Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Celia Hammond do an extremely good job and I believe most of the people who work there are volunteers. Whilst racism in any form is abhorrent this is probably one individual and perhaps it would be better to speak to one of the managers there rather than casting aspertions on the whole organisation.
I know they do a good job with the rescue cats which is why I stated that I got my 3 from them. My complaint would be to the head of the organisation because in this day and age no-one should be speaking like that in an open workplace. I hasten to add that it was only the one person saying those things.
Yeah they do a great job but some of their staff are soooooooo rude its unreal. I wont take my cats there anymore even though I rehomed them from there. Theres only a couple of people there that are willing to help or have any idea about how to talk to people. Its such a shame because they are a great local charity that do some brilliant work-just a shame they havent employed charity minded people
If you let it go then the manager will not learn anything. I think you should write a letter of complaint to the person above her. She wont get sacked but they will tell her to act more professionaly at work and be careful what she says in future. You cant change peoples views but you can change the way they behave at least.

I got my 2 cats from Celia Hammond about 4 years ago and the woman that showed me round could not have been nicer. Since then I have always encouraged people thinking about getting a cat to visit Celia Hammond first. But about 6 months ago a colleague took my advice and picked up a cat from there. When he went back for the cats injections he was astonished at how rude one of the staff was to him. He said if he had been going to select a cat he would have walked out.


I would not like to think the actions of one member of staff might stop people donating, adopting or volunteering.

You can get that kind of treatment from a trip to any vets.

Our annual trip to the one on Lordship Lane was not the usual - the first two in - we were told our monsters were quite considerably underweight (For their breed and size they quite clearly are not), were cross questioned as to their eating, cleaning and playing habits as if we kept them locked up in a cat basket all the time or weren't looking after them. Quite surprisingly we left wondering where the girl got her qualifications from. The 2nd two in were seen by someone completely different and was much more caring (especially to our old girl). The difference was very noticable and obviously when going back (if we do) we shall ensure we wont be seen by that particular vet again.


It's a shame we encounter such things but it happens in many places... :(

I completely agree. The animals should not suffer because of those people....BUT those people represent the trust and they should be doing a better job because they are spokespeople for the trust.


I urge anyone who wants a cat to go them to rehome, to dontae money or food or bedding for those poor cats that are still there stuck in cages for days on end.


But the customers/adopters are the ones keeping that place afloat and should be treated with the respect that is deserved. Not because we are customers but because we are in a civilised country and are trying to help.

i got my cats from celia hammonds and i must say that most of the staff there are really nice, unfortunatly there are a few bad apples that like playing god. The work they do there is second to none and its really nice that they help all the cats that need it most. I have had a few issues in the past with the rudeness of the indian receptionist, but obviously she has a god complex and has no life!i just pity her. You should write a letter and make sure you send it to Celia Hammond DIRECT p

Racism is not acceptable in this day and age. ThaT should have died out with the dinosaurs!

But the customers/adopters are the ones keeping that place afloat and should be treated with the respect that is deserved. Not because we are customers but because we are in a civilised country and are trying to help.


i agree with catloverkathy the customers should be treated with the dignity they deserve after all they wouldnt be there if no-one took cats from them. Maybe they should think about that abit more

  • Administrator
I am putting a stop to this. When someone i.e. catloverkathy has a conversation with themselves as a different user i.e. vivien to slag off a business/organisation, alarm bells ring in Forum Towers. Take your issues to them, do not use the forum to falsely enhance your story.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...