Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"No its not... As long as it does not say Raw, Natural Honey.. it can be labelled ay 'Honey' "


Still talking out of the wrong hole, sadly. What the rules say is:


"The purpose of this provision is to maintain the purity of honey, which is

perceived by the consumer to be an entirely natural product with nothing

added or taken away.....


...honey that contains

added ingredients may not be described as ?honey? (or by any of the reserved

descriptions)."

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone seen "Bee Movie"?

>

> Bee takes humans to court to stop them stealing

> the honey. One of my daughter's favourites, and I

> quite like it too.


I'm sure I have as the Mrs. likes animation. It was one of those if you start watching you have to continue.

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

What the rules say is:

>

> "The purpose of this provision is to maintain the

> purity of honey, which is

> perceived by the consumer to be an entirely

> natural product with nothing

> added or taken away.....

>

> ...honey that contains

> added ingredients may not be described as ?honey?

> (or by any of the reserved

> descriptions)."




Whooped 'em again, Josey

I was in Khan's today and, on my way to the chilli oil via the small packs of sesame seeds, passed the 'Honey' shelf.


Alongside the Rowse honey (?2 a jar, if anyone's interested) are much larger jars of what, on first glance, looked like regular, everyday honey, with the added attraction of a huge slab of honeycomb inside, also priced around ?2.


HOWEVER, ON CLOSER INSPECTION:


Ingredients as listed:


Honey (10%)

Fructose Corn Syrup (30%)

Honeycomb (60%)


The jars aren't labelled 'Honey' as such, but they do feature a sinister-looking bee on the label and are of a script that my untrained eye couldn't decipher.


I guess if you're a honey fan on the hunt for a cheap fix then it pays to read the ingredients.

Craig (butcher opposite Plough) has two types of honey at ?5 for a large jar.


The darker one, he tells me, is taken from the hives when they are mainly collecting pollen from tree blossom and other woodland delights, the lighter one is more of a meadow thang.


The lighter one is cloudy-ish because some pollen is added - both are delicious.

Horsebox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was in Khan's today and, on my way to the chilli

> oil via the small packs of sesame seeds, passed

> the 'Honey' shelf.

>

> Alongside the Rowse honey (?2 a jar, if anyone's

> interested) are much larger jars of what, on first

> glance, looked like regular, everyday honey, with

> the added attraction of a huge slab of honeycomb

> inside, also priced around ?2.

>

> HOWEVER, ON CLOSER INSPECTION:

>

> Ingredients as listed:

>

> Honey (10%)

> Fructose Corn Syrup (30%)

> Honeycomb (60%)

>

> The jars aren't labelled 'Honey' as such, but they

> do feature a sinister-looking bee on the label and

> are of a script that my untrained eye couldn't

> decipher.

>

> I guess if you're a honey fan on the hunt for a

> cheap fix then it pays to read the ingredients.


Thank for that.

So even talking out of my arse I was still right


Foxy

The original discusion was that Blah Blah wrote.

'I get honey from khan's on Rye Lane. ?2 for a big jar and it has a piece of the actual honeycomb in it, which is a nice touch.'


And I said suggested that after buying the same product myself it was not real Honey.


When I asked in the Turkish shop on Lordship Lane for Honey I was shown the same product as

Blah Blah bought.


The jar had a Big Bee on the label and a piece of Honeycomb inside the jar that was enough

to convince Blah Blah and myself we had bought genuine Honey.


So technically being advertised and sold as Honey. Well it does have 10% honey. But 30% corn Syrup which

is what I said it was. Thats why it's ?2.00

Foxy don't bother talking about the facts. Why let them get in the way of a good opportunity for a tired old ad naseum Foxy/Louisa bashing eh?


Badgers Mount in Kent has a great garden centre that sells 100% real honey produced locally, and I can assure everyone it's a lot more than 2 quid a pop.


Louisa.

Quite right Lou..


I was just replying to Blah Blah that I was caught out by the same con.


Horsebox came up with the facts. Case Closed.


Then the usual mob step in and hijack the thread with pedantry comments with meticulous synchronicity.


You could almost set your watch by it. :)


Foxy

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes let's not let the fact that ot wasn't labelled

> as honey get in the way of Fox being completely

> incapable of admitting he's wrong about anything.



Have you read ANY of this tread. ?


I said it was 'Fructose Corn Syrup ' and it was / is.



DulwichFox.. Not arguing .. Just Quoting Facts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you're a fundraising intermediary, reporting promptly and accurately on how you've raised and spent funds seems quite important.
    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...