Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What a hilarious thread, great belly laughs!


I watched the video, and I feel really sorry for PROSser and chums.


They really want the world to be a better place, but they have to fight a sort of schizophrenic battle in wanting people to be good, but hating them for being bad...


They focus a simmering religious contempt at the whole of society, but unable to do anything as unpleasant as attacking someone in the street, they choose amorphous enemies - the 'state', the 'BBC' or 'the Forum elite'.


And propping all this up is the absolute conviction that if they haven't got everything they want, it's because somebody else stole it.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The US has spent much of the post war period

> throwing it's orb about lets face it, I don't

> thunk it a coincidence that they didn't sign up to

> the ICC, and I would he delighted to see Bush and

> Blair end up in a dock in the Hague. I think

> there's a pretty strong case frankly, but I don't

> see the political will so it won't ever happen

> sadly.

>

> If it did it would set a marvellous precedent that

> might doesn't make right a d might encourage a tad

> more circumspection in future leaders prone to

> military adventurism.

>

> Mind you, that Spamish judge, he doesn't mind

> ruffling feathers, like oni wan kenobi, he's my o

> ly hope ;)



We have this conception that justice is universal, but unfortunately we have yet to develop the right methodology to administer it.


That has consequences for international criminal justice, because there is no proportionality.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23717998-details/BBC+Centre+designed+on+an+envelope+is+given+Grade+II+heritage+status/article.do


A novel way to ensure that the BBC remain where they are. I wonder why they have just spent a living fortune kitting out the BBC Buildings on Oxford street then ? Maybe the executives need to be closer to the private members clubs of London's West End

Whynniard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You would have thought that " 8 British soldiers

> killed in 24hrs" would have been a huge story and

> a even larger headline ? BBC Website currently

> leads with ...................." Troops fighting

> for UK's future" !!!!!!!!

>

> does anyone else find that slightly odd ?


It seems well reported to me

I thought we were ? does this not constitute war, is it just an excurision or something then, maybe that's why they are driving around in light armour, it not really a war , may be they did not tick all the boxes back at the treasury.


Question 1. Will you or any one else in your regiment be travelling around in a Tank, if not go straight to section C.

I always stayed in the relative safety of the British Embassy, more accurate would be the military mission, in Kabul when I was there last, but that was 2002.


I thought we were there to catch OBL, then we got into rooting democracy, what is the new imperative?


Tanks are fairly worthless in AFG, btw.

This forum seems to be inhabited by some odd types, people's republic ? or are people miss posting ? Anyway ...that's interesting S, i was joking about the tanks, it was really a reference to the light skinned vehicles that are being driven around in Afganistan, however a lot of the deaths seem to be occuring while out on foot patrol....


"were you really told your mission was to capture Bin Laden ? "


actually maybe a new thread -

Whynniard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This forum seems to be inhabited by some odd

> types, people's republic ? or are people miss

> posting ? Anyway ...that's interesting S, i was

> joking about the tanks, it was really a reference

> to the light skinned vehicles that are being

> driven around in Afganistan, however a lot of the

> deaths seem to be occuring while out on foot

> patrol....

>

> "were you really told your mission was to capture

> Bin Laden ? "

>

> actually maybe a new thread -



For my part, from memory, there were less than 300 of us in Kabul in a mentoring role with the ANA, during the time I was there and we had suffered less than half a dozen casualties to the time I left.


Anaconda was going on in Tora Bora, but we had not yet established the PRT and battlegroup to protect it at that point in Helmand.


As to capturing OBL, there is a 1600 page report from the Royal Marines which is devasting in its criticism of the US mission to take him.


It was a complete cluster and allowed him to simply walk over the border into Pakistan.


Regarding IEDs these are not a new phenomena to the army, we dealt with them for many years in Northern Ireland, mostly culvert bombs which wreaked some devasting results over time, these were mostly command detonated.


Iraq provided a different challenge, of course and it is the success of the IED there, which has driven the change in tactic in AFG towards the more effective use of these.


The Taliban know that in a force on force engagement they are going to come of a very very poor second every time.


The main problem is devoting huge financial and manpower resource against a device conjured up on a $50 budget, built around an artillery shell, or home made explosives.


In fact, the Joint Anti-IED Task Force is fronted by a US two star and has an annual budget of some $3 billion.


Personally, I have very serious concerns about the current mission, but you might be right a different thread may be in order.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
    • Avoid any 2nd hand vehicle with the Ford petrol 1.0 Ecoboost engine and the Petrol 1.2 PureTech engine that can be found in Peugeot, Citroen, Vauxhall.... (you need to mention price for advice)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...