for a pregnant person for 1 hours modelling for a campaign shoot that is happening this Saturday (23rd November) in Peckham. We are looking for real people, so no previous modelling experience required.  The shoot is for a new body care brand, and so the model will be required to wear a bodysuit and apply product (all product is clinically proven to be pregnancy safe).  Payment would be made in a goody bag from the brand.  If this is you (or you know anyone who would be good for this), please reach out!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...